Fluoroscopic Stenting as a Bridge to Surgery versus Emergency Management for Malignant Obstruction of the Colon

Aim. To investigate the feasibility of a SEMS (self-expandable metallic stent) as a bridge to surgery for malignant colonic obstruction. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 83 patients that were in accordance with inclusion criteria; of these, 33 patients that underwent fluoroscopy-guided SEMS plac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fan Xue, Feng Lin, Jun Zhou, Ning Feng, You-Gang Cui, Xu Zhang, Yu-Peng Yi, Wen-Zhi Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Emergency Medicine International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4650780
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832568679621984256
author Fan Xue
Feng Lin
Jun Zhou
Ning Feng
You-Gang Cui
Xu Zhang
Yu-Peng Yi
Wen-Zhi Liu
author_facet Fan Xue
Feng Lin
Jun Zhou
Ning Feng
You-Gang Cui
Xu Zhang
Yu-Peng Yi
Wen-Zhi Liu
author_sort Fan Xue
collection DOAJ
description Aim. To investigate the feasibility of a SEMS (self-expandable metallic stent) as a bridge to surgery for malignant colonic obstruction. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 83 patients that were in accordance with inclusion criteria; of these, 33 patients that underwent fluoroscopy-guided SEMS placement followed by elective curative resection were classified as a SEMS group and 50 patients, who received emergency surgery (ES), were classified as an ES group. The clinicopathological characteristics, surgery-related parameters, complications, and three-year survival rate were compared between the two groups. Results. No significant differences between the two groups were observed in any of the clinicopathologic characteristics except for higher preoperative absolute neutrophil count in the ES group (P<0.001). Compared to the ES group, the SEMS group has significantly more cases, which featured a laparoscopic approach (72.7% vs. 14.0%, P<0.001), lower overall stoma rate (0% vs. 34.0%, P<0.001), and lower overall postoperative morbidity (27.3% vs. 56.0%, P=0.010). The oncological outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups in terms of three-year overall survival (P=0.125). The technical and clinical success rates of stent placement were 91.7% and 100%, respectively. Conclusion. Patients treated with the stent-surgery approach had significant short-term superiorities and similar long-term outcomes, compared to patients who had emergency surgery alone. The SEMS is, therefore, safe and feasible as a bridge to surgery for malignant colonic obstruction.
format Article
id doaj-art-f2c20124b22e4accacf44798e909af8c
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-2840
2090-2859
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Emergency Medicine International
spelling doaj-art-f2c20124b22e4accacf44798e909af8c2025-02-03T00:58:41ZengWileyEmergency Medicine International2090-28402090-28592020-01-01202010.1155/2020/46507804650780Fluoroscopic Stenting as a Bridge to Surgery versus Emergency Management for Malignant Obstruction of the ColonFan Xue0Feng Lin1Jun Zhou2Ning Feng3You-Gang Cui4Xu Zhang5Yu-Peng Yi6Wen-Zhi Liu7Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian 116001, Liaoning Province, ChinaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian 116001, Liaoning Province, ChinaDepartment of Intervention, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian 116001, Liaoning Province, ChinaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian 116001, Liaoning Province, ChinaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian 116001, Liaoning Province, ChinaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian 116001, Liaoning Province, ChinaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian 116001, Liaoning Province, ChinaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian 116001, Liaoning Province, ChinaAim. To investigate the feasibility of a SEMS (self-expandable metallic stent) as a bridge to surgery for malignant colonic obstruction. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 83 patients that were in accordance with inclusion criteria; of these, 33 patients that underwent fluoroscopy-guided SEMS placement followed by elective curative resection were classified as a SEMS group and 50 patients, who received emergency surgery (ES), were classified as an ES group. The clinicopathological characteristics, surgery-related parameters, complications, and three-year survival rate were compared between the two groups. Results. No significant differences between the two groups were observed in any of the clinicopathologic characteristics except for higher preoperative absolute neutrophil count in the ES group (P<0.001). Compared to the ES group, the SEMS group has significantly more cases, which featured a laparoscopic approach (72.7% vs. 14.0%, P<0.001), lower overall stoma rate (0% vs. 34.0%, P<0.001), and lower overall postoperative morbidity (27.3% vs. 56.0%, P=0.010). The oncological outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups in terms of three-year overall survival (P=0.125). The technical and clinical success rates of stent placement were 91.7% and 100%, respectively. Conclusion. Patients treated with the stent-surgery approach had significant short-term superiorities and similar long-term outcomes, compared to patients who had emergency surgery alone. The SEMS is, therefore, safe and feasible as a bridge to surgery for malignant colonic obstruction.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4650780
spellingShingle Fan Xue
Feng Lin
Jun Zhou
Ning Feng
You-Gang Cui
Xu Zhang
Yu-Peng Yi
Wen-Zhi Liu
Fluoroscopic Stenting as a Bridge to Surgery versus Emergency Management for Malignant Obstruction of the Colon
Emergency Medicine International
title Fluoroscopic Stenting as a Bridge to Surgery versus Emergency Management for Malignant Obstruction of the Colon
title_full Fluoroscopic Stenting as a Bridge to Surgery versus Emergency Management for Malignant Obstruction of the Colon
title_fullStr Fluoroscopic Stenting as a Bridge to Surgery versus Emergency Management for Malignant Obstruction of the Colon
title_full_unstemmed Fluoroscopic Stenting as a Bridge to Surgery versus Emergency Management for Malignant Obstruction of the Colon
title_short Fluoroscopic Stenting as a Bridge to Surgery versus Emergency Management for Malignant Obstruction of the Colon
title_sort fluoroscopic stenting as a bridge to surgery versus emergency management for malignant obstruction of the colon
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4650780
work_keys_str_mv AT fanxue fluoroscopicstentingasabridgetosurgeryversusemergencymanagementformalignantobstructionofthecolon
AT fenglin fluoroscopicstentingasabridgetosurgeryversusemergencymanagementformalignantobstructionofthecolon
AT junzhou fluoroscopicstentingasabridgetosurgeryversusemergencymanagementformalignantobstructionofthecolon
AT ningfeng fluoroscopicstentingasabridgetosurgeryversusemergencymanagementformalignantobstructionofthecolon
AT yougangcui fluoroscopicstentingasabridgetosurgeryversusemergencymanagementformalignantobstructionofthecolon
AT xuzhang fluoroscopicstentingasabridgetosurgeryversusemergencymanagementformalignantobstructionofthecolon
AT yupengyi fluoroscopicstentingasabridgetosurgeryversusemergencymanagementformalignantobstructionofthecolon
AT wenzhiliu fluoroscopicstentingasabridgetosurgeryversusemergencymanagementformalignantobstructionofthecolon