Association of Estimated Glucose Disposal Rate With Risk of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Evidence From a Large-Scale Prospective Cohort Study of the UK Biobank

Background: Insulin resistance has been recognized as a risk factor in the pathogenesis of various diseases. The estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) has been widely validated as a reliable, noninvasive, and cost-effective surrogate measure of insulin resistance. However, the re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuanwei Chen, Ting Zhou, Songyuan Luo, Jizhong Wang, Fan Yang, Yingqing Feng, Lixin Fang, Jianfang Luo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IMR Press 2025-07-01
Series:Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.imrpress.com/journal/RCM/26/7/10.31083/RCM36776
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850038736517070848
author Yuanwei Chen
Ting Zhou
Songyuan Luo
Jizhong Wang
Fan Yang
Yingqing Feng
Lixin Fang
Jianfang Luo
author_facet Yuanwei Chen
Ting Zhou
Songyuan Luo
Jizhong Wang
Fan Yang
Yingqing Feng
Lixin Fang
Jianfang Luo
author_sort Yuanwei Chen
collection DOAJ
description Background: Insulin resistance has been recognized as a risk factor in the pathogenesis of various diseases. The estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) has been widely validated as a reliable, noninvasive, and cost-effective surrogate measure of insulin resistance. However, the relationship between eGDR and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has not yet been fully elucidated. This study sought to investigate the association between the eGDR levels and the risk of AAA development. Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled participants from the UK Biobank who had complete eGDR measurements and no pre-existing AAA at baseline (2006–2010). Participants were stratified into quartiles according to their eGDR values. The association between eGDR and AAA was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models with results expressed as the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Kaplan–Meier curves were generated to visualize cumulative AAA incidence across eGDR quartiles, whereas restricted cubic splines (RCSs) were applied to characterize the exposure–response relationship. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the findings. Results: The final analytical cohort comprised 416,800 participants (median age: 58.0 years (IQR: 50.0–63.0), 45.83% male). During the median follow-up of 13.6 years, 1881 incident AAA cases were recorded. The Kaplan–Meier curve analysis demonstrated a higher cumulative AAA risk with decreasing eGDR quartiles (log-rank p < 0.05). The Multivariable Cox model confirmed that lower eGDR levels were significantly associated with increased AAA risk. When eGDR was assessed as categorical variable, compared with the participants in Quartile 1 group (reference group), the adjusted HR (95% CI) for those in the Quartile 2–Quartile 4 groups were 0.76 (0.66–0.87), 0.69 (0.59–0.80), and 0.46 (0.35–0.62), respectively. When eGDR was evaluated as a continuous variable, a 1-unit increment in eGDR corresponded to a 12% reduction in AAA risk (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.85–0.90). After excluding patients with pre-existing diabetes or short-term follow-up, the sensitivity analysis produced similar results. A subgroup analysis further maintained the association between eGDR and AAA. Furthermore, the RCS curve revealed a nonlinear association between eGDR and AAA incidence risk (p for nonlinearity ≤ 0.05), identifying a threshold value of 7.78. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that reduced eGDR levels are independently associated with elevated AAA risk, exhibiting a nonlinear dose–response relationship characterized by a threshold effect at 7.78. These findings position eGDR as a potentially valuable biomarker for AAA risk stratification and interventional strategies.
format Article
id doaj-art-f151c040d5af4c899f257fd4e71e7563
institution DOAJ
issn 1530-6550
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher IMR Press
record_format Article
series Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
spelling doaj-art-f151c040d5af4c899f257fd4e71e75632025-08-20T02:56:30ZengIMR PressReviews in Cardiovascular Medicine1530-65502025-07-012673677610.31083/RCM36776S1530-6550(25)01860-5Association of Estimated Glucose Disposal Rate With Risk of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Evidence From a Large-Scale Prospective Cohort Study of the UK BiobankYuanwei Chen0Ting Zhou1Songyuan Luo2Jizhong Wang3Fan Yang4Yingqing Feng5Lixin Fang6Jianfang Luo7School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, 510006 Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, 510080 Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, 510080 Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, 510080 Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, 510080 Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, Hypertension Research Laboratory, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, 510080 Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, 510080 Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaSchool of Medicine, South China University of Technology, 510006 Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaBackground: Insulin resistance has been recognized as a risk factor in the pathogenesis of various diseases. The estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) has been widely validated as a reliable, noninvasive, and cost-effective surrogate measure of insulin resistance. However, the relationship between eGDR and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has not yet been fully elucidated. This study sought to investigate the association between the eGDR levels and the risk of AAA development. Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled participants from the UK Biobank who had complete eGDR measurements and no pre-existing AAA at baseline (2006–2010). Participants were stratified into quartiles according to their eGDR values. The association between eGDR and AAA was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models with results expressed as the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Kaplan–Meier curves were generated to visualize cumulative AAA incidence across eGDR quartiles, whereas restricted cubic splines (RCSs) were applied to characterize the exposure–response relationship. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the findings. Results: The final analytical cohort comprised 416,800 participants (median age: 58.0 years (IQR: 50.0–63.0), 45.83% male). During the median follow-up of 13.6 years, 1881 incident AAA cases were recorded. The Kaplan–Meier curve analysis demonstrated a higher cumulative AAA risk with decreasing eGDR quartiles (log-rank p < 0.05). The Multivariable Cox model confirmed that lower eGDR levels were significantly associated with increased AAA risk. When eGDR was assessed as categorical variable, compared with the participants in Quartile 1 group (reference group), the adjusted HR (95% CI) for those in the Quartile 2–Quartile 4 groups were 0.76 (0.66–0.87), 0.69 (0.59–0.80), and 0.46 (0.35–0.62), respectively. When eGDR was evaluated as a continuous variable, a 1-unit increment in eGDR corresponded to a 12% reduction in AAA risk (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.85–0.90). After excluding patients with pre-existing diabetes or short-term follow-up, the sensitivity analysis produced similar results. A subgroup analysis further maintained the association between eGDR and AAA. Furthermore, the RCS curve revealed a nonlinear association between eGDR and AAA incidence risk (p for nonlinearity ≤ 0.05), identifying a threshold value of 7.78. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that reduced eGDR levels are independently associated with elevated AAA risk, exhibiting a nonlinear dose–response relationship characterized by a threshold effect at 7.78. These findings position eGDR as a potentially valuable biomarker for AAA risk stratification and interventional strategies.https://www.imrpress.com/journal/RCM/26/7/10.31083/RCM36776abdominal aortic aneurysmestimated glucose disposal rateinsulin resistancepredictive performance
spellingShingle Yuanwei Chen
Ting Zhou
Songyuan Luo
Jizhong Wang
Fan Yang
Yingqing Feng
Lixin Fang
Jianfang Luo
Association of Estimated Glucose Disposal Rate With Risk of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Evidence From a Large-Scale Prospective Cohort Study of the UK Biobank
Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
abdominal aortic aneurysm
estimated glucose disposal rate
insulin resistance
predictive performance
title Association of Estimated Glucose Disposal Rate With Risk of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Evidence From a Large-Scale Prospective Cohort Study of the UK Biobank
title_full Association of Estimated Glucose Disposal Rate With Risk of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Evidence From a Large-Scale Prospective Cohort Study of the UK Biobank
title_fullStr Association of Estimated Glucose Disposal Rate With Risk of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Evidence From a Large-Scale Prospective Cohort Study of the UK Biobank
title_full_unstemmed Association of Estimated Glucose Disposal Rate With Risk of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Evidence From a Large-Scale Prospective Cohort Study of the UK Biobank
title_short Association of Estimated Glucose Disposal Rate With Risk of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Evidence From a Large-Scale Prospective Cohort Study of the UK Biobank
title_sort association of estimated glucose disposal rate with risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm evidence from a large scale prospective cohort study of the uk biobank
topic abdominal aortic aneurysm
estimated glucose disposal rate
insulin resistance
predictive performance
url https://www.imrpress.com/journal/RCM/26/7/10.31083/RCM36776
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanweichen associationofestimatedglucosedisposalratewithriskofabdominalaorticaneurysmevidencefromalargescaleprospectivecohortstudyoftheukbiobank
AT tingzhou associationofestimatedglucosedisposalratewithriskofabdominalaorticaneurysmevidencefromalargescaleprospectivecohortstudyoftheukbiobank
AT songyuanluo associationofestimatedglucosedisposalratewithriskofabdominalaorticaneurysmevidencefromalargescaleprospectivecohortstudyoftheukbiobank
AT jizhongwang associationofestimatedglucosedisposalratewithriskofabdominalaorticaneurysmevidencefromalargescaleprospectivecohortstudyoftheukbiobank
AT fanyang associationofestimatedglucosedisposalratewithriskofabdominalaorticaneurysmevidencefromalargescaleprospectivecohortstudyoftheukbiobank
AT yingqingfeng associationofestimatedglucosedisposalratewithriskofabdominalaorticaneurysmevidencefromalargescaleprospectivecohortstudyoftheukbiobank
AT lixinfang associationofestimatedglucosedisposalratewithriskofabdominalaorticaneurysmevidencefromalargescaleprospectivecohortstudyoftheukbiobank
AT jianfangluo associationofestimatedglucosedisposalratewithriskofabdominalaorticaneurysmevidencefromalargescaleprospectivecohortstudyoftheukbiobank