A Numerical Investigation of the Flame Characteristics of a CH<sub>4</sub>/NH<sub>3</sub> Blend Under Different Swirl Intensity and Diffusion Models

This study investigates the effects of diffusion modeling and swirl intensity on flow fields and NO emissions in CH<sub>4</sub>/NH<sub>3</sub> non-premixed swirling flames using large eddy simulations (LESs). Simulations are performed for a 50/50 ammonia–methane blend at thre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmed Adam, Ayman Elbaz, Reo Kai, Hiroaki Watanabe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-07-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/15/3921
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849407482006339584
author Ahmed Adam
Ayman Elbaz
Reo Kai
Hiroaki Watanabe
author_facet Ahmed Adam
Ayman Elbaz
Reo Kai
Hiroaki Watanabe
author_sort Ahmed Adam
collection DOAJ
description This study investigates the effects of diffusion modeling and swirl intensity on flow fields and NO emissions in CH<sub>4</sub>/NH<sub>3</sub> non-premixed swirling flames using large eddy simulations (LESs). Simulations are performed for a 50/50 ammonia–methane blend at three global equivalence ratios of 0.77, 0.54, and 0.46 and two swirl numbers of 8 and 12, comparing the unity Lewis number (ULN) and mixture-averaged diffusion (MAD) models against the experimental data includes OH-PLIF and ON-PLIF reported in a prior study by the KAUST group. Both models produce similar flow fields, but the MAD model alters the flame structure and species distributions due to differential diffusion (DD) and limitations in its Flamelet library. Notably, the MAD library lacks unstable flame branch solutions, leading to extensive interpolation between extinction and stable branches. This results in overpredicted progress variable source terms and reactive scalars, both within and beyond the flame zone. The ULN model better reproduces experimental OH profiles and localizes NO formation near the flame front, whereas the MAD model predicts broader NO distributions due to nitrogen species diffusion. Higher swirl intensities shorten the flame and shift NO production upstream. While a low equivalence ratio provides enough air for good mixing, lower ammonia and higher NO contents in exhaust gases, respectively.
format Article
id doaj-art-f6f65f83e3e648c7814fdfe38a0c3d2f
institution Kabale University
issn 1996-1073
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj-art-f6f65f83e3e648c7814fdfe38a0c3d2f2025-08-20T03:36:03ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732025-07-011815392110.3390/en18153921A Numerical Investigation of the Flame Characteristics of a CH<sub>4</sub>/NH<sub>3</sub> Blend Under Different Swirl Intensity and Diffusion ModelsAhmed Adam0Ayman Elbaz1Reo Kai2Hiroaki Watanabe3Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Engineering Sciences (IGSES), Kyushu University, Kasuga City 816-8580, Fukuoka Prefecture, JapanClean Energy Research Platform (CERP), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi ArabiaInterdisciplinary Graduate School of Engineering Sciences (IGSES), Kyushu University, Kasuga City 816-8580, Fukuoka Prefecture, JapanInterdisciplinary Graduate School of Engineering Sciences (IGSES), Kyushu University, Kasuga City 816-8580, Fukuoka Prefecture, JapanThis study investigates the effects of diffusion modeling and swirl intensity on flow fields and NO emissions in CH<sub>4</sub>/NH<sub>3</sub> non-premixed swirling flames using large eddy simulations (LESs). Simulations are performed for a 50/50 ammonia–methane blend at three global equivalence ratios of 0.77, 0.54, and 0.46 and two swirl numbers of 8 and 12, comparing the unity Lewis number (ULN) and mixture-averaged diffusion (MAD) models against the experimental data includes OH-PLIF and ON-PLIF reported in a prior study by the KAUST group. Both models produce similar flow fields, but the MAD model alters the flame structure and species distributions due to differential diffusion (DD) and limitations in its Flamelet library. Notably, the MAD library lacks unstable flame branch solutions, leading to extensive interpolation between extinction and stable branches. This results in overpredicted progress variable source terms and reactive scalars, both within and beyond the flame zone. The ULN model better reproduces experimental OH profiles and localizes NO formation near the flame front, whereas the MAD model predicts broader NO distributions due to nitrogen species diffusion. Higher swirl intensities shorten the flame and shift NO production upstream. While a low equivalence ratio provides enough air for good mixing, lower ammonia and higher NO contents in exhaust gases, respectively.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/15/3921turbulent non-premixed combustiondifferential diffusionflame structureFlamelet progress variable
spellingShingle Ahmed Adam
Ayman Elbaz
Reo Kai
Hiroaki Watanabe
A Numerical Investigation of the Flame Characteristics of a CH<sub>4</sub>/NH<sub>3</sub> Blend Under Different Swirl Intensity and Diffusion Models
Energies
turbulent non-premixed combustion
differential diffusion
flame structure
Flamelet progress variable
title A Numerical Investigation of the Flame Characteristics of a CH<sub>4</sub>/NH<sub>3</sub> Blend Under Different Swirl Intensity and Diffusion Models
title_full A Numerical Investigation of the Flame Characteristics of a CH<sub>4</sub>/NH<sub>3</sub> Blend Under Different Swirl Intensity and Diffusion Models
title_fullStr A Numerical Investigation of the Flame Characteristics of a CH<sub>4</sub>/NH<sub>3</sub> Blend Under Different Swirl Intensity and Diffusion Models
title_full_unstemmed A Numerical Investigation of the Flame Characteristics of a CH<sub>4</sub>/NH<sub>3</sub> Blend Under Different Swirl Intensity and Diffusion Models
title_short A Numerical Investigation of the Flame Characteristics of a CH<sub>4</sub>/NH<sub>3</sub> Blend Under Different Swirl Intensity and Diffusion Models
title_sort numerical investigation of the flame characteristics of a ch sub 4 sub nh sub 3 sub blend under different swirl intensity and diffusion models
topic turbulent non-premixed combustion
differential diffusion
flame structure
Flamelet progress variable
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/15/3921
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedadam anumericalinvestigationoftheflamecharacteristicsofachsub4subnhsub3subblendunderdifferentswirlintensityanddiffusionmodels
AT aymanelbaz anumericalinvestigationoftheflamecharacteristicsofachsub4subnhsub3subblendunderdifferentswirlintensityanddiffusionmodels
AT reokai anumericalinvestigationoftheflamecharacteristicsofachsub4subnhsub3subblendunderdifferentswirlintensityanddiffusionmodels
AT hiroakiwatanabe anumericalinvestigationoftheflamecharacteristicsofachsub4subnhsub3subblendunderdifferentswirlintensityanddiffusionmodels
AT ahmedadam numericalinvestigationoftheflamecharacteristicsofachsub4subnhsub3subblendunderdifferentswirlintensityanddiffusionmodels
AT aymanelbaz numericalinvestigationoftheflamecharacteristicsofachsub4subnhsub3subblendunderdifferentswirlintensityanddiffusionmodels
AT reokai numericalinvestigationoftheflamecharacteristicsofachsub4subnhsub3subblendunderdifferentswirlintensityanddiffusionmodels
AT hiroakiwatanabe numericalinvestigationoftheflamecharacteristicsofachsub4subnhsub3subblendunderdifferentswirlintensityanddiffusionmodels