Bone Formation by Sheep Stem Cells in an Ectopic Mouse Model: Comparison of Adipose and Bone Marrow Derived Cells and Identification of Donor-Derived Bone by Antibody Staining

Background. Scaffolds for bone tissue engineering (BTE) can be loaded with stem and progenitor cells (SPC) from different sources to improve osteogenesis. SPC can be found in bone marrow, adipose tissue, and other tissues. Little is known about osteogenic potential of adipose-derived culture expande...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kristian Kjærgaard, Chris H. Dreyer, Nicholas Ditzel, Christina M. Andreasen, Li Chen, Søren P. Sheikh, Søren Overgaard, Ming Ding
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-01-01
Series:Stem Cells International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3846971
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832548096539623424
author Kristian Kjærgaard
Chris H. Dreyer
Nicholas Ditzel
Christina M. Andreasen
Li Chen
Søren P. Sheikh
Søren Overgaard
Ming Ding
author_facet Kristian Kjærgaard
Chris H. Dreyer
Nicholas Ditzel
Christina M. Andreasen
Li Chen
Søren P. Sheikh
Søren Overgaard
Ming Ding
author_sort Kristian Kjærgaard
collection DOAJ
description Background. Scaffolds for bone tissue engineering (BTE) can be loaded with stem and progenitor cells (SPC) from different sources to improve osteogenesis. SPC can be found in bone marrow, adipose tissue, and other tissues. Little is known about osteogenic potential of adipose-derived culture expanded, adherent cells (A-CEAC). This study compares in vivo osteogenic capacity between A-CEAC and bone marrow derived culture expanded, adherent cells (BM-CEAC). Method. A-CEAC and BM-CEAC were isolated from five female sheep and seeded on hydroxyapatite granules prior to subcutaneous implantation in immunodeficient mice. The doses of cells in the implants were 0.5 × 106, 1.0 × 106, or 1.5 × 106 A-CEAC and 0.5 × 106 BM-CEAC, respectively. After eight weeks, bone volume versus total tissue volume (BV/TV) was quantified using histomorphometry. Origin of new bone was assessed using human vimentin (HVIM) antibody staining. Results. BM-CEAC yielded significantly higher BV/TV than any A-CEAC group, and differences between A-CEAC groups were not statistically significant. HVIM antibody stain was successfully used to identify sheep cells in this model. Conclusion. A-CEAC and BM-CEAC were capable of forming bone, and BM-CEAC yielded significantly higher BV/TV than any A-CEAC group. In vitro treatment to enhance osteogenic capacity of A-CEAC is suggested for further research in ovine bone tissue engineering.
format Article
id doaj-art-f8704dadfc494a51afeb4683e5c89d99
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-966X
1687-9678
language English
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Stem Cells International
spelling doaj-art-f8704dadfc494a51afeb4683e5c89d992025-02-03T06:42:25ZengWileyStem Cells International1687-966X1687-96782016-01-01201610.1155/2016/38469713846971Bone Formation by Sheep Stem Cells in an Ectopic Mouse Model: Comparison of Adipose and Bone Marrow Derived Cells and Identification of Donor-Derived Bone by Antibody StainingKristian Kjærgaard0Chris H. Dreyer1Nicholas Ditzel2Christina M. Andreasen3Li Chen4Søren P. Sheikh5Søren Overgaard6Ming Ding7Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Sdr. Boulevard 29, 5000 Odense C, DenmarkOrthopaedic Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Sdr. Boulevard 29, 5000 Odense C, DenmarkDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Molecular Endocrinology Laboratory (KMEB), Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsløws Vej 25.1, 5000 Odense C, DenmarkOrthopaedic Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Sdr. Boulevard 29, 5000 Odense C, DenmarkDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Molecular Endocrinology Laboratory (KMEB), Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsløws Vej 25.1, 5000 Odense C, DenmarkLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 21.3, 5000 Odense C, DenmarkOrthopaedic Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Sdr. Boulevard 29, 5000 Odense C, DenmarkOrthopaedic Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Sdr. Boulevard 29, 5000 Odense C, DenmarkBackground. Scaffolds for bone tissue engineering (BTE) can be loaded with stem and progenitor cells (SPC) from different sources to improve osteogenesis. SPC can be found in bone marrow, adipose tissue, and other tissues. Little is known about osteogenic potential of adipose-derived culture expanded, adherent cells (A-CEAC). This study compares in vivo osteogenic capacity between A-CEAC and bone marrow derived culture expanded, adherent cells (BM-CEAC). Method. A-CEAC and BM-CEAC were isolated from five female sheep and seeded on hydroxyapatite granules prior to subcutaneous implantation in immunodeficient mice. The doses of cells in the implants were 0.5 × 106, 1.0 × 106, or 1.5 × 106 A-CEAC and 0.5 × 106 BM-CEAC, respectively. After eight weeks, bone volume versus total tissue volume (BV/TV) was quantified using histomorphometry. Origin of new bone was assessed using human vimentin (HVIM) antibody staining. Results. BM-CEAC yielded significantly higher BV/TV than any A-CEAC group, and differences between A-CEAC groups were not statistically significant. HVIM antibody stain was successfully used to identify sheep cells in this model. Conclusion. A-CEAC and BM-CEAC were capable of forming bone, and BM-CEAC yielded significantly higher BV/TV than any A-CEAC group. In vitro treatment to enhance osteogenic capacity of A-CEAC is suggested for further research in ovine bone tissue engineering.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3846971
spellingShingle Kristian Kjærgaard
Chris H. Dreyer
Nicholas Ditzel
Christina M. Andreasen
Li Chen
Søren P. Sheikh
Søren Overgaard
Ming Ding
Bone Formation by Sheep Stem Cells in an Ectopic Mouse Model: Comparison of Adipose and Bone Marrow Derived Cells and Identification of Donor-Derived Bone by Antibody Staining
Stem Cells International
title Bone Formation by Sheep Stem Cells in an Ectopic Mouse Model: Comparison of Adipose and Bone Marrow Derived Cells and Identification of Donor-Derived Bone by Antibody Staining
title_full Bone Formation by Sheep Stem Cells in an Ectopic Mouse Model: Comparison of Adipose and Bone Marrow Derived Cells and Identification of Donor-Derived Bone by Antibody Staining
title_fullStr Bone Formation by Sheep Stem Cells in an Ectopic Mouse Model: Comparison of Adipose and Bone Marrow Derived Cells and Identification of Donor-Derived Bone by Antibody Staining
title_full_unstemmed Bone Formation by Sheep Stem Cells in an Ectopic Mouse Model: Comparison of Adipose and Bone Marrow Derived Cells and Identification of Donor-Derived Bone by Antibody Staining
title_short Bone Formation by Sheep Stem Cells in an Ectopic Mouse Model: Comparison of Adipose and Bone Marrow Derived Cells and Identification of Donor-Derived Bone by Antibody Staining
title_sort bone formation by sheep stem cells in an ectopic mouse model comparison of adipose and bone marrow derived cells and identification of donor derived bone by antibody staining
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3846971
work_keys_str_mv AT kristiankjærgaard boneformationbysheepstemcellsinanectopicmousemodelcomparisonofadiposeandbonemarrowderivedcellsandidentificationofdonorderivedbonebyantibodystaining
AT chrishdreyer boneformationbysheepstemcellsinanectopicmousemodelcomparisonofadiposeandbonemarrowderivedcellsandidentificationofdonorderivedbonebyantibodystaining
AT nicholasditzel boneformationbysheepstemcellsinanectopicmousemodelcomparisonofadiposeandbonemarrowderivedcellsandidentificationofdonorderivedbonebyantibodystaining
AT christinamandreasen boneformationbysheepstemcellsinanectopicmousemodelcomparisonofadiposeandbonemarrowderivedcellsandidentificationofdonorderivedbonebyantibodystaining
AT lichen boneformationbysheepstemcellsinanectopicmousemodelcomparisonofadiposeandbonemarrowderivedcellsandidentificationofdonorderivedbonebyantibodystaining
AT sørenpsheikh boneformationbysheepstemcellsinanectopicmousemodelcomparisonofadiposeandbonemarrowderivedcellsandidentificationofdonorderivedbonebyantibodystaining
AT sørenovergaard boneformationbysheepstemcellsinanectopicmousemodelcomparisonofadiposeandbonemarrowderivedcellsandidentificationofdonorderivedbonebyantibodystaining
AT mingding boneformationbysheepstemcellsinanectopicmousemodelcomparisonofadiposeandbonemarrowderivedcellsandidentificationofdonorderivedbonebyantibodystaining