Psychological interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis

Introduction Psychological factors such as fear avoidance beliefs, depression, anxiety, catastrophic thinking and familial and social stress, have been associated with high disability levels in people with chronic low back pain (LBP). Guidelines endorse the integration of psychological interventions...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lingxiao Chen, Jill Hayden, Manuela Ferreira, Emma Ho, Milena Simic, Claire Ashton-James, Josielli Comachio, Paulo Ferreira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-09-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e034996.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841554675654983680
author Lingxiao Chen
Jill Hayden
Manuela Ferreira
Emma Ho
Milena Simic
Claire Ashton-James
Josielli Comachio
Paulo Ferreira
author_facet Lingxiao Chen
Jill Hayden
Manuela Ferreira
Emma Ho
Milena Simic
Claire Ashton-James
Josielli Comachio
Paulo Ferreira
author_sort Lingxiao Chen
collection DOAJ
description Introduction Psychological factors such as fear avoidance beliefs, depression, anxiety, catastrophic thinking and familial and social stress, have been associated with high disability levels in people with chronic low back pain (LBP). Guidelines endorse the integration of psychological interventions in the management of chronic LBP. However, uncertainty surrounds the comparative effectiveness of different psychological approaches. Network meta-analysis (NMA) allows comparison and ranking of numerous competing interventions for a given outcome of interest. Therefore, we will perform a systematic review with a NMA to determine which type of psychological intervention is most effective for adults with chronic non-specific LBP.Methods and analysis We will search electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, SCOPUS and CINAHL) from inception until 22 August 2019 for randomised controlled trials comparing psychological interventions to any comparison interventions in adults with chronic non-specific LBP. There will be no restriction on language. The primary outcomes will include physical function and pain intensity, and secondary outcomes will include health-related quality of life, fear avoidance, intervention compliance and safety. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2) tool and confidence in the evidence will be assessed using the Confidence in NMA (CINeMA) framework. We will conduct a random-effects NMA using a frequentist approach to estimate relative effects for all comparisons between treatments and rank treatments according to the mean rank and surface under the cumulative ranking curve values. All analyses will be performed in Stata.Ethics and dissemination No ethical approval is required. The research will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.PROSPERO registration number CRD42019138074.
format Article
id doaj-art-f8955193891e41d08eb47f78407728b6
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-f8955193891e41d08eb47f78407728b62025-01-08T13:10:08ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552020-09-0110910.1136/bmjopen-2019-034996Psychological interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysisLingxiao Chen0Jill Hayden1Manuela Ferreira2Emma Ho3Milena Simic4Claire Ashton-James5Josielli Comachio6Paulo Ferreira75 Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, ChinaCommunity Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, CanadaPain Management Research Institute, Kolling Institute, Northern Sydney Local Health District and Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, St Leonards, New South Wales, AustraliaFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, AustraliaSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia5 Pain Management, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, AustraliaFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, AustraliaSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, AustraliaIntroduction Psychological factors such as fear avoidance beliefs, depression, anxiety, catastrophic thinking and familial and social stress, have been associated with high disability levels in people with chronic low back pain (LBP). Guidelines endorse the integration of psychological interventions in the management of chronic LBP. However, uncertainty surrounds the comparative effectiveness of different psychological approaches. Network meta-analysis (NMA) allows comparison and ranking of numerous competing interventions for a given outcome of interest. Therefore, we will perform a systematic review with a NMA to determine which type of psychological intervention is most effective for adults with chronic non-specific LBP.Methods and analysis We will search electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, SCOPUS and CINAHL) from inception until 22 August 2019 for randomised controlled trials comparing psychological interventions to any comparison interventions in adults with chronic non-specific LBP. There will be no restriction on language. The primary outcomes will include physical function and pain intensity, and secondary outcomes will include health-related quality of life, fear avoidance, intervention compliance and safety. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2) tool and confidence in the evidence will be assessed using the Confidence in NMA (CINeMA) framework. We will conduct a random-effects NMA using a frequentist approach to estimate relative effects for all comparisons between treatments and rank treatments according to the mean rank and surface under the cumulative ranking curve values. All analyses will be performed in Stata.Ethics and dissemination No ethical approval is required. The research will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.PROSPERO registration number CRD42019138074.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e034996.full
spellingShingle Lingxiao Chen
Jill Hayden
Manuela Ferreira
Emma Ho
Milena Simic
Claire Ashton-James
Josielli Comachio
Paulo Ferreira
Psychological interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis
BMJ Open
title Psychological interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis
title_full Psychological interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Psychological interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Psychological interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis
title_short Psychological interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis
title_sort psychological interventions for chronic non specific low back pain protocol of a systematic review with network meta analysis
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e034996.full
work_keys_str_mv AT lingxiaochen psychologicalinterventionsforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis
AT jillhayden psychologicalinterventionsforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis
AT manuelaferreira psychologicalinterventionsforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis
AT emmaho psychologicalinterventionsforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis
AT milenasimic psychologicalinterventionsforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis
AT claireashtonjames psychologicalinterventionsforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis
AT josiellicomachio psychologicalinterventionsforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis
AT pauloferreira psychologicalinterventionsforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis