Perspectives on content and delivery of the ABLE 1.0 intervention programme
Background The occupational therapy intervention programme ABLE 1.0 was designed to enhance the ability to perform activities of daily living in persons living with chronic conditions. There is a need to determine if content and delivery of the ABLE 1.0 are acceptable among occupational therapists (...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/11038128.2024.2394644 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832587184366944256 |
|---|---|
| author | Kristina Tomra Nielsen Marie Bangsgaard Bang Marc Sampedro Pilegaard Vita Hagelskjær Eva Ejlersen Wæhrens |
| author_facet | Kristina Tomra Nielsen Marie Bangsgaard Bang Marc Sampedro Pilegaard Vita Hagelskjær Eva Ejlersen Wæhrens |
| author_sort | Kristina Tomra Nielsen |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background The occupational therapy intervention programme ABLE 1.0 was designed to enhance the ability to perform activities of daily living in persons living with chronic conditions. There is a need to determine if content and delivery of the ABLE 1.0 are acceptable among occupational therapists (OTs) and clients after having delivered or received the programme, respectively.Objectives The paper reports on evaluation of content and delivery of the ABLE 1.0 among OTs and clients. This, in terms of acceptability of intervention in principle, and perceived value, benefits, harms, or unintended consequences of the intervention.Material and methods Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with OTs having delivered and clients having received ABLE 1.0 in a Danish municipality. Content analysis was performed.Findings Two OTs and three clients participated. Analyses revealed six categories related to content and delivery; ‘Overall perception of the programme’; ‘Potential for implementation’; ‘Evaluation, goal setting and clarification of reasons for ADL task performance problems’; ‘Intervention: compensatory solutions’; ‘Format and duration’ and ‘Preconditions for delivery’.Conclusions and significance The findings provided valuable information used for further development of the ABLE programme. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-eff682e755cf498a8ffa7e897797d218 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1103-8128 1651-2014 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy |
| spelling | doaj-art-eff682e755cf498a8ffa7e897797d2182025-01-24T17:53:19ZengTaylor & Francis GroupScandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy1103-81281651-20142024-12-0131110.1080/11038128.2024.2394644Perspectives on content and delivery of the ABLE 1.0 intervention programmeKristina Tomra Nielsen0Marie Bangsgaard Bang1Marc Sampedro Pilegaard2Vita Hagelskjær3Eva Ejlersen Wæhrens4Department of Occupational Therapy, University College of Northern Denmark, Aalborg, DenmarkDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University College of Northern Denmark, Aalborg, DenmarkDEFACTUM, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, DenmarkOccupation-Centered Occupational Therapy, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkOccupation-Centered Occupational Therapy, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkBackground The occupational therapy intervention programme ABLE 1.0 was designed to enhance the ability to perform activities of daily living in persons living with chronic conditions. There is a need to determine if content and delivery of the ABLE 1.0 are acceptable among occupational therapists (OTs) and clients after having delivered or received the programme, respectively.Objectives The paper reports on evaluation of content and delivery of the ABLE 1.0 among OTs and clients. This, in terms of acceptability of intervention in principle, and perceived value, benefits, harms, or unintended consequences of the intervention.Material and methods Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with OTs having delivered and clients having received ABLE 1.0 in a Danish municipality. Content analysis was performed.Findings Two OTs and three clients participated. Analyses revealed six categories related to content and delivery; ‘Overall perception of the programme’; ‘Potential for implementation’; ‘Evaluation, goal setting and clarification of reasons for ADL task performance problems’; ‘Intervention: compensatory solutions’; ‘Format and duration’ and ‘Preconditions for delivery’.Conclusions and significance The findings provided valuable information used for further development of the ABLE programme.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/11038128.2024.2394644Activities of daily livingcomplex interventionsfeasibilityoccupational therapy |
| spellingShingle | Kristina Tomra Nielsen Marie Bangsgaard Bang Marc Sampedro Pilegaard Vita Hagelskjær Eva Ejlersen Wæhrens Perspectives on content and delivery of the ABLE 1.0 intervention programme Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy Activities of daily living complex interventions feasibility occupational therapy |
| title | Perspectives on content and delivery of the ABLE 1.0 intervention programme |
| title_full | Perspectives on content and delivery of the ABLE 1.0 intervention programme |
| title_fullStr | Perspectives on content and delivery of the ABLE 1.0 intervention programme |
| title_full_unstemmed | Perspectives on content and delivery of the ABLE 1.0 intervention programme |
| title_short | Perspectives on content and delivery of the ABLE 1.0 intervention programme |
| title_sort | perspectives on content and delivery of the able 1 0 intervention programme |
| topic | Activities of daily living complex interventions feasibility occupational therapy |
| url | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/11038128.2024.2394644 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kristinatomranielsen perspectivesoncontentanddeliveryoftheable10interventionprogramme AT mariebangsgaardbang perspectivesoncontentanddeliveryoftheable10interventionprogramme AT marcsampedropilegaard perspectivesoncontentanddeliveryoftheable10interventionprogramme AT vitahagelskjær perspectivesoncontentanddeliveryoftheable10interventionprogramme AT evaejlersenwæhrens perspectivesoncontentanddeliveryoftheable10interventionprogramme |