Two-phase treatment of an Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion

This case report describes a two-phase approach to the treatment of an Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion in a growing boy. The first phase utilised a functional appliance (Clark Twin Blocks) du ring puberty and achieved a pleasing improvement in the facial profile. The second phase involved a f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rapaport Morris
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 1998-03-01
Series:Australasian Orthodontic Journal
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-1998-0006
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850084369836802048
author Rapaport Morris
author_facet Rapaport Morris
author_sort Rapaport Morris
collection DOAJ
description This case report describes a two-phase approach to the treatment of an Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion in a growing boy. The first phase utilised a functional appliance (Clark Twin Blocks) du ring puberty and achieved a pleasing improvement in the facial profile. The second phase involved a fixed upper and lower Begg appliance without extractions, followed by retention. An unexpected complication was the failure of the lower left second molar to erupt; surgical removal of cystic elements surrounding this tooth, followed by traction and, later, mechanics to correct the buccal cross-bite, eventually corrected its position.
format Article
id doaj-art-efd628255a1d409ca83f37f2f723aaa3
institution DOAJ
issn 2207-7480
language English
publishDate 1998-03-01
publisher Sciendo
record_format Article
series Australasian Orthodontic Journal
spelling doaj-art-efd628255a1d409ca83f37f2f723aaa32025-08-20T02:44:03ZengSciendoAustralasian Orthodontic Journal2207-74801998-03-0115211312510.2478/aoj-1998-0006Two-phase treatment of an Angle Class II division 2 malocclusionRapaport Morris01Private Practice, Hon. Clinical Associate Lecturer, University of SydneyThis case report describes a two-phase approach to the treatment of an Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion in a growing boy. The first phase utilised a functional appliance (Clark Twin Blocks) du ring puberty and achieved a pleasing improvement in the facial profile. The second phase involved a fixed upper and lower Begg appliance without extractions, followed by retention. An unexpected complication was the failure of the lower left second molar to erupt; surgical removal of cystic elements surrounding this tooth, followed by traction and, later, mechanics to correct the buccal cross-bite, eventually corrected its position.https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-1998-0006
spellingShingle Rapaport Morris
Two-phase treatment of an Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion
Australasian Orthodontic Journal
title Two-phase treatment of an Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion
title_full Two-phase treatment of an Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion
title_fullStr Two-phase treatment of an Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion
title_full_unstemmed Two-phase treatment of an Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion
title_short Two-phase treatment of an Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion
title_sort two phase treatment of an angle class ii division 2 malocclusion
url https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-1998-0006
work_keys_str_mv AT rapaportmorris twophasetreatmentofanangleclassiidivision2malocclusion