Technological and economical potential of anaerobic-adding raw wastewater-intermittent aeration process for treatment of piggery wastewater

A technological and economical comparison between the anaerobic-adding raw wastewater-intermittent aeration (Anarwia) process and the anaerobic-Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) process and SBR process was carried out. The result of laboratory-and full-scale experiment showed it was not technologically...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: DENG Liang-wei, ZHENG Ping, CHEN Zi-ai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Zhejiang University Press 2004-11-01
Series:浙江大学学报. 农业与生命科学版
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.academax.com/doi/10.3785/1008-9209.2004.06.0628
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850069846236069888
author DENG Liang-wei
ZHENG Ping
CHEN Zi-ai
author_facet DENG Liang-wei
ZHENG Ping
CHEN Zi-ai
author_sort DENG Liang-wei
collection DOAJ
description A technological and economical comparison between the anaerobic-adding raw wastewater-intermittent aeration (Anarwia) process and the anaerobic-Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) process and SBR process was carried out. The result of laboratory-and full-scale experiment showed it was not technologically feasible to apply the anaerobic-SBR process to treatment of piggery wastewater because of poor efficiency of pollutant removal from wastewater and higher amount of pollutant remnant in the effluent. The performance of Anarwia process was similar to that of the SBR process, with however more efficient removal of pollutant and relatively lower concentration of pollutant in the effluent, which meet the national wastewater discharge standard. The hydraulic retention time (HRT), investment, sludge yield and oxygen demand for the Anarwia process were respectively 38.6%, 11.8%, 16.4% and 95.9% lower than those for SBR process. During the treatment with the Anarwia process, biogas of 2784 m<sup>3</sup>/d was produced. If the biogas was not taken into account, the operation cost for the Anarwia process was 47.5% lower than that for the SBR process. If taken into account, the operation cost for the former was only 9.1% of the latter. The technological and economical analysis indicated that Anarwia process is a stable, high-removal, cost-efficient and novel process, and is a prospective substitution for SBR process in treatment of piggery wastewater.
format Article
id doaj-art-f0769c07dcbc43ac9570da2faebe11d8
institution DOAJ
issn 1008-9209
2097-5155
language English
publishDate 2004-11-01
publisher Zhejiang University Press
record_format Article
series 浙江大学学报. 农业与生命科学版
spelling doaj-art-f0769c07dcbc43ac9570da2faebe11d82025-08-20T02:47:40ZengZhejiang University Press浙江大学学报. 农业与生命科学版1008-92092097-51552004-11-013062863410.3785/1008-9209.2004.06.062810089209Technological and economical potential of anaerobic-adding raw wastewater-intermittent aeration process for treatment of piggery wastewaterDENG Liang-weiZHENG PingCHEN Zi-aiA technological and economical comparison between the anaerobic-adding raw wastewater-intermittent aeration (Anarwia) process and the anaerobic-Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) process and SBR process was carried out. The result of laboratory-and full-scale experiment showed it was not technologically feasible to apply the anaerobic-SBR process to treatment of piggery wastewater because of poor efficiency of pollutant removal from wastewater and higher amount of pollutant remnant in the effluent. The performance of Anarwia process was similar to that of the SBR process, with however more efficient removal of pollutant and relatively lower concentration of pollutant in the effluent, which meet the national wastewater discharge standard. The hydraulic retention time (HRT), investment, sludge yield and oxygen demand for the Anarwia process were respectively 38.6%, 11.8%, 16.4% and 95.9% lower than those for SBR process. During the treatment with the Anarwia process, biogas of 2784 m<sup>3</sup>/d was produced. If the biogas was not taken into account, the operation cost for the Anarwia process was 47.5% lower than that for the SBR process. If taken into account, the operation cost for the former was only 9.1% of the latter. The technological and economical analysis indicated that Anarwia process is a stable, high-removal, cost-efficient and novel process, and is a prospective substitution for SBR process in treatment of piggery wastewater.https://www.academax.com/doi/10.3785/1008-9209.2004.06.0628piggery wastewateranaerobic digestsequencing batch reactoranaerobic-adding raw wastewater-intermittent aeration (Anarwia)technological feasibilityeconomical feasibility
spellingShingle DENG Liang-wei
ZHENG Ping
CHEN Zi-ai
Technological and economical potential of anaerobic-adding raw wastewater-intermittent aeration process for treatment of piggery wastewater
浙江大学学报. 农业与生命科学版
piggery wastewater
anaerobic digest
sequencing batch reactor
anaerobic-adding raw wastewater-intermittent aeration (Anarwia)
technological feasibility
economical feasibility
title Technological and economical potential of anaerobic-adding raw wastewater-intermittent aeration process for treatment of piggery wastewater
title_full Technological and economical potential of anaerobic-adding raw wastewater-intermittent aeration process for treatment of piggery wastewater
title_fullStr Technological and economical potential of anaerobic-adding raw wastewater-intermittent aeration process for treatment of piggery wastewater
title_full_unstemmed Technological and economical potential of anaerobic-adding raw wastewater-intermittent aeration process for treatment of piggery wastewater
title_short Technological and economical potential of anaerobic-adding raw wastewater-intermittent aeration process for treatment of piggery wastewater
title_sort technological and economical potential of anaerobic adding raw wastewater intermittent aeration process for treatment of piggery wastewater
topic piggery wastewater
anaerobic digest
sequencing batch reactor
anaerobic-adding raw wastewater-intermittent aeration (Anarwia)
technological feasibility
economical feasibility
url https://www.academax.com/doi/10.3785/1008-9209.2004.06.0628
work_keys_str_mv AT dengliangwei technologicalandeconomicalpotentialofanaerobicaddingrawwastewaterintermittentaerationprocessfortreatmentofpiggerywastewater
AT zhengping technologicalandeconomicalpotentialofanaerobicaddingrawwastewaterintermittentaerationprocessfortreatmentofpiggerywastewater
AT chenziai technologicalandeconomicalpotentialofanaerobicaddingrawwastewaterintermittentaerationprocessfortreatmentofpiggerywastewater