Visual Outcomes after Implantation of Lucidis EDOF IOL

Purpose. To evaluate the visual performance and clinical outcomes after implantation of Lucidis EDOF IOL following cataract surgery. Design. In this retrospective study, medical records from all enrolled patients were analyzed, and the following information was extracted retrospectively over 3 month...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mark Rabinovich, Gaia Ceresara, Ana Aramburu del Boz, Danial Al Khatib, Marie Crespe, Jerome Bovet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5100861
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832553650319261696
author Mark Rabinovich
Gaia Ceresara
Ana Aramburu del Boz
Danial Al Khatib
Marie Crespe
Jerome Bovet
author_facet Mark Rabinovich
Gaia Ceresara
Ana Aramburu del Boz
Danial Al Khatib
Marie Crespe
Jerome Bovet
author_sort Mark Rabinovich
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. To evaluate the visual performance and clinical outcomes after implantation of Lucidis EDOF IOL following cataract surgery. Design. In this retrospective study, medical records from all enrolled patients were analyzed, and the following information was extracted retrospectively over 3 months following surgery. Materials and Methods. We reviewed retrospectively 181 eyes of 98 patients, who underwent cataract surgery with Lucidis extended depth of focus IOL. Results. 44 patients were males (45%) and 54 were females (55%). The average age of the study population was 68 ± 11 years. The mean preoperative BCVA (logMAR) was 0.19 ± 0.18. The mean root mean square (RMS) high order aberration (HOA) was 0.18 ± 0.1. Monocular BCVA results were 0.02 ± 0.04 (logMAR) and 0.028 ± 0.04 (logMAR) 1 month and 3 months postoperatively, respectively. Between the baseline and 1-month measures, monocular distance BCVA improved by an average of 0.17 ± 0.14 logMAR (p = 0.0001). Between the baseline and 3-month postoperative measures, monocular distance BCVA improved by an average of 0.16 ± 0.13 logMAR (p = 0.0001). Monocular UDVA 1 and 3 months postoperatively was 0.08 ± 0.1 logMAR and 0.067 ± 0.08 logMAR, respectively. 1-Month postoperative binocular UDVA was 0.036 ± 0.05 logMAR, binocular UIVA was 0.1 ± 0.08 logMAR, and binocular UNVA was 0.12 ± 0.14 logMAR. 3-Month postoperative binocular UDVA was 0.038 ± 0.05 logMAR, binocular UIVA was 0.09 ± 0.1 logMAR, and binocular UNVA was 0.16 ± 0.14 logMAR. Conclusions. Lucidis EDOF IOL achieves good visual performances in all distances.
format Article
id doaj-art-f5d253fbe6084dcbad3f603f03f1df4d
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-0058
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-f5d253fbe6084dcbad3f603f03f1df4d2025-02-03T05:53:38ZengWileyJournal of Ophthalmology2090-00582022-01-01202210.1155/2022/5100861Visual Outcomes after Implantation of Lucidis EDOF IOLMark Rabinovich0Gaia Ceresara1Ana Aramburu del Boz2Danial Al Khatib3Marie Crespe4Jerome Bovet5Ophthalmology Network OrganisationOphthalmology Network OrganisationOphthalmology Network OrganisationOphthalmology Network OrganisationOphthalmology Network OrganisationOphthalmology Network OrganisationPurpose. To evaluate the visual performance and clinical outcomes after implantation of Lucidis EDOF IOL following cataract surgery. Design. In this retrospective study, medical records from all enrolled patients were analyzed, and the following information was extracted retrospectively over 3 months following surgery. Materials and Methods. We reviewed retrospectively 181 eyes of 98 patients, who underwent cataract surgery with Lucidis extended depth of focus IOL. Results. 44 patients were males (45%) and 54 were females (55%). The average age of the study population was 68 ± 11 years. The mean preoperative BCVA (logMAR) was 0.19 ± 0.18. The mean root mean square (RMS) high order aberration (HOA) was 0.18 ± 0.1. Monocular BCVA results were 0.02 ± 0.04 (logMAR) and 0.028 ± 0.04 (logMAR) 1 month and 3 months postoperatively, respectively. Between the baseline and 1-month measures, monocular distance BCVA improved by an average of 0.17 ± 0.14 logMAR (p = 0.0001). Between the baseline and 3-month postoperative measures, monocular distance BCVA improved by an average of 0.16 ± 0.13 logMAR (p = 0.0001). Monocular UDVA 1 and 3 months postoperatively was 0.08 ± 0.1 logMAR and 0.067 ± 0.08 logMAR, respectively. 1-Month postoperative binocular UDVA was 0.036 ± 0.05 logMAR, binocular UIVA was 0.1 ± 0.08 logMAR, and binocular UNVA was 0.12 ± 0.14 logMAR. 3-Month postoperative binocular UDVA was 0.038 ± 0.05 logMAR, binocular UIVA was 0.09 ± 0.1 logMAR, and binocular UNVA was 0.16 ± 0.14 logMAR. Conclusions. Lucidis EDOF IOL achieves good visual performances in all distances.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5100861
spellingShingle Mark Rabinovich
Gaia Ceresara
Ana Aramburu del Boz
Danial Al Khatib
Marie Crespe
Jerome Bovet
Visual Outcomes after Implantation of Lucidis EDOF IOL
Journal of Ophthalmology
title Visual Outcomes after Implantation of Lucidis EDOF IOL
title_full Visual Outcomes after Implantation of Lucidis EDOF IOL
title_fullStr Visual Outcomes after Implantation of Lucidis EDOF IOL
title_full_unstemmed Visual Outcomes after Implantation of Lucidis EDOF IOL
title_short Visual Outcomes after Implantation of Lucidis EDOF IOL
title_sort visual outcomes after implantation of lucidis edof iol
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5100861
work_keys_str_mv AT markrabinovich visualoutcomesafterimplantationoflucidisedofiol
AT gaiaceresara visualoutcomesafterimplantationoflucidisedofiol
AT anaaramburudelboz visualoutcomesafterimplantationoflucidisedofiol
AT danialalkhatib visualoutcomesafterimplantationoflucidisedofiol
AT mariecrespe visualoutcomesafterimplantationoflucidisedofiol
AT jeromebovet visualoutcomesafterimplantationoflucidisedofiol