Analyzing Court Decisions on Interfaith Marriage: A Maqasid Sharia Perspective
The aim of this research is to analyze court decisions on interfaith marriages, specifically the decisions numbered 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN. Sby and 71/Pdt.P/2017/PN. Bla. This research uses a qualitative method with a normative juridical approach. The data in this study are digital data. The results of t...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Arabic |
| Published: |
Jurusan Syariah Fakultas Agama Islam Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang
2024-05-01
|
| Series: | Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/ua/article/view/35268 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832557443753705472 |
|---|---|
| author | Allysa Novita Putri Iffatin Nur |
| author_facet | Allysa Novita Putri Iffatin Nur |
| author_sort | Allysa Novita Putri |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The aim of this research is to analyze court decisions on interfaith marriages, specifically the decisions numbered 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN. Sby and 71/Pdt.P/2017/PN. Bla. This research uses a qualitative method with a normative juridical approach. The data in this study are digital data. The results of this research show differences in the interpretation of Article 2 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law. The Surabaya District Court's decision interprets Article 2 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law as indicating that interfaith marriage is not prohibited. This leads to a legal vacuum that causes judges to use the explanation of Article 35 (a) of the Population Administration Law to permit interfaith marriages and Article 10 paragraph (3) of Government Regulation No. 9 of 1975 to provide a basis for the implementation of interfaith marriages. The Blora District Court's decision interprets Article 2 paragraph (1) to consider the validity of marriage based on the respective religions of the applicants. The analysis results based on the theory of maqasid al-shari'ah proposed by Jamaluddin Athiyah indicate that the decision from the Surabaya District Court does not show preservation, while the decision from the Blora District Court does show preservation. The analysis based on Islamic legal methodology, maqasid al-shari'ah proposed by Jasser Auda, shows that both decisions do not fully meet the standards of the system approach. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-f7f9b1d7c135466c9fec8fe5d378243c |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2597-6168 2597-6176 |
| language | Arabic |
| publishDate | 2024-05-01 |
| publisher | Jurusan Syariah Fakultas Agama Islam Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam |
| spelling | doaj-art-f7f9b1d7c135466c9fec8fe5d378243c2025-02-03T04:53:47ZaraJurusan Syariah Fakultas Agama Islam Universitas Islam Sultan Agung SemarangUlul Albab: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam2597-61682597-61762024-05-0161273810.30659/jua.v6i1.352689581Analyzing Court Decisions on Interfaith Marriage: A Maqasid Sharia PerspectiveAllysa Novita Putri0Iffatin Nur1Universitas Islam Negeri Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah TulungagungUniversitas Islam Negeri Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah TulungagungThe aim of this research is to analyze court decisions on interfaith marriages, specifically the decisions numbered 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN. Sby and 71/Pdt.P/2017/PN. Bla. This research uses a qualitative method with a normative juridical approach. The data in this study are digital data. The results of this research show differences in the interpretation of Article 2 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law. The Surabaya District Court's decision interprets Article 2 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law as indicating that interfaith marriage is not prohibited. This leads to a legal vacuum that causes judges to use the explanation of Article 35 (a) of the Population Administration Law to permit interfaith marriages and Article 10 paragraph (3) of Government Regulation No. 9 of 1975 to provide a basis for the implementation of interfaith marriages. The Blora District Court's decision interprets Article 2 paragraph (1) to consider the validity of marriage based on the respective religions of the applicants. The analysis results based on the theory of maqasid al-shari'ah proposed by Jamaluddin Athiyah indicate that the decision from the Surabaya District Court does not show preservation, while the decision from the Blora District Court does show preservation. The analysis based on Islamic legal methodology, maqasid al-shari'ah proposed by Jasser Auda, shows that both decisions do not fully meet the standards of the system approach.https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/ua/article/view/35268interfaith marriage, court order, maqasid shari'ah |
| spellingShingle | Allysa Novita Putri Iffatin Nur Analyzing Court Decisions on Interfaith Marriage: A Maqasid Sharia Perspective Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam interfaith marriage, court order, maqasid shari'ah |
| title | Analyzing Court Decisions on Interfaith Marriage: A Maqasid Sharia Perspective |
| title_full | Analyzing Court Decisions on Interfaith Marriage: A Maqasid Sharia Perspective |
| title_fullStr | Analyzing Court Decisions on Interfaith Marriage: A Maqasid Sharia Perspective |
| title_full_unstemmed | Analyzing Court Decisions on Interfaith Marriage: A Maqasid Sharia Perspective |
| title_short | Analyzing Court Decisions on Interfaith Marriage: A Maqasid Sharia Perspective |
| title_sort | analyzing court decisions on interfaith marriage a maqasid sharia perspective |
| topic | interfaith marriage, court order, maqasid shari'ah |
| url | https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/ua/article/view/35268 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT allysanovitaputri analyzingcourtdecisionsoninterfaithmarriageamaqasidshariaperspective AT iffatinnur analyzingcourtdecisionsoninterfaithmarriageamaqasidshariaperspective |