ON THE DISADVANTAGES OF LEGAL REGULATION OF STATE PROGRAMMING AS A TOOL FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLANNED POLICY OF THE STATE
The article discusses problems of determining the place of state programs in the system of state planning documents, a scientific study of the main characteristics of strategic and current planning and their comparison with the main elements of state programs is carried out, a comparative analysis o...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
North-Caucasus Federal University
2021-11-01
|
| Series: | Гуманитарные и юридические исследования |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://humanitieslaw.ncfu.ru/jour/article/view/1078 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846120769444118528 |
|---|---|
| author | L. Postulga |
| author_facet | L. Postulga |
| author_sort | L. Postulga |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The article discusses problems of determining the place of state programs in the system of state planning documents, a scientific study of the main characteristics of strategic and current planning and their comparison with the main elements of state programs is carried out, a comparative analysis of the most common tools of state planning and programming performs. Conclusions and proposals for improving the efficiency of state programming as a tool of public administration are presented. Specific examples of contradictions in the legislation on state programming, the lack of interconnection of benchmarks of goal-setting documents and state programs are considered. It is concluded that the main reason for the low efficiency of state programming is the absence of the main goal-setting document – the Strategy of socio-economic development of the Russian Federation. Proposals are made on the need to adjust the law on strategic planning, eliminate contradictions and gaps in the legislation on state planning and programming, link benchmarks in goal-setting documents and strategies at the level of the macroregion and regions. These conclusions mean a special scientific relevance of the article and can be used by representatives of authorized bodies to solve problems of the effectiveness of state planning. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-f519323749504fe9a363dfd91473dbe5 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2409-1030 |
| language | Russian |
| publishDate | 2021-11-01 |
| publisher | North-Caucasus Federal University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Гуманитарные и юридические исследования |
| spelling | doaj-art-f519323749504fe9a363dfd91473dbe52024-12-16T07:19:42ZrusNorth-Caucasus Federal UniversityГуманитарные и юридические исследования2409-10302021-11-010311311910.37493/2409-1030.2021.3.151066ON THE DISADVANTAGES OF LEGAL REGULATION OF STATE PROGRAMMING AS A TOOL FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLANNED POLICY OF THE STATEL. Postulga0North-Caucasus Federal UniversityThe article discusses problems of determining the place of state programs in the system of state planning documents, a scientific study of the main characteristics of strategic and current planning and their comparison with the main elements of state programs is carried out, a comparative analysis of the most common tools of state planning and programming performs. Conclusions and proposals for improving the efficiency of state programming as a tool of public administration are presented. Specific examples of contradictions in the legislation on state programming, the lack of interconnection of benchmarks of goal-setting documents and state programs are considered. It is concluded that the main reason for the low efficiency of state programming is the absence of the main goal-setting document – the Strategy of socio-economic development of the Russian Federation. Proposals are made on the need to adjust the law on strategic planning, eliminate contradictions and gaps in the legislation on state planning and programming, link benchmarks in goal-setting documents and strategies at the level of the macroregion and regions. These conclusions mean a special scientific relevance of the article and can be used by representatives of authorized bodies to solve problems of the effectiveness of state planning.https://humanitieslaw.ncfu.ru/jour/article/view/1078strategic planningcurrent planningstate planningstate programmingstate program |
| spellingShingle | L. Postulga ON THE DISADVANTAGES OF LEGAL REGULATION OF STATE PROGRAMMING AS A TOOL FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLANNED POLICY OF THE STATE Гуманитарные и юридические исследования strategic planning current planning state planning state programming state program |
| title | ON THE DISADVANTAGES OF LEGAL REGULATION OF STATE PROGRAMMING AS A TOOL FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLANNED POLICY OF THE STATE |
| title_full | ON THE DISADVANTAGES OF LEGAL REGULATION OF STATE PROGRAMMING AS A TOOL FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLANNED POLICY OF THE STATE |
| title_fullStr | ON THE DISADVANTAGES OF LEGAL REGULATION OF STATE PROGRAMMING AS A TOOL FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLANNED POLICY OF THE STATE |
| title_full_unstemmed | ON THE DISADVANTAGES OF LEGAL REGULATION OF STATE PROGRAMMING AS A TOOL FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLANNED POLICY OF THE STATE |
| title_short | ON THE DISADVANTAGES OF LEGAL REGULATION OF STATE PROGRAMMING AS A TOOL FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLANNED POLICY OF THE STATE |
| title_sort | on the disadvantages of legal regulation of state programming as a tool for the implementation of the planned policy of the state |
| topic | strategic planning current planning state planning state programming state program |
| url | https://humanitieslaw.ncfu.ru/jour/article/view/1078 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lpostulga onthedisadvantagesoflegalregulationofstateprogrammingasatoolfortheimplementationoftheplannedpolicyofthestate |