Comparative Analyses of Lycodon rufozonatus and Lycodon rosozonatus Gut Microbiota in Different Regions

ABSTRACT The interactions between hosts and the gut microbiota are intricate and can significantly affect the ecology and evolution of both parties. Various host traits, including taxonomy, diet, social behaviour, and external factors such as prey availability and the local environment, all play an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fei Zhu, Ke Sun, He Zhang, Jing Lu, Peng Guo, Jiaqi Zhang, Yu Xu, Bing Lyu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-10-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70480
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850132230082396160
author Fei Zhu
Ke Sun
He Zhang
Jing Lu
Peng Guo
Jiaqi Zhang
Yu Xu
Bing Lyu
author_facet Fei Zhu
Ke Sun
He Zhang
Jing Lu
Peng Guo
Jiaqi Zhang
Yu Xu
Bing Lyu
author_sort Fei Zhu
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT The interactions between hosts and the gut microbiota are intricate and can significantly affect the ecology and evolution of both parties. Various host traits, including taxonomy, diet, social behaviour, and external factors such as prey availability and the local environment, all play an important role in shaping composition and diversity of the gut microbiogta. In this study, we explored the impact of intestinal microorganisms on the host in adapting to their respective ecological niches in two species of snakes. We collected feces from Lycodon rufozonatus and Lycodon rosozonatus from different geographical locations and used 16S rRNA gene sequencing technology to sequence the v3‐v4 region. The results revealed that there was no significant difference in the alpha diversity of intestinal microorganisms between L. rufozonatus and L. rosozonatus. The gut microbiota of all individuals comprised four main phyla: Pseudomonadota, Bacteroidota, Bacillota, and Actinomycetota. At the genus level, the genus Salmonella dominated the enterobacterial microbiota in the samples from Hainan, while there was no obvious dominant genus in the enterobacterial microbiota of the samples from the other four localities. Comparative analysis of enzyme families annotated to the gut microbiota between L. rufozonatus and L. rosozonatus from the four sampling regions by CAZy carbohydrate annotation revealed that nine enzyme families differed significantly in terms of glycoside hydrolases (GHs). In addition, we compared the composition of gut microbial communities between L. rufozonatus and L. rosozonatus and investigated the impact of the differences on their functions. Our results will provide insights into the coevolution of host and gut microbes.
format Article
id doaj-art-f09a0b0f59cd447c885bfe82e9ff956d
institution OA Journals
issn 2045-7758
language English
publishDate 2024-10-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecology and Evolution
spelling doaj-art-f09a0b0f59cd447c885bfe82e9ff956d2025-08-20T02:32:15ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582024-10-011410n/an/a10.1002/ece3.70480Comparative Analyses of Lycodon rufozonatus and Lycodon rosozonatus Gut Microbiota in Different RegionsFei Zhu0Ke Sun1He Zhang2Jing Lu3Peng Guo4Jiaqi Zhang5Yu Xu6Bing Lyu7School of Life Sciences Guizhou Normal University Guiyang Guizhou ChinaSchool of Life Sciences Guizhou Normal University Guiyang Guizhou ChinaGuizhou Academy of Forestry Guiyang Guizhou ChinaSchool of Life Sciences Guizhou Normal University Guiyang Guizhou ChinaFaculty of Agriculture, Forestry and Food Engineering Yibin University Yibin Sichuan ChinaFaculty of Agriculture, Forestry and Food Engineering Yibin University Yibin Sichuan ChinaSchool of Life Sciences Guizhou Normal University Guiyang Guizhou ChinaFaculty of Agriculture, Forestry and Food Engineering Yibin University Yibin Sichuan ChinaABSTRACT The interactions between hosts and the gut microbiota are intricate and can significantly affect the ecology and evolution of both parties. Various host traits, including taxonomy, diet, social behaviour, and external factors such as prey availability and the local environment, all play an important role in shaping composition and diversity of the gut microbiogta. In this study, we explored the impact of intestinal microorganisms on the host in adapting to their respective ecological niches in two species of snakes. We collected feces from Lycodon rufozonatus and Lycodon rosozonatus from different geographical locations and used 16S rRNA gene sequencing technology to sequence the v3‐v4 region. The results revealed that there was no significant difference in the alpha diversity of intestinal microorganisms between L. rufozonatus and L. rosozonatus. The gut microbiota of all individuals comprised four main phyla: Pseudomonadota, Bacteroidota, Bacillota, and Actinomycetota. At the genus level, the genus Salmonella dominated the enterobacterial microbiota in the samples from Hainan, while there was no obvious dominant genus in the enterobacterial microbiota of the samples from the other four localities. Comparative analysis of enzyme families annotated to the gut microbiota between L. rufozonatus and L. rosozonatus from the four sampling regions by CAZy carbohydrate annotation revealed that nine enzyme families differed significantly in terms of glycoside hydrolases (GHs). In addition, we compared the composition of gut microbial communities between L. rufozonatus and L. rosozonatus and investigated the impact of the differences on their functions. Our results will provide insights into the coevolution of host and gut microbes.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70480different regionsgut microbiome differencesLycodon rosozonatusLycodon rufozonatusmicrobial diversity
spellingShingle Fei Zhu
Ke Sun
He Zhang
Jing Lu
Peng Guo
Jiaqi Zhang
Yu Xu
Bing Lyu
Comparative Analyses of Lycodon rufozonatus and Lycodon rosozonatus Gut Microbiota in Different Regions
Ecology and Evolution
different regions
gut microbiome differences
Lycodon rosozonatus
Lycodon rufozonatus
microbial diversity
title Comparative Analyses of Lycodon rufozonatus and Lycodon rosozonatus Gut Microbiota in Different Regions
title_full Comparative Analyses of Lycodon rufozonatus and Lycodon rosozonatus Gut Microbiota in Different Regions
title_fullStr Comparative Analyses of Lycodon rufozonatus and Lycodon rosozonatus Gut Microbiota in Different Regions
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analyses of Lycodon rufozonatus and Lycodon rosozonatus Gut Microbiota in Different Regions
title_short Comparative Analyses of Lycodon rufozonatus and Lycodon rosozonatus Gut Microbiota in Different Regions
title_sort comparative analyses of lycodon rufozonatus and lycodon rosozonatus gut microbiota in different regions
topic different regions
gut microbiome differences
Lycodon rosozonatus
Lycodon rufozonatus
microbial diversity
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70480
work_keys_str_mv AT feizhu comparativeanalysesoflycodonrufozonatusandlycodonrosozonatusgutmicrobiotaindifferentregions
AT kesun comparativeanalysesoflycodonrufozonatusandlycodonrosozonatusgutmicrobiotaindifferentregions
AT hezhang comparativeanalysesoflycodonrufozonatusandlycodonrosozonatusgutmicrobiotaindifferentregions
AT jinglu comparativeanalysesoflycodonrufozonatusandlycodonrosozonatusgutmicrobiotaindifferentregions
AT pengguo comparativeanalysesoflycodonrufozonatusandlycodonrosozonatusgutmicrobiotaindifferentregions
AT jiaqizhang comparativeanalysesoflycodonrufozonatusandlycodonrosozonatusgutmicrobiotaindifferentregions
AT yuxu comparativeanalysesoflycodonrufozonatusandlycodonrosozonatusgutmicrobiotaindifferentregions
AT binglyu comparativeanalysesoflycodonrufozonatusandlycodonrosozonatusgutmicrobiotaindifferentregions