Clinical efficacy of 0.1% cyclosporine A in dry eye patients with inadequate responses to 0.05% cyclosporine A: a switching, prospective, open-label, multicenter study

Abstract Purpose To assess the clinical efficacy of 0.1% cyclosporine A (CsA) in dry eye patients who have shown inadequate responses to previous treatment with 0.05% CsA. Design This study was designed as a switching, prospective, multicenter, 12-week, open-label study. Methods Patients with dry ey...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sook Hyun Yoon, Eun Chul Kim, In-Cheon You, Chul Young Choi, Jae Yong Kim, Jong Suk Song, Joon Young Hyon, Hong Kyun Kim, Kyoung Yul Seo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:BMC Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-03862-x
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832585957069553664
author Sook Hyun Yoon
Eun Chul Kim
In-Cheon You
Chul Young Choi
Jae Yong Kim
Jong Suk Song
Joon Young Hyon
Hong Kyun Kim
Kyoung Yul Seo
author_facet Sook Hyun Yoon
Eun Chul Kim
In-Cheon You
Chul Young Choi
Jae Yong Kim
Jong Suk Song
Joon Young Hyon
Hong Kyun Kim
Kyoung Yul Seo
author_sort Sook Hyun Yoon
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Purpose To assess the clinical efficacy of 0.1% cyclosporine A (CsA) in dry eye patients who have shown inadequate responses to previous treatment with 0.05% CsA. Design This study was designed as a switching, prospective, multicenter, 12-week, open-label study. Methods Patients with dry eye disease (DED), who experienced inadequate responses to at least 3 months of treatment with 0.05% cyclosporine, were enrolled in this study. Clinical evaluations included the National Eye Institute (NEI) corneal and conjunctival staining scores, tear film break-up time (TF-BUT), Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE), ocular discomfort scale (ODS), and tear volume. These parameters were assessed at baseline, and again at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after switching to 0.1% CsA. Results Ninety-one patients were enrolled in the study, and 70 patients completed the trial. Statistical analysis was performed on the full analysis set (FAS) using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method to account for missing data. After switching to 0.1% CsA, subjective symptoms assessed by the Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) and Ocular Discomfort Scale (ODS) showed improvement (p < 0.0001). Objective signs of dry eye, including the National Eye Institute (NEI) score, tear film break-up time (TF-BUT), and tear volume also improved (p < 0.0001). Conclusions In patients with dry eye disease (DED) who exhibited inadequate responses to 0.05% cyclosporine A (CsA), switching to 0.1% CsA resulted in significant improvements in both subjective symptoms and objective clinical signs. This finding suggests that higher concentrations of CsA may be more effective in treating individuals with moderate to severe DED.
format Article
id doaj-art-f39e75ebcf394517a4ab51e914ab3384
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-2415
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-f39e75ebcf394517a4ab51e914ab33842025-01-26T12:21:10ZengBMCBMC Ophthalmology1471-24152025-01-0125111210.1186/s12886-025-03862-xClinical efficacy of 0.1% cyclosporine A in dry eye patients with inadequate responses to 0.05% cyclosporine A: a switching, prospective, open-label, multicenter studySook Hyun Yoon0Eun Chul Kim1In-Cheon You2Chul Young Choi3Jae Yong Kim4Jong Suk Song5Joon Young Hyon6Hong Kyun Kim7Kyoung Yul Seo8Department of Ophthalmology, Daegu Catholic University of MedicineDepartment of Ophthalmology, Bucheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of KoreaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jeonbuk National University Medical SchoolDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of MedicineDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of MedicineDepartment of Ophthalmology, Korea University College of MedicineDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of MedicineDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National UniversityInstitute of Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University College of MedicineAbstract Purpose To assess the clinical efficacy of 0.1% cyclosporine A (CsA) in dry eye patients who have shown inadequate responses to previous treatment with 0.05% CsA. Design This study was designed as a switching, prospective, multicenter, 12-week, open-label study. Methods Patients with dry eye disease (DED), who experienced inadequate responses to at least 3 months of treatment with 0.05% cyclosporine, were enrolled in this study. Clinical evaluations included the National Eye Institute (NEI) corneal and conjunctival staining scores, tear film break-up time (TF-BUT), Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE), ocular discomfort scale (ODS), and tear volume. These parameters were assessed at baseline, and again at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after switching to 0.1% CsA. Results Ninety-one patients were enrolled in the study, and 70 patients completed the trial. Statistical analysis was performed on the full analysis set (FAS) using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method to account for missing data. After switching to 0.1% CsA, subjective symptoms assessed by the Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) and Ocular Discomfort Scale (ODS) showed improvement (p < 0.0001). Objective signs of dry eye, including the National Eye Institute (NEI) score, tear film break-up time (TF-BUT), and tear volume also improved (p < 0.0001). Conclusions In patients with dry eye disease (DED) who exhibited inadequate responses to 0.05% cyclosporine A (CsA), switching to 0.1% CsA resulted in significant improvements in both subjective symptoms and objective clinical signs. This finding suggests that higher concentrations of CsA may be more effective in treating individuals with moderate to severe DED.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-03862-xDry eye diseaseCyclosporine ACationic emulsionSwitchingMulticenter study
spellingShingle Sook Hyun Yoon
Eun Chul Kim
In-Cheon You
Chul Young Choi
Jae Yong Kim
Jong Suk Song
Joon Young Hyon
Hong Kyun Kim
Kyoung Yul Seo
Clinical efficacy of 0.1% cyclosporine A in dry eye patients with inadequate responses to 0.05% cyclosporine A: a switching, prospective, open-label, multicenter study
BMC Ophthalmology
Dry eye disease
Cyclosporine A
Cationic emulsion
Switching
Multicenter study
title Clinical efficacy of 0.1% cyclosporine A in dry eye patients with inadequate responses to 0.05% cyclosporine A: a switching, prospective, open-label, multicenter study
title_full Clinical efficacy of 0.1% cyclosporine A in dry eye patients with inadequate responses to 0.05% cyclosporine A: a switching, prospective, open-label, multicenter study
title_fullStr Clinical efficacy of 0.1% cyclosporine A in dry eye patients with inadequate responses to 0.05% cyclosporine A: a switching, prospective, open-label, multicenter study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical efficacy of 0.1% cyclosporine A in dry eye patients with inadequate responses to 0.05% cyclosporine A: a switching, prospective, open-label, multicenter study
title_short Clinical efficacy of 0.1% cyclosporine A in dry eye patients with inadequate responses to 0.05% cyclosporine A: a switching, prospective, open-label, multicenter study
title_sort clinical efficacy of 0 1 cyclosporine a in dry eye patients with inadequate responses to 0 05 cyclosporine a a switching prospective open label multicenter study
topic Dry eye disease
Cyclosporine A
Cationic emulsion
Switching
Multicenter study
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-03862-x
work_keys_str_mv AT sookhyunyoon clinicalefficacyof01cyclosporineaindryeyepatientswithinadequateresponsesto005cyclosporineaaswitchingprospectiveopenlabelmulticenterstudy
AT eunchulkim clinicalefficacyof01cyclosporineaindryeyepatientswithinadequateresponsesto005cyclosporineaaswitchingprospectiveopenlabelmulticenterstudy
AT incheonyou clinicalefficacyof01cyclosporineaindryeyepatientswithinadequateresponsesto005cyclosporineaaswitchingprospectiveopenlabelmulticenterstudy
AT chulyoungchoi clinicalefficacyof01cyclosporineaindryeyepatientswithinadequateresponsesto005cyclosporineaaswitchingprospectiveopenlabelmulticenterstudy
AT jaeyongkim clinicalefficacyof01cyclosporineaindryeyepatientswithinadequateresponsesto005cyclosporineaaswitchingprospectiveopenlabelmulticenterstudy
AT jongsuksong clinicalefficacyof01cyclosporineaindryeyepatientswithinadequateresponsesto005cyclosporineaaswitchingprospectiveopenlabelmulticenterstudy
AT joonyounghyon clinicalefficacyof01cyclosporineaindryeyepatientswithinadequateresponsesto005cyclosporineaaswitchingprospectiveopenlabelmulticenterstudy
AT hongkyunkim clinicalefficacyof01cyclosporineaindryeyepatientswithinadequateresponsesto005cyclosporineaaswitchingprospectiveopenlabelmulticenterstudy
AT kyoungyulseo clinicalefficacyof01cyclosporineaindryeyepatientswithinadequateresponsesto005cyclosporineaaswitchingprospectiveopenlabelmulticenterstudy