History of Illicit Stimulant Use Is Not Associated with Long-Lasting Changes in Learning of Fine Motor Skills in Humans

Little is known about the long-lasting effect of use of illicit stimulant drugs on learning of new motor skills. We hypothesised that abstinent individuals with a history of primarily methamphetamine and ecstasy use would exhibit normal learning of a visuomotor tracking task compared to controls. Th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gabrielle Todd, Verity Pearson-Dennett, Stanley C. Flavel, Miranda Haberfield, Hannah Edwards, Jason M. White
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-01-01
Series:Neural Plasticity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9485079
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832555824666378240
author Gabrielle Todd
Verity Pearson-Dennett
Stanley C. Flavel
Miranda Haberfield
Hannah Edwards
Jason M. White
author_facet Gabrielle Todd
Verity Pearson-Dennett
Stanley C. Flavel
Miranda Haberfield
Hannah Edwards
Jason M. White
author_sort Gabrielle Todd
collection DOAJ
description Little is known about the long-lasting effect of use of illicit stimulant drugs on learning of new motor skills. We hypothesised that abstinent individuals with a history of primarily methamphetamine and ecstasy use would exhibit normal learning of a visuomotor tracking task compared to controls. The study involved three groups: abstinent stimulant users (n=21; 27 ± 6 yrs) and two gender-matched control groups comprising nondrug users (n=16; 22 ± 4 yrs) and cannabis users (n=16; 23 ± 5 yrs). Motor learning was assessed with a three-minute visuomotor tracking task. Subjects were instructed to follow a moving target on a computer screen with movement of the index finger. Metacarpophalangeal joint angle and first dorsal interosseous electromyographic activity were recorded. Pattern matching was assessed by cross-correlation of the joint angle and target traces. Distance from the target (tracking error) was also calculated. Motor learning was evident in the visuomotor task. Pattern matching improved over time (cross-correlation coefficient) and tracking error decreased. However, task performance did not differ between the groups. The results suggest that learning of a new fine visuomotor skill is unchanged in individuals with a history of illicit stimulant use.
format Article
id doaj-art-f6b8e2f7b45144e4af59898047b445d2
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-5904
1687-5443
language English
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Neural Plasticity
spelling doaj-art-f6b8e2f7b45144e4af59898047b445d22025-02-03T05:47:11ZengWileyNeural Plasticity2090-59041687-54432016-01-01201610.1155/2016/94850799485079History of Illicit Stimulant Use Is Not Associated with Long-Lasting Changes in Learning of Fine Motor Skills in HumansGabrielle Todd0Verity Pearson-Dennett1Stanley C. Flavel2Miranda Haberfield3Hannah Edwards4Jason M. White5School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, AustraliaSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, AustraliaSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, AustraliaSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, AustraliaSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, AustraliaSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, AustraliaLittle is known about the long-lasting effect of use of illicit stimulant drugs on learning of new motor skills. We hypothesised that abstinent individuals with a history of primarily methamphetamine and ecstasy use would exhibit normal learning of a visuomotor tracking task compared to controls. The study involved three groups: abstinent stimulant users (n=21; 27 ± 6 yrs) and two gender-matched control groups comprising nondrug users (n=16; 22 ± 4 yrs) and cannabis users (n=16; 23 ± 5 yrs). Motor learning was assessed with a three-minute visuomotor tracking task. Subjects were instructed to follow a moving target on a computer screen with movement of the index finger. Metacarpophalangeal joint angle and first dorsal interosseous electromyographic activity were recorded. Pattern matching was assessed by cross-correlation of the joint angle and target traces. Distance from the target (tracking error) was also calculated. Motor learning was evident in the visuomotor task. Pattern matching improved over time (cross-correlation coefficient) and tracking error decreased. However, task performance did not differ between the groups. The results suggest that learning of a new fine visuomotor skill is unchanged in individuals with a history of illicit stimulant use.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9485079
spellingShingle Gabrielle Todd
Verity Pearson-Dennett
Stanley C. Flavel
Miranda Haberfield
Hannah Edwards
Jason M. White
History of Illicit Stimulant Use Is Not Associated with Long-Lasting Changes in Learning of Fine Motor Skills in Humans
Neural Plasticity
title History of Illicit Stimulant Use Is Not Associated with Long-Lasting Changes in Learning of Fine Motor Skills in Humans
title_full History of Illicit Stimulant Use Is Not Associated with Long-Lasting Changes in Learning of Fine Motor Skills in Humans
title_fullStr History of Illicit Stimulant Use Is Not Associated with Long-Lasting Changes in Learning of Fine Motor Skills in Humans
title_full_unstemmed History of Illicit Stimulant Use Is Not Associated with Long-Lasting Changes in Learning of Fine Motor Skills in Humans
title_short History of Illicit Stimulant Use Is Not Associated with Long-Lasting Changes in Learning of Fine Motor Skills in Humans
title_sort history of illicit stimulant use is not associated with long lasting changes in learning of fine motor skills in humans
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9485079
work_keys_str_mv AT gabrielletodd historyofillicitstimulantuseisnotassociatedwithlonglastingchangesinlearningoffinemotorskillsinhumans
AT veritypearsondennett historyofillicitstimulantuseisnotassociatedwithlonglastingchangesinlearningoffinemotorskillsinhumans
AT stanleycflavel historyofillicitstimulantuseisnotassociatedwithlonglastingchangesinlearningoffinemotorskillsinhumans
AT mirandahaberfield historyofillicitstimulantuseisnotassociatedwithlonglastingchangesinlearningoffinemotorskillsinhumans
AT hannahedwards historyofillicitstimulantuseisnotassociatedwithlonglastingchangesinlearningoffinemotorskillsinhumans
AT jasonmwhite historyofillicitstimulantuseisnotassociatedwithlonglastingchangesinlearningoffinemotorskillsinhumans