Prevalence of rare anatomic variants - publication bias due to selective reporting in meta-analyses studies
Introduction: Meta-analyses of prevalence studies reporting rare anatomic variants are prone to selective reporting of non-null, confirmatory results, thus resulting in publication bias. Aim: We aim to numerically approach this bias and evaluate the most widely used methods for its assessm...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Vasileios Papadopoulos, Dimitrios Filippou, Aliki Fiska |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Pensoft Publishers
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Folia Medica |
| Online Access: | https://foliamedica.bg/article/137881/download/pdf/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Double Cystic Duct as Rare Anatomic Variant
by: Antonio Valero-Liñán, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01) -
The ethmomaxillary sinus: A rare anatomical variant
by: Janine Oosthuizen, MBBCh, FC Rad Diag (SA)
Published: (2025-10-01) -
Anatomical and Histological Analyses of Rare Pancake Kidney
by: Lindsey Koper, et al.
Published: (2024-09-01) -
Bias of selection on human copy-number variants.
by: Duc-Quang Nguyen, et al.
Published: (2006-02-01) -
Publication bias in prevalence studies should not be ignored
by: Masoud Mohammadi
Published: (2025-04-01)