Association between beta‐blocker atenolol use and prostate cancer upgrading in active surveillance1

Abstract Objectives The objective of this study is to investigate the association between the use of beta‐adrenergic antagonist atenolol and risk of pathologic upgrade in patients on active surveillance, considering growing literature implicating adrenergic innervation with disease progression media...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ali H. Zahalka, Ethan Fram, Evan Garden, Lauren Howard, Emily Wiggins, Mustufa Babar, Jay Annam, Allison Reagan, Benjamin Eilender, Amanda deHoedt, Stephen J. Freedland, Ash Tewari, Kara L. Watts
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-11-01
Series:BJUI Compass
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.441
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832592040527921152
author Ali H. Zahalka
Ethan Fram
Evan Garden
Lauren Howard
Emily Wiggins
Mustufa Babar
Jay Annam
Allison Reagan
Benjamin Eilender
Amanda deHoedt
Stephen J. Freedland
Ash Tewari
Kara L. Watts
author_facet Ali H. Zahalka
Ethan Fram
Evan Garden
Lauren Howard
Emily Wiggins
Mustufa Babar
Jay Annam
Allison Reagan
Benjamin Eilender
Amanda deHoedt
Stephen J. Freedland
Ash Tewari
Kara L. Watts
author_sort Ali H. Zahalka
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objectives The objective of this study is to investigate the association between the use of beta‐adrenergic antagonist atenolol and risk of pathologic upgrade in patients on active surveillance, considering growing literature implicating adrenergic innervation with disease progression mediated through beta‐adrenergic signalling. Patients and Methods Men with low‐risk or favourable intermediate‐risk prostate cancer who were placed on an active surveillance protocol between 2006 and 2020 across three diverse urban hospitals were included. Exposure was duration of atenolol use, and outcome was pathologic grade group upgrading (to GG ≥ 3) on final prostate biopsy. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to determine the associations between atenolol use and risk of upgrading with time, on a per‐examination basis. Results A total of 467 men with initial GG ≤ 2 were included. Postdiagnosis atenolol use was associated with a decreased risk of pathologic upgrade to GG ≥ 3 on final repeat biopsy (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.39–0.98). Longer duration of postdiagnosis atenolol use (>2 years) and greater cumulative atenolol dose (>730 defined daily doses) were associated with a more pronounced decreased risk of upgrade to GG ≥ 3 (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.05–0.88, and HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.15–0.99, respectively). Initiation of atenolol use prior to prostate cancer diagnosis had a slightly greater protective effect than drug initiation postdiagnosis (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.43–0.98, and HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.30–0.99, respectively). Conclusions Beta‐adrenergic blockade with atenolol use in men on active surveillance is associated with a reduced risk for clinically significant grade group pathologic upgrade.
format Article
id doaj-art-f57ea34029494f88bb93cf79a944e62a
institution Kabale University
issn 2688-4526
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series BJUI Compass
spelling doaj-art-f57ea34029494f88bb93cf79a944e62a2025-01-22T02:21:03ZengWileyBJUI Compass2688-45262024-11-015111209121410.1002/bco2.441Association between beta‐blocker atenolol use and prostate cancer upgrading in active surveillance1Ali H. Zahalka0Ethan Fram1Evan Garden2Lauren Howard3Emily Wiggins4Mustufa Babar5Jay Annam6Allison Reagan7Benjamin Eilender8Amanda deHoedt9Stephen J. Freedland10Ash Tewari11Kara L. Watts12Department of Urology Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York New York USADepartment of Urology Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center Bronx New York USADepartment of Urology Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York New York USADivision of Urology Cedars‐Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles California USADivision of Urology Cedars‐Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles California USADepartment of Urology Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center Bronx New York USADepartment of Urology Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center Bronx New York USADivision of Urology Cedars‐Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles California USADepartment of Urology Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York New York USASection of Urology Durham VA Medical Center Durham North Carolina USADivision of Urology Cedars‐Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles California USADepartment of Urology Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York New York USADepartment of Urology Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center Bronx New York USAAbstract Objectives The objective of this study is to investigate the association between the use of beta‐adrenergic antagonist atenolol and risk of pathologic upgrade in patients on active surveillance, considering growing literature implicating adrenergic innervation with disease progression mediated through beta‐adrenergic signalling. Patients and Methods Men with low‐risk or favourable intermediate‐risk prostate cancer who were placed on an active surveillance protocol between 2006 and 2020 across three diverse urban hospitals were included. Exposure was duration of atenolol use, and outcome was pathologic grade group upgrading (to GG ≥ 3) on final prostate biopsy. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to determine the associations between atenolol use and risk of upgrading with time, on a per‐examination basis. Results A total of 467 men with initial GG ≤ 2 were included. Postdiagnosis atenolol use was associated with a decreased risk of pathologic upgrade to GG ≥ 3 on final repeat biopsy (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.39–0.98). Longer duration of postdiagnosis atenolol use (>2 years) and greater cumulative atenolol dose (>730 defined daily doses) were associated with a more pronounced decreased risk of upgrade to GG ≥ 3 (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.05–0.88, and HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.15–0.99, respectively). Initiation of atenolol use prior to prostate cancer diagnosis had a slightly greater protective effect than drug initiation postdiagnosis (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.43–0.98, and HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.30–0.99, respectively). Conclusions Beta‐adrenergic blockade with atenolol use in men on active surveillance is associated with a reduced risk for clinically significant grade group pathologic upgrade.https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.441active surveillanceatenololbeta adrenergic blockersbeta adrenergic receptorsprostate cancer
spellingShingle Ali H. Zahalka
Ethan Fram
Evan Garden
Lauren Howard
Emily Wiggins
Mustufa Babar
Jay Annam
Allison Reagan
Benjamin Eilender
Amanda deHoedt
Stephen J. Freedland
Ash Tewari
Kara L. Watts
Association between beta‐blocker atenolol use and prostate cancer upgrading in active surveillance1
BJUI Compass
active surveillance
atenolol
beta adrenergic blockers
beta adrenergic receptors
prostate cancer
title Association between beta‐blocker atenolol use and prostate cancer upgrading in active surveillance1
title_full Association between beta‐blocker atenolol use and prostate cancer upgrading in active surveillance1
title_fullStr Association between beta‐blocker atenolol use and prostate cancer upgrading in active surveillance1
title_full_unstemmed Association between beta‐blocker atenolol use and prostate cancer upgrading in active surveillance1
title_short Association between beta‐blocker atenolol use and prostate cancer upgrading in active surveillance1
title_sort association between beta blocker atenolol use and prostate cancer upgrading in active surveillance1
topic active surveillance
atenolol
beta adrenergic blockers
beta adrenergic receptors
prostate cancer
url https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.441
work_keys_str_mv AT alihzahalka associationbetweenbetablockeratenololuseandprostatecancerupgradinginactivesurveillance1
AT ethanfram associationbetweenbetablockeratenololuseandprostatecancerupgradinginactivesurveillance1
AT evangarden associationbetweenbetablockeratenololuseandprostatecancerupgradinginactivesurveillance1
AT laurenhoward associationbetweenbetablockeratenololuseandprostatecancerupgradinginactivesurveillance1
AT emilywiggins associationbetweenbetablockeratenololuseandprostatecancerupgradinginactivesurveillance1
AT mustufababar associationbetweenbetablockeratenololuseandprostatecancerupgradinginactivesurveillance1
AT jayannam associationbetweenbetablockeratenololuseandprostatecancerupgradinginactivesurveillance1
AT allisonreagan associationbetweenbetablockeratenololuseandprostatecancerupgradinginactivesurveillance1
AT benjamineilender associationbetweenbetablockeratenololuseandprostatecancerupgradinginactivesurveillance1
AT amandadehoedt associationbetweenbetablockeratenololuseandprostatecancerupgradinginactivesurveillance1
AT stephenjfreedland associationbetweenbetablockeratenololuseandprostatecancerupgradinginactivesurveillance1
AT ashtewari associationbetweenbetablockeratenololuseandprostatecancerupgradinginactivesurveillance1
AT karalwatts associationbetweenbetablockeratenololuseandprostatecancerupgradinginactivesurveillance1