How does Legalization alter Islamists’ Electoral Strategies? A Comparative Study of Mauritania’s Tawassoul Party in the 2006 and 2013 Local Elections

This study examines the Islamist political party in Mauritania, the National Rally for Reform and Development (Tawassoul) which ran candidates in the local elections of 2006 and 2013, respectively, both as a banned party and unbanned party (after legalization in 2007). Drawing on original data colle...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Matt Buehler
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: CNRS Éditions 2020-12-01
Series:L’Année du Maghreb
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/anneemaghreb/6768
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832581830566477824
author Matt Buehler
author_facet Matt Buehler
author_sort Matt Buehler
collection DOAJ
description This study examines the Islamist political party in Mauritania, the National Rally for Reform and Development (Tawassoul) which ran candidates in the local elections of 2006 and 2013, respectively, both as a banned party and unbanned party (after legalization in 2007). Drawing on original data collected during fieldwork in Mauritania, and also using Arabic interviews with Tawassoul politicians, this study compares variation in Islamists’ electoral strategies during their period of illegality compared with their period of legality. As a banned party competing in 2006, Mauritania’s Islamists focused on running candidates in districts of their traditional supporters, urban and religious voters. However, after the Islamist party gained legalization, its candidates for the 2013 elections concentrated less exclusively on urban areas, becoming statistically neither more nor less likely to compete in urban districts than rural ones. Moreover, Islamists candidates became statistically more likely to try to gain a brand-new, unprecedented political foothold in rural districts. This study concludes by positing a potential explanation, focusing on the party’s desire to attract support from marginalized social groups based in rural areas, especially Haratine voters.
format Article
id doaj-art-f0627a6d1a0a48859edd4eb18439a27e
institution Kabale University
issn 1952-8108
2109-9405
language fra
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher CNRS Éditions
record_format Article
series L’Année du Maghreb
spelling doaj-art-f0627a6d1a0a48859edd4eb18439a27e2025-01-30T09:56:30ZfraCNRS ÉditionsL’Année du Maghreb1952-81082109-94052020-12-012330332310.4000/anneemaghreb.6768How does Legalization alter Islamists’ Electoral Strategies? A Comparative Study of Mauritania’s Tawassoul Party in the 2006 and 2013 Local ElectionsMatt BuehlerThis study examines the Islamist political party in Mauritania, the National Rally for Reform and Development (Tawassoul) which ran candidates in the local elections of 2006 and 2013, respectively, both as a banned party and unbanned party (after legalization in 2007). Drawing on original data collected during fieldwork in Mauritania, and also using Arabic interviews with Tawassoul politicians, this study compares variation in Islamists’ electoral strategies during their period of illegality compared with their period of legality. As a banned party competing in 2006, Mauritania’s Islamists focused on running candidates in districts of their traditional supporters, urban and religious voters. However, after the Islamist party gained legalization, its candidates for the 2013 elections concentrated less exclusively on urban areas, becoming statistically neither more nor less likely to compete in urban districts than rural ones. Moreover, Islamists candidates became statistically more likely to try to gain a brand-new, unprecedented political foothold in rural districts. This study concludes by positing a potential explanation, focusing on the party’s desire to attract support from marginalized social groups based in rural areas, especially Haratine voters.https://journals.openedition.org/anneemaghreb/6768MauritaniaIslamist partieslocal electionsTawassoul PartyHaratine.
spellingShingle Matt Buehler
How does Legalization alter Islamists’ Electoral Strategies? A Comparative Study of Mauritania’s Tawassoul Party in the 2006 and 2013 Local Elections
L’Année du Maghreb
Mauritania
Islamist parties
local elections
Tawassoul Party
Haratine.
title How does Legalization alter Islamists’ Electoral Strategies? A Comparative Study of Mauritania’s Tawassoul Party in the 2006 and 2013 Local Elections
title_full How does Legalization alter Islamists’ Electoral Strategies? A Comparative Study of Mauritania’s Tawassoul Party in the 2006 and 2013 Local Elections
title_fullStr How does Legalization alter Islamists’ Electoral Strategies? A Comparative Study of Mauritania’s Tawassoul Party in the 2006 and 2013 Local Elections
title_full_unstemmed How does Legalization alter Islamists’ Electoral Strategies? A Comparative Study of Mauritania’s Tawassoul Party in the 2006 and 2013 Local Elections
title_short How does Legalization alter Islamists’ Electoral Strategies? A Comparative Study of Mauritania’s Tawassoul Party in the 2006 and 2013 Local Elections
title_sort how does legalization alter islamists electoral strategies a comparative study of mauritania s tawassoul party in the 2006 and 2013 local elections
topic Mauritania
Islamist parties
local elections
Tawassoul Party
Haratine.
url https://journals.openedition.org/anneemaghreb/6768
work_keys_str_mv AT mattbuehler howdoeslegalizationalterislamistselectoralstrategiesacomparativestudyofmauritaniastawassoulpartyinthe2006and2013localelections