Impact of moral distress on burn-out: a cross-sectional survey of front-line family physicians during the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic

Objectives Primary care clinicians are especially prone to burn-out. The primary objective of this study was to investigate factors contributing to burn-out and moral distress and their relationship among practising family physicians (FPs) in California early in the COVID-19 pandemic.Design Cross-se...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John Billimek, Johanna Shapiro, Cynthia Haq, Tan Nguyen, Avital Sabrina Fischer, Reece Fenning, John Michael Robb, Allison Slater, Uyen Mai, Tien Lam, Jan Paolo De La Cruz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2025-02-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/2/e089980.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1825197133950615552
author John Billimek
Johanna Shapiro
Cynthia Haq
Tan Nguyen
Avital Sabrina Fischer
Reece Fenning
John Michael Robb
Allison Slater
Uyen Mai
Tien Lam
Jan Paolo De La Cruz
author_facet John Billimek
Johanna Shapiro
Cynthia Haq
Tan Nguyen
Avital Sabrina Fischer
Reece Fenning
John Michael Robb
Allison Slater
Uyen Mai
Tien Lam
Jan Paolo De La Cruz
author_sort John Billimek
collection DOAJ
description Objectives Primary care clinicians are especially prone to burn-out. The primary objective of this study was to investigate factors contributing to burn-out and moral distress and their relationship among practising family physicians (FPs) in California early in the COVID-19 pandemic.Design Cross-sectional study, online survey evaluating burn-out, moral distress and associated factors.Setting California FPs between July and August 2020 practising in community health centres, hospital systems, private clinics and university systems were surveyed with a 22-item online questionnaire.Participants FPs practising in California were eligible. The final sample included 218 physicians.Primary and secondary outcome measures The primary independent variable was frequency of moral distress and the primary outcome variable was worsening burn-out. Moderator variables included gender and employer support.Results FPs experiencing higher burn-out and moral distress were more likely to report concerns regarding personal COVID-19 risk and lack of personal protective equipment. Practising self-care and personal wellness were associated with decreased moral distress. Female physicians were 3.86-fold more likely to report worsening burn-out compared with male physicians. Employer support was associated with a 59% reduced burn-out risk and 54% reduction in frequent moral distress. Frequent moral distress was associated with a 3.12- fold higher burn-out risk. Gender moderated the relationship between moral distress and burn-out. Moral distress was associated with a 3.55-fold increase in burn-out risk among females.Conclusions Female FPs experienced greater levels of moral distress and burn-out than male physicians. Moral distress was differentially associated with increased burn-out among female physicians. Employer support was a protective factor against moral distress and burn-out.
format Article
id doaj-art-f02d471a7d6d4aaf91361ae17faf41ad
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-f02d471a7d6d4aaf91361ae17faf41ad2025-02-11T20:00:10ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552025-02-0115210.1136/bmjopen-2024-089980Impact of moral distress on burn-out: a cross-sectional survey of front-line family physicians during the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemicJohn Billimek0Johanna Shapiro1Cynthia Haq2Tan Nguyen3Avital Sabrina Fischer4Reece Fenning5John Michael Robb6Allison Slater7Uyen Mai8Tien Lam9Jan Paolo De La Cruz105 Health Policy Research Institute, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USAprofessor2 Family Medicine, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California, USAPatAI, Boston, MA, USA1 Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California, USA2 Family Medicine, Sutter Health, Sacramento, California, USA3 School of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA2 Family Medicine, Sutter Health, Sacramento, California, USA4 Department of Public Health, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA4 Department of Public Health, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA4 Department of Public Health, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USAObjectives Primary care clinicians are especially prone to burn-out. The primary objective of this study was to investigate factors contributing to burn-out and moral distress and their relationship among practising family physicians (FPs) in California early in the COVID-19 pandemic.Design Cross-sectional study, online survey evaluating burn-out, moral distress and associated factors.Setting California FPs between July and August 2020 practising in community health centres, hospital systems, private clinics and university systems were surveyed with a 22-item online questionnaire.Participants FPs practising in California were eligible. The final sample included 218 physicians.Primary and secondary outcome measures The primary independent variable was frequency of moral distress and the primary outcome variable was worsening burn-out. Moderator variables included gender and employer support.Results FPs experiencing higher burn-out and moral distress were more likely to report concerns regarding personal COVID-19 risk and lack of personal protective equipment. Practising self-care and personal wellness were associated with decreased moral distress. Female physicians were 3.86-fold more likely to report worsening burn-out compared with male physicians. Employer support was associated with a 59% reduced burn-out risk and 54% reduction in frequent moral distress. Frequent moral distress was associated with a 3.12- fold higher burn-out risk. Gender moderated the relationship between moral distress and burn-out. Moral distress was associated with a 3.55-fold increase in burn-out risk among females.Conclusions Female FPs experienced greater levels of moral distress and burn-out than male physicians. Moral distress was differentially associated with increased burn-out among female physicians. Employer support was a protective factor against moral distress and burn-out.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/2/e089980.full
spellingShingle John Billimek
Johanna Shapiro
Cynthia Haq
Tan Nguyen
Avital Sabrina Fischer
Reece Fenning
John Michael Robb
Allison Slater
Uyen Mai
Tien Lam
Jan Paolo De La Cruz
Impact of moral distress on burn-out: a cross-sectional survey of front-line family physicians during the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic
BMJ Open
title Impact of moral distress on burn-out: a cross-sectional survey of front-line family physicians during the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full Impact of moral distress on burn-out: a cross-sectional survey of front-line family physicians during the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic
title_fullStr Impact of moral distress on burn-out: a cross-sectional survey of front-line family physicians during the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Impact of moral distress on burn-out: a cross-sectional survey of front-line family physicians during the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic
title_short Impact of moral distress on burn-out: a cross-sectional survey of front-line family physicians during the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic
title_sort impact of moral distress on burn out a cross sectional survey of front line family physicians during the initial wave of the covid 19 pandemic
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/2/e089980.full
work_keys_str_mv AT johnbillimek impactofmoraldistressonburnoutacrosssectionalsurveyoffrontlinefamilyphysiciansduringtheinitialwaveofthecovid19pandemic
AT johannashapiro impactofmoraldistressonburnoutacrosssectionalsurveyoffrontlinefamilyphysiciansduringtheinitialwaveofthecovid19pandemic
AT cynthiahaq impactofmoraldistressonburnoutacrosssectionalsurveyoffrontlinefamilyphysiciansduringtheinitialwaveofthecovid19pandemic
AT tannguyen impactofmoraldistressonburnoutacrosssectionalsurveyoffrontlinefamilyphysiciansduringtheinitialwaveofthecovid19pandemic
AT avitalsabrinafischer impactofmoraldistressonburnoutacrosssectionalsurveyoffrontlinefamilyphysiciansduringtheinitialwaveofthecovid19pandemic
AT reecefenning impactofmoraldistressonburnoutacrosssectionalsurveyoffrontlinefamilyphysiciansduringtheinitialwaveofthecovid19pandemic
AT johnmichaelrobb impactofmoraldistressonburnoutacrosssectionalsurveyoffrontlinefamilyphysiciansduringtheinitialwaveofthecovid19pandemic
AT allisonslater impactofmoraldistressonburnoutacrosssectionalsurveyoffrontlinefamilyphysiciansduringtheinitialwaveofthecovid19pandemic
AT uyenmai impactofmoraldistressonburnoutacrosssectionalsurveyoffrontlinefamilyphysiciansduringtheinitialwaveofthecovid19pandemic
AT tienlam impactofmoraldistressonburnoutacrosssectionalsurveyoffrontlinefamilyphysiciansduringtheinitialwaveofthecovid19pandemic
AT janpaolodelacruz impactofmoraldistressonburnoutacrosssectionalsurveyoffrontlinefamilyphysiciansduringtheinitialwaveofthecovid19pandemic