Role of Denosumab and Zoledronic Acid in Geriatric Hip Fractures – A Comparative Analysis

Background: Osteoporotic hip fractures are on the raise in the world. Denosumab and zoledronic acid are among the commonly used current anti-osteoporotic medications to reduce hip fractures. The purpose of the present study was to compare the effectiveness and adverse events of denosumab and zoled...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P Madhuchandra, S Nandeesh, K P Raju
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024-01-01
Series:Journal of Surgical Specialties and Rural Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/jssr/fulltext/2024/05010/role_of_denosumab_and_zoledronic_acid_in_geriatric.5.aspx
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850100243792658432
author P Madhuchandra
S Nandeesh
K P Raju
author_facet P Madhuchandra
S Nandeesh
K P Raju
author_sort P Madhuchandra
collection DOAJ
description Background: Osteoporotic hip fractures are on the raise in the world. Denosumab and zoledronic acid are among the commonly used current anti-osteoporotic medications to reduce hip fractures. The purpose of the present study was to compare the effectiveness and adverse events of denosumab and zoledronic acid in geriatric patients after a hip fracture. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted between February 2020 and May 2021, and a total of 104 patients were included in the study. Fifty-three patients were given subcutaneous (SC) denosumab once in 6 months, and 51 patients were given intravenous (IV) zoledronic acid. The percentage changes in the Bone Mineral Density (BMD) values from the baseline values were compared between both the groups at 0, 12, and 24 months. Results: The percentage increase in lumbar-bone mineral density (L-BMD) was higher significantly in the denosumab group when compared to the zoledronic acid group at 12 months (6.8 ± 0.9 vs. 4.5 ± 0.7; P < 0.01) and 24 months (9.2 ± 0.9 vs. 7.1 ± 0.8; P < 0.001). There was a significant percentage change in the hip-bone mineral density (BMD) in both the groups; however, a higher mean percentage change was noted in the denosumab group when compared to the zoledronic acid group at 12 months and 24 months (P < 0.04 and P < 0.001). Conclusion: We conclude that SC-given denosumab has got a better efficacy on comparison with the IV-given zoledronic acid. Randomized control trials with a large sample size and longer follow-up are required to come to conclusion regarding patient safety, compliance, and persistence.
format Article
id doaj-art-f2c890450df74daa8a65f7abeb784d5a
institution DOAJ
issn 2772-3151
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Surgical Specialties and Rural Practice
spelling doaj-art-f2c890450df74daa8a65f7abeb784d5a2025-08-20T02:40:20ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Surgical Specialties and Rural Practice2772-31512024-01-0151202310.4103/jssrp.jssrp_4_24Role of Denosumab and Zoledronic Acid in Geriatric Hip Fractures – A Comparative AnalysisP MadhuchandraS NandeeshK P RajuBackground: Osteoporotic hip fractures are on the raise in the world. Denosumab and zoledronic acid are among the commonly used current anti-osteoporotic medications to reduce hip fractures. The purpose of the present study was to compare the effectiveness and adverse events of denosumab and zoledronic acid in geriatric patients after a hip fracture. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted between February 2020 and May 2021, and a total of 104 patients were included in the study. Fifty-three patients were given subcutaneous (SC) denosumab once in 6 months, and 51 patients were given intravenous (IV) zoledronic acid. The percentage changes in the Bone Mineral Density (BMD) values from the baseline values were compared between both the groups at 0, 12, and 24 months. Results: The percentage increase in lumbar-bone mineral density (L-BMD) was higher significantly in the denosumab group when compared to the zoledronic acid group at 12 months (6.8 ± 0.9 vs. 4.5 ± 0.7; P < 0.01) and 24 months (9.2 ± 0.9 vs. 7.1 ± 0.8; P < 0.001). There was a significant percentage change in the hip-bone mineral density (BMD) in both the groups; however, a higher mean percentage change was noted in the denosumab group when compared to the zoledronic acid group at 12 months and 24 months (P < 0.04 and P < 0.001). Conclusion: We conclude that SC-given denosumab has got a better efficacy on comparison with the IV-given zoledronic acid. Randomized control trials with a large sample size and longer follow-up are required to come to conclusion regarding patient safety, compliance, and persistence.https://journals.lww.com/jssr/fulltext/2024/05010/role_of_denosumab_and_zoledronic_acid_in_geriatric.5.aspxdenosumab; osteoporosis; zoledronic acid
spellingShingle P Madhuchandra
S Nandeesh
K P Raju
Role of Denosumab and Zoledronic Acid in Geriatric Hip Fractures – A Comparative Analysis
Journal of Surgical Specialties and Rural Practice
denosumab; osteoporosis; zoledronic acid
title Role of Denosumab and Zoledronic Acid in Geriatric Hip Fractures – A Comparative Analysis
title_full Role of Denosumab and Zoledronic Acid in Geriatric Hip Fractures – A Comparative Analysis
title_fullStr Role of Denosumab and Zoledronic Acid in Geriatric Hip Fractures – A Comparative Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Role of Denosumab and Zoledronic Acid in Geriatric Hip Fractures – A Comparative Analysis
title_short Role of Denosumab and Zoledronic Acid in Geriatric Hip Fractures – A Comparative Analysis
title_sort role of denosumab and zoledronic acid in geriatric hip fractures a comparative analysis
topic denosumab; osteoporosis; zoledronic acid
url https://journals.lww.com/jssr/fulltext/2024/05010/role_of_denosumab_and_zoledronic_acid_in_geriatric.5.aspx
work_keys_str_mv AT pmadhuchandra roleofdenosumabandzoledronicacidingeriatrichipfracturesacomparativeanalysis
AT snandeesh roleofdenosumabandzoledronicacidingeriatrichipfracturesacomparativeanalysis
AT kpraju roleofdenosumabandzoledronicacidingeriatrichipfracturesacomparativeanalysis