An innovative method to determine the stress-dependency of Poisson’s ratio of granitic rocks
Abstract Uniaxial Compressive test (UCS) results are essential in evaluation the values of Poisson’s ratio. However, according to the suggestion of the International Society for Rock Mechanics, Poisson’s ratio can be determined using three alternative methods: the secant, average and tangent. Applyi...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Scientific Reports |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-75892-2 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Abstract Uniaxial Compressive test (UCS) results are essential in evaluation the values of Poisson’s ratio. However, according to the suggestion of the International Society for Rock Mechanics, Poisson’s ratio can be determined using three alternative methods: the secant, average and tangent. Applying these methods causes discrepancies in the results; according to our experiences, the differences can be threefold or more. This paper aims to study the process of changes of Poisson’s ratio for intact rock during loading from micro-crack initiation to failure stage. The objective of this theoretical investigation is to establish a straightforward mathematical formulation between σ/σc and intact rock’s Poisson’s ratio value. To outline these changes forty two granite rocks were investigated from Bátaapáti radioactive waste repository (Hungary) and the calculation was performed by using the new formula from the beginning of loading till failure stage at UCS test. In the laboratory test program, Poisson’s ratio derived from standard tests varies with momentary stress; it steadily increases as stress rises until reaching the stress level causing unstable crack propagation. Additionally, the Poisson’s rate follows a linear increase with stress, up to the point of unstable crack propagation stress. The research demonstrated that the proposed equations provide competent values for the root mean squared error value (ranging from 0 to 0.04), the mean absolute percentage error (ranging from 0.6% to 18%) and the mean absolute error (ranging from 0 to 0.04). Contrary to previous ideas, our results suggest that the Poisson’s ratio is not a constant for rigid rocks. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2045-2322 |