DECOLONIALITY OF KNOWLEDGE AND INTERCULTURAL “DAHLEZ”
Khorasanian thinkers believed that, the discovery of their origins and the "Other", is not a single whole act, but rather a procedural, almost stage-by-stage like capacity to understand the world. Evidence suggests that in order to survive (or just grow), one must move from their initial s...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MGIMO University Press
2016-08-01
|
| Series: | Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/583 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832579450846314496 |
|---|---|
| author | N. T. Nurulla-Khodzhaeva |
| author_facet | N. T. Nurulla-Khodzhaeva |
| author_sort | N. T. Nurulla-Khodzhaeva |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Khorasanian thinkers believed that, the discovery of their origins and the "Other", is not a single whole act, but rather a procedural, almost stage-by-stage like capacity to understand the world. Evidence suggests that in order to survive (or just grow), one must move from their initial sphere of life/science to the next. Such mobility was influenced heavily by the tradition of constant crossing of boundaries and countries, formalizing commercial/scientific flexibility of the entire culture of the region. However, this potential remains untapped in the construction of the new history of nations. Therefore it is fair to ask: what is the reason for the lack of dialogue on decolonization of, both within the region (between researchers of different republics), between the Russian and Central Asian researchers, as well as between other regions, ie South-to-South (the Middle East, Latin America, India, etc.). Without doubt, every one of us has worthy of alibi. But it is important to understand that today's distancing from the topic in Central Asia; is not an ideological camouflage ala Soviet-style, but rather a preservation of the myth of Westphalia on the priority of national sovereignty. Finding one's way out of this maze created by the rhetoric of the nations and the logic of coloniality (as Kuidjano) is a very real issue. The first step may be to recognize that our very own knowledge base is colonial. Accordingly, the process must begin with ridding ourselves from this state, starting the process of de-coloniality. To initiate such an understanding, the author proposes to use - dahlez, philosophical concept, put forward with a view to the perception of many values of plural-cycle culture of the region, as well as the values of the outside. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-f520a174277049aeb1229ccc24e1a03b |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2071-8160 2541-9099 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2016-08-01 |
| publisher | MGIMO University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta |
| spelling | doaj-art-f520a174277049aeb1229ccc24e1a03b2025-01-30T12:16:14ZengMGIMO University PressVestnik MGIMO-Universiteta2071-81602541-90992016-08-0104(49)162510.24833/2071-8160-2016-4-49-16-25583DECOLONIALITY OF KNOWLEDGE AND INTERCULTURAL “DAHLEZ”N. T. Nurulla-Khodzhaeva0Oriental Studies Institute of Russian Academy of SciencesKhorasanian thinkers believed that, the discovery of their origins and the "Other", is not a single whole act, but rather a procedural, almost stage-by-stage like capacity to understand the world. Evidence suggests that in order to survive (or just grow), one must move from their initial sphere of life/science to the next. Such mobility was influenced heavily by the tradition of constant crossing of boundaries and countries, formalizing commercial/scientific flexibility of the entire culture of the region. However, this potential remains untapped in the construction of the new history of nations. Therefore it is fair to ask: what is the reason for the lack of dialogue on decolonization of, both within the region (between researchers of different republics), between the Russian and Central Asian researchers, as well as between other regions, ie South-to-South (the Middle East, Latin America, India, etc.). Without doubt, every one of us has worthy of alibi. But it is important to understand that today's distancing from the topic in Central Asia; is not an ideological camouflage ala Soviet-style, but rather a preservation of the myth of Westphalia on the priority of national sovereignty. Finding one's way out of this maze created by the rhetoric of the nations and the logic of coloniality (as Kuidjano) is a very real issue. The first step may be to recognize that our very own knowledge base is colonial. Accordingly, the process must begin with ridding ourselves from this state, starting the process of de-coloniality. To initiate such an understanding, the author proposes to use - dahlez, philosophical concept, put forward with a view to the perception of many values of plural-cycle culture of the region, as well as the values of the outside.https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/583central asiaauthoritycolonialismcolonialityrussiaeuropesubaltern |
| spellingShingle | N. T. Nurulla-Khodzhaeva DECOLONIALITY OF KNOWLEDGE AND INTERCULTURAL “DAHLEZ” Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta central asia authority colonialism coloniality russia europe subaltern |
| title | DECOLONIALITY OF KNOWLEDGE AND INTERCULTURAL “DAHLEZ” |
| title_full | DECOLONIALITY OF KNOWLEDGE AND INTERCULTURAL “DAHLEZ” |
| title_fullStr | DECOLONIALITY OF KNOWLEDGE AND INTERCULTURAL “DAHLEZ” |
| title_full_unstemmed | DECOLONIALITY OF KNOWLEDGE AND INTERCULTURAL “DAHLEZ” |
| title_short | DECOLONIALITY OF KNOWLEDGE AND INTERCULTURAL “DAHLEZ” |
| title_sort | decoloniality of knowledge and intercultural dahlez |
| topic | central asia authority colonialism coloniality russia europe subaltern |
| url | https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/583 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ntnurullakhodzhaeva decolonialityofknowledgeandinterculturaldahlez |