On Gastronomic Jurisprudence and Judicial Wellness as a Matter of Competence
For over a century, critics have postulated that a judge’s state of hunger or post-prandial mental state is a determinant of judicial outcomes. This idea, known in contemporary discourse as the ‘judicial breakfast,’ is used as a surrogate of the larger ways in which biases, even if the individual is...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Laws |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/14/3/39 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850168097139326976 |
|---|---|
| author | Alan C. Logan Colleen M. Berryessa Pragya Mishra Susan L. Prescott |
| author_facet | Alan C. Logan Colleen M. Berryessa Pragya Mishra Susan L. Prescott |
| author_sort | Alan C. Logan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | For over a century, critics have postulated that a judge’s state of hunger or post-prandial mental state is a determinant of judicial outcomes. This idea, known in contemporary discourse as the ‘judicial breakfast,’ is used as a surrogate of the larger ways in which biases, even if the individual is not aware of them, influence judicial outcomes. In 2011, the publication of a landmark study paired parole decisions with judicial meal breaks, inviting a literal interpretation of the judicial breakfast. Since that publication, the literature on nutritional neuropsychology has grown rapidly. The findings of these studies are highly relevant to judges experiencing high stress levels, including workload demands and activities within the adversarial system. This stress represents significant harm to an individual judge’s wellbeing, and based on updated findings within neuropsychology, has potential relevance to judicial outcomes. Emergent research indicates that dietary choices and blood/brain glucose have the potential to act as important mediators of decision-making under conditions of stress and fatigue. With proper evidence-based attention, we can better understand the extent to which diet and lifestyle can positively influence judicial wellness and, by extension, support or refute the longstanding assumptions surrounding the “hungry judge effect” and gastronomic jurisprudence. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-f658de0bd0c2448e8d67c33009bb64d6 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2075-471X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-06-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Laws |
| spelling | doaj-art-f658de0bd0c2448e8d67c33009bb64d62025-08-20T02:21:03ZengMDPI AGLaws2075-471X2025-06-011433910.3390/laws14030039On Gastronomic Jurisprudence and Judicial Wellness as a Matter of CompetenceAlan C. Logan0Colleen M. Berryessa1Pragya Mishra2Susan L. Prescott3Nova Institute for Health, Baltimore, MD 21231, USASchool of Criminal Justice Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 123 Washington St, Ste 568, Newark, NJ 07102-3026, USADepartment of Law, Central University of Allahabad, Prayagraj 211002, IndiaMedical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, AustraliaFor over a century, critics have postulated that a judge’s state of hunger or post-prandial mental state is a determinant of judicial outcomes. This idea, known in contemporary discourse as the ‘judicial breakfast,’ is used as a surrogate of the larger ways in which biases, even if the individual is not aware of them, influence judicial outcomes. In 2011, the publication of a landmark study paired parole decisions with judicial meal breaks, inviting a literal interpretation of the judicial breakfast. Since that publication, the literature on nutritional neuropsychology has grown rapidly. The findings of these studies are highly relevant to judges experiencing high stress levels, including workload demands and activities within the adversarial system. This stress represents significant harm to an individual judge’s wellbeing, and based on updated findings within neuropsychology, has potential relevance to judicial outcomes. Emergent research indicates that dietary choices and blood/brain glucose have the potential to act as important mediators of decision-making under conditions of stress and fatigue. With proper evidence-based attention, we can better understand the extent to which diet and lifestyle can positively influence judicial wellness and, by extension, support or refute the longstanding assumptions surrounding the “hungry judge effect” and gastronomic jurisprudence.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/14/3/39competencyjudicial breakfasthungry judge effectburnoutresiliencystress |
| spellingShingle | Alan C. Logan Colleen M. Berryessa Pragya Mishra Susan L. Prescott On Gastronomic Jurisprudence and Judicial Wellness as a Matter of Competence Laws competency judicial breakfast hungry judge effect burnout resiliency stress |
| title | On Gastronomic Jurisprudence and Judicial Wellness as a Matter of Competence |
| title_full | On Gastronomic Jurisprudence and Judicial Wellness as a Matter of Competence |
| title_fullStr | On Gastronomic Jurisprudence and Judicial Wellness as a Matter of Competence |
| title_full_unstemmed | On Gastronomic Jurisprudence and Judicial Wellness as a Matter of Competence |
| title_short | On Gastronomic Jurisprudence and Judicial Wellness as a Matter of Competence |
| title_sort | on gastronomic jurisprudence and judicial wellness as a matter of competence |
| topic | competency judicial breakfast hungry judge effect burnout resiliency stress |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/14/3/39 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT alanclogan ongastronomicjurisprudenceandjudicialwellnessasamatterofcompetence AT colleenmberryessa ongastronomicjurisprudenceandjudicialwellnessasamatterofcompetence AT pragyamishra ongastronomicjurisprudenceandjudicialwellnessasamatterofcompetence AT susanlprescott ongastronomicjurisprudenceandjudicialwellnessasamatterofcompetence |