ACCREDIT: Validation of clinical score for progression of COVID-19 while hospitalized
COVID-19 is no longer a global health emergency, but it remains challenging to predict its prognosis. Objective: To develop and validate an instrument to predict COVID-19 progression for critically ill hospitalized patients in a Brazilian population. Methodology: Observational study with retrospecti...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Global Epidemiology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590113324000476 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | COVID-19 is no longer a global health emergency, but it remains challenging to predict its prognosis. Objective: To develop and validate an instrument to predict COVID-19 progression for critically ill hospitalized patients in a Brazilian population. Methodology: Observational study with retrospective follow-up. Participants were consecutively enrolled for treatment in non-critical units between January 1, 2021, to February 28, 2022. They were included if they were adults, with a positive RT-PCR result, history of exposure, or clinical or radiological image findings compatible with COVID-19. The outcome was characterized as either transfer to critical care or death. Predictors such as demographic, clinical, comorbidities, laboratory, and imaging data were collected at hospitalization. A logistic model with lasso or elastic net regularization, a random forest classification model, and a random forest regression model were developed and validated to estimate the risk of disease progression. Results: Out of 301 individuals, the outcome was 41.8 %. The majority of the patients in the study lacked a COVID-19 vaccination. Diabetes mellitus and systemic arterial hypertension were the most common comorbidities. After model development and cross-validation, the Random Forest regression was considered the best approach, and the following eight predictors were retained: D-dimer, Urea, Charlson comorbidity index, pulse oximetry, respiratory frequency, Lactic Dehydrogenase, RDW, and Radiologic RALE score. The model's bias-corrected intercept and slope were − 0.0004 and 1.079 respectively, the average prediction error was 0.028. The ROC AUC curve was 0.795, and the variance explained was 0.289. Conclusion: The prognostic model was considered good enough to be recommended for clinical use in patients during hospitalization (https://pedrobrasil.shinyapps.io/INDWELL/). The clinical benefit and the performance in different scenarios are yet to be known. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2590-1133 |