Projecting Surface Water Area Under Different Climate and Development Scenarios

Abstract Changes in climate and land‐use/land‐cover will impact surface water dynamics throughout the 21st century and influence global surface water availability. However, most projections of surface water dynamics focus on climate drivers using local‐scale hydrological models, with few studies acc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mollie D. Gaines, Mirela G. Tulbure, Vinicius Perin, Rebecca Composto, Varun Tiwari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-07-01
Series:Earth's Future
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EF004625
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832582851599532032
author Mollie D. Gaines
Mirela G. Tulbure
Vinicius Perin
Rebecca Composto
Varun Tiwari
author_facet Mollie D. Gaines
Mirela G. Tulbure
Vinicius Perin
Rebecca Composto
Varun Tiwari
author_sort Mollie D. Gaines
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Changes in climate and land‐use/land‐cover will impact surface water dynamics throughout the 21st century and influence global surface water availability. However, most projections of surface water dynamics focus on climate drivers using local‐scale hydrological models, with few studies accounting for climate and human drivers such as land‐use/land‐cover change. We used a data‐driven, machine learning model to project seasonal surface water areas (SWAs) in the southeastern U.S. from 2006 to 2099 that combined land‐cover and climate projections under eight different development and emissions scenarios. The model was fitted with historic Landsat imagery, land‐use/land‐cover, and climate observation data (mean squared error 0.14). We assessed the change in SWA for each scenario, and we compared the surface water projections from our data‐driven model and a process‐based model. We found that the scenario with the largest forest‐dominated land cover loss and most extreme climate change had watersheds with the greatest projected increases (in the South Atlantic Gulf) and decreases (in the Lower Mississippi) in SWA. When compared to the increase or decrease in surface water projected by the process‐based model, most of the watersheds across scenarios agreed on the direction of change. Our findings highlight the importance of forest‐dominated land cover in maintaining stable surface water availability throughout the 21st century, which can inform land‐use management policies for adaptation and water‐stress mitigation as well as strategies to prepare for future flood and drought events.
format Article
id doaj-art-f127880b8c8a4ac8a195f2f2f78288e7
institution Kabale University
issn 2328-4277
language English
publishDate 2024-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Earth's Future
spelling doaj-art-f127880b8c8a4ac8a195f2f2f78288e72025-01-29T07:58:53ZengWileyEarth's Future2328-42772024-07-01127n/an/a10.1029/2024EF004625Projecting Surface Water Area Under Different Climate and Development ScenariosMollie D. Gaines0Mirela G. Tulbure1Vinicius Perin2Rebecca Composto3Varun Tiwari4Center for Geospatial Analytics North Carolina State University Raleigh NC USACenter for Geospatial Analytics North Carolina State University Raleigh NC USACenter for Geospatial Analytics North Carolina State University Raleigh NC USACenter for Geospatial Analytics North Carolina State University Raleigh NC USACenter for Geospatial Analytics North Carolina State University Raleigh NC USAAbstract Changes in climate and land‐use/land‐cover will impact surface water dynamics throughout the 21st century and influence global surface water availability. However, most projections of surface water dynamics focus on climate drivers using local‐scale hydrological models, with few studies accounting for climate and human drivers such as land‐use/land‐cover change. We used a data‐driven, machine learning model to project seasonal surface water areas (SWAs) in the southeastern U.S. from 2006 to 2099 that combined land‐cover and climate projections under eight different development and emissions scenarios. The model was fitted with historic Landsat imagery, land‐use/land‐cover, and climate observation data (mean squared error 0.14). We assessed the change in SWA for each scenario, and we compared the surface water projections from our data‐driven model and a process‐based model. We found that the scenario with the largest forest‐dominated land cover loss and most extreme climate change had watersheds with the greatest projected increases (in the South Atlantic Gulf) and decreases (in the Lower Mississippi) in SWA. When compared to the increase or decrease in surface water projected by the process‐based model, most of the watersheds across scenarios agreed on the direction of change. Our findings highlight the importance of forest‐dominated land cover in maintaining stable surface water availability throughout the 21st century, which can inform land‐use management policies for adaptation and water‐stress mitigation as well as strategies to prepare for future flood and drought events.https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EF004625surface waterprojectionland‐use/land‐cover changeclimate changemachine learning
spellingShingle Mollie D. Gaines
Mirela G. Tulbure
Vinicius Perin
Rebecca Composto
Varun Tiwari
Projecting Surface Water Area Under Different Climate and Development Scenarios
Earth's Future
surface water
projection
land‐use/land‐cover change
climate change
machine learning
title Projecting Surface Water Area Under Different Climate and Development Scenarios
title_full Projecting Surface Water Area Under Different Climate and Development Scenarios
title_fullStr Projecting Surface Water Area Under Different Climate and Development Scenarios
title_full_unstemmed Projecting Surface Water Area Under Different Climate and Development Scenarios
title_short Projecting Surface Water Area Under Different Climate and Development Scenarios
title_sort projecting surface water area under different climate and development scenarios
topic surface water
projection
land‐use/land‐cover change
climate change
machine learning
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EF004625
work_keys_str_mv AT molliedgaines projectingsurfacewaterareaunderdifferentclimateanddevelopmentscenarios
AT mirelagtulbure projectingsurfacewaterareaunderdifferentclimateanddevelopmentscenarios
AT viniciusperin projectingsurfacewaterareaunderdifferentclimateanddevelopmentscenarios
AT rebeccacomposto projectingsurfacewaterareaunderdifferentclimateanddevelopmentscenarios
AT varuntiwari projectingsurfacewaterareaunderdifferentclimateanddevelopmentscenarios