Erectile function rehabilitation with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in patients following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: a comparative efficacy analysis of different course lengths

Introduction. Despite the selective patient screening and improvements in surgical techniques for radical prostatectomy (RP), the incidence of erectile dysfunction (ED) remains relatively high. The efficacy of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i) in patients undergoing nerve-sparing RP can va...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. V. Pomeshkin, M. V. Shamin, B. A. Nejmark
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Rostov State Medical University, State Budget Educational Institute of Higher Professional Education 2025-03-01
Series:Вестник урологии
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/1009
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849250041834766336
author E. V. Pomeshkin
M. V. Shamin
B. A. Nejmark
author_facet E. V. Pomeshkin
M. V. Shamin
B. A. Nejmark
author_sort E. V. Pomeshkin
collection DOAJ
description Introduction. Despite the selective patient screening and improvements in surgical techniques for radical prostatectomy (RP), the incidence of erectile dysfunction (ED) remains relatively high. The efficacy of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i) in patients undergoing nerve-sparing RP can vary from 35% to 75%. One of the issues in penile rehabilitation after RP is its duration. Currently, there are no standardised guidelines on the length of PDE5i therapy, with authors providing conflicting and insufficient data to recommend specific timelines for penile rehabilitation. Therefore, further research is required to determine the optimal duration of PDE5i-based rehabilitation.Objective. To compare the efficacy of long-term PDE-5i administration for restoring erectile function in patients undergoing nerve-sparing RP versus a short 3-month course in the early postoperative period.Materials & methods. A prospective analysis of data from 81 patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent laparoscopic nerve-sparing RP was carried out. In the postoperative period, patients were divided into two groups using simple randomisation. Group 1 received PDE5i for 11 months as part of penile rehabilitation, while group 2 received them for three months.Results. The severity of ED three- and 12-months following RP was comparable in both groups. A long-term course of PDE-5i showed no advantages at the one-year stage of the study in terms of erectile function compared to a threemonth therapy course. The same trend was observed in the results of the nocturnal penile tumescence test. In addition to developing irreversible ED, gradual penile shortening after surgery can cause the patient's inability to urinate while standing and, as a result, lead to serious psychological problems. When assessing the penile length in both groups, a tendency towards its shortening at the annual stage of the study was noted, which indicates insufficient effectiveness of both the annual and three-month rehabilitation course with PDE-5i.Conclusion. Long-term use of PDE-5i compared to a short-term rehabilitation course did not demonstrate any advantages in restoring erectile function one year following nerve-sparing RP.
format Article
id doaj-art-f3b0dfbe2f3f4874aaa4441f87ce986a
institution Kabale University
issn 2308-6424
language Russian
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Rostov State Medical University, State Budget Educational Institute of Higher Professional Education
record_format Article
series Вестник урологии
spelling doaj-art-f3b0dfbe2f3f4874aaa4441f87ce986a2025-08-20T03:57:22ZrusMinistry of Health of Russian Federation, Rostov State Medical University, State Budget Educational Institute of Higher Professional EducationВестник урологии2308-64242025-03-01131394710.21886/2308-6424-2025-13-1-39-47587Erectile function rehabilitation with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in patients following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: a comparative efficacy analysis of different course lengthsE. V. Pomeshkin0M. V. Shamin1B. A. Nejmark2MEDSI St. Petersburg, LLC; Kemerovo State UniversityPodgorbunsky Kuzbass Emergency Clinical HospitalAltai State Medical UniversityIntroduction. Despite the selective patient screening and improvements in surgical techniques for radical prostatectomy (RP), the incidence of erectile dysfunction (ED) remains relatively high. The efficacy of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i) in patients undergoing nerve-sparing RP can vary from 35% to 75%. One of the issues in penile rehabilitation after RP is its duration. Currently, there are no standardised guidelines on the length of PDE5i therapy, with authors providing conflicting and insufficient data to recommend specific timelines for penile rehabilitation. Therefore, further research is required to determine the optimal duration of PDE5i-based rehabilitation.Objective. To compare the efficacy of long-term PDE-5i administration for restoring erectile function in patients undergoing nerve-sparing RP versus a short 3-month course in the early postoperative period.Materials & methods. A prospective analysis of data from 81 patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent laparoscopic nerve-sparing RP was carried out. In the postoperative period, patients were divided into two groups using simple randomisation. Group 1 received PDE5i for 11 months as part of penile rehabilitation, while group 2 received them for three months.Results. The severity of ED three- and 12-months following RP was comparable in both groups. A long-term course of PDE-5i showed no advantages at the one-year stage of the study in terms of erectile function compared to a threemonth therapy course. The same trend was observed in the results of the nocturnal penile tumescence test. In addition to developing irreversible ED, gradual penile shortening after surgery can cause the patient's inability to urinate while standing and, as a result, lead to serious psychological problems. When assessing the penile length in both groups, a tendency towards its shortening at the annual stage of the study was noted, which indicates insufficient effectiveness of both the annual and three-month rehabilitation course with PDE-5i.Conclusion. Long-term use of PDE-5i compared to a short-term rehabilitation course did not demonstrate any advantages in restoring erectile function one year following nerve-sparing RP.https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/1009prostate cancerradical prostatectomy, nerve-sparingerectile functionerectile dysfunctionpenile rehabilitation
spellingShingle E. V. Pomeshkin
M. V. Shamin
B. A. Nejmark
Erectile function rehabilitation with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in patients following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: a comparative efficacy analysis of different course lengths
Вестник урологии
prostate cancer
radical prostatectomy, nerve-sparing
erectile function
erectile dysfunction
penile rehabilitation
title Erectile function rehabilitation with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in patients following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: a comparative efficacy analysis of different course lengths
title_full Erectile function rehabilitation with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in patients following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: a comparative efficacy analysis of different course lengths
title_fullStr Erectile function rehabilitation with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in patients following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: a comparative efficacy analysis of different course lengths
title_full_unstemmed Erectile function rehabilitation with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in patients following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: a comparative efficacy analysis of different course lengths
title_short Erectile function rehabilitation with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in patients following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: a comparative efficacy analysis of different course lengths
title_sort erectile function rehabilitation with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in patients following nerve sparing radical prostatectomy a comparative efficacy analysis of different course lengths
topic prostate cancer
radical prostatectomy, nerve-sparing
erectile function
erectile dysfunction
penile rehabilitation
url https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/1009
work_keys_str_mv AT evpomeshkin erectilefunctionrehabilitationwithphosphodiesterasetype5inhibitorsinpatientsfollowingnervesparingradicalprostatectomyacomparativeefficacyanalysisofdifferentcourselengths
AT mvshamin erectilefunctionrehabilitationwithphosphodiesterasetype5inhibitorsinpatientsfollowingnervesparingradicalprostatectomyacomparativeefficacyanalysisofdifferentcourselengths
AT banejmark erectilefunctionrehabilitationwithphosphodiesterasetype5inhibitorsinpatientsfollowingnervesparingradicalprostatectomyacomparativeefficacyanalysisofdifferentcourselengths