Criteria For Agreement When Conducting Local Consensus Discussions: A Qualitative Study
Lisa Pagano,1 Janet C Long,1 Emilie Francis-Auton,1 Andrew Hirschhorn,2 Jeffrey Braithwaite,1 Gaston Arnolda,1 Mitchell N Sarkies1,3,4 1Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia; 2MQ Health, Faculty of Medicine,...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Dove Medical Press
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Healthcare Leadership |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.dovepress.com/criteria-for-agreement-when-conducting-local-consensus-discussions-a-q-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JHL |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850189935302148096 |
|---|---|
| author | Pagano L Long JC Francis-Auton E Hirschhorn A Braithwaite J Arnolda G Sarkies MN |
| author_facet | Pagano L Long JC Francis-Auton E Hirschhorn A Braithwaite J Arnolda G Sarkies MN |
| author_sort | Pagano L |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Lisa Pagano,1 Janet C Long,1 Emilie Francis-Auton,1 Andrew Hirschhorn,2 Jeffrey Braithwaite,1 Gaston Arnolda,1 Mitchell N Sarkies1,3,4 1Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia; 2MQ Health, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia; 3School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; 4Implementation Science Academy, Sydney Health Partners, University of Sydney, Sydney, AustraliaCorrespondence: Lisa Pagano, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Level 6, 75 Talavera Road, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia, Email lisa.pagano@mq.edu.auPurpose: Healthcare is a complex, multi-layered team environment where effective change often requires reaching consensus among relatively autonomous stakeholders. Although conducting informal consensus discussions is a frequently used implementation strategy in real-world clinical settings, limited information exists about what defines consensus when using these methods. Specifying the criteria for consensus is important, as it can shape the design of consensus-building strategies. This study aimed to identify and define the key domains of consensus used in local consensus discussions to standardise healthcare practices.Patients and Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in one private hospital in Australia using a modified, grounded theory methodology. Clinical, non-clinical and leadership staff involved in developing standardised perioperative pathways using informal consensus discussions were recruited. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews and naturalistic participant observations between February 2023 and May 2024. Data collection and analysis occurred concurrently until theoretical saturation was achieved. Data were analysed using open coding with constant comparison, focussed and theoretical coding to develop theoretical concepts.Results: Sixteen hours of observations with 31 participants and nine semi-structured interviews were conducted. Analysis identified four distinct consensus criteria: i) unanimous consensus, ii) delegated consensus, iii) assumed consensus and iv) concessional consensus. While unanimity was the preferred outcome, other consensus types emerged as viable alternatives when unanimous agreement was challenging to achieve. Each criterion had differing factors and mechanisms which influenced reaching the consensus criterion, underpinning assumptions, and considerations for practice, which formed four domains of consensus.Conclusion: These domains provide a structured framework for classifying consensus criteria when conducting local consensus discussions in healthcare. The findings broaden our understanding of consensus in local healthcare discussions, moving beyond a singular focus on unanimity. By clearly defining consensus types, organisations can strategically select consensus methods that best support decision-making and intervention implementation.Keywords: consensus-building, decision-making, implementation science, qualitative research, healthcare, perioperative pathways |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-efb5448cd249473e85f81a7a7629f5b6 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1179-3201 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-05-01 |
| publisher | Dove Medical Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Healthcare Leadership |
| spelling | doaj-art-efb5448cd249473e85f81a7a7629f5b62025-08-20T02:15:29ZengDove Medical PressJournal of Healthcare Leadership1179-32012025-05-01Volume 17Issue 1159172102656Criteria For Agreement When Conducting Local Consensus Discussions: A Qualitative StudyPagano L0Long JC1Francis-Auton EHirschhorn ABraithwaite JArnolda GSarkies MN2Australian Institute of Health InnovationAustralian Institute of Health InnovationFaculty of Medicine and HealthLisa Pagano,1 Janet C Long,1 Emilie Francis-Auton,1 Andrew Hirschhorn,2 Jeffrey Braithwaite,1 Gaston Arnolda,1 Mitchell N Sarkies1,3,4 1Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia; 2MQ Health, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia; 3School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; 4Implementation Science Academy, Sydney Health Partners, University of Sydney, Sydney, AustraliaCorrespondence: Lisa Pagano, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Level 6, 75 Talavera Road, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia, Email lisa.pagano@mq.edu.auPurpose: Healthcare is a complex, multi-layered team environment where effective change often requires reaching consensus among relatively autonomous stakeholders. Although conducting informal consensus discussions is a frequently used implementation strategy in real-world clinical settings, limited information exists about what defines consensus when using these methods. Specifying the criteria for consensus is important, as it can shape the design of consensus-building strategies. This study aimed to identify and define the key domains of consensus used in local consensus discussions to standardise healthcare practices.Patients and Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in one private hospital in Australia using a modified, grounded theory methodology. Clinical, non-clinical and leadership staff involved in developing standardised perioperative pathways using informal consensus discussions were recruited. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews and naturalistic participant observations between February 2023 and May 2024. Data collection and analysis occurred concurrently until theoretical saturation was achieved. Data were analysed using open coding with constant comparison, focussed and theoretical coding to develop theoretical concepts.Results: Sixteen hours of observations with 31 participants and nine semi-structured interviews were conducted. Analysis identified four distinct consensus criteria: i) unanimous consensus, ii) delegated consensus, iii) assumed consensus and iv) concessional consensus. While unanimity was the preferred outcome, other consensus types emerged as viable alternatives when unanimous agreement was challenging to achieve. Each criterion had differing factors and mechanisms which influenced reaching the consensus criterion, underpinning assumptions, and considerations for practice, which formed four domains of consensus.Conclusion: These domains provide a structured framework for classifying consensus criteria when conducting local consensus discussions in healthcare. The findings broaden our understanding of consensus in local healthcare discussions, moving beyond a singular focus on unanimity. By clearly defining consensus types, organisations can strategically select consensus methods that best support decision-making and intervention implementation.Keywords: consensus-building, decision-making, implementation science, qualitative research, healthcare, perioperative pathwayshttps://www.dovepress.com/criteria-for-agreement-when-conducting-local-consensus-discussions-a-q-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JHLConsensus-buildingDecision-makingImplementation ScienceQualitative ResearchHealthcarePerioperative Pathways |
| spellingShingle | Pagano L Long JC Francis-Auton E Hirschhorn A Braithwaite J Arnolda G Sarkies MN Criteria For Agreement When Conducting Local Consensus Discussions: A Qualitative Study Journal of Healthcare Leadership Consensus-building Decision-making Implementation Science Qualitative Research Healthcare Perioperative Pathways |
| title | Criteria For Agreement When Conducting Local Consensus Discussions: A Qualitative Study |
| title_full | Criteria For Agreement When Conducting Local Consensus Discussions: A Qualitative Study |
| title_fullStr | Criteria For Agreement When Conducting Local Consensus Discussions: A Qualitative Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Criteria For Agreement When Conducting Local Consensus Discussions: A Qualitative Study |
| title_short | Criteria For Agreement When Conducting Local Consensus Discussions: A Qualitative Study |
| title_sort | criteria for agreement when conducting local consensus discussions a qualitative study |
| topic | Consensus-building Decision-making Implementation Science Qualitative Research Healthcare Perioperative Pathways |
| url | https://www.dovepress.com/criteria-for-agreement-when-conducting-local-consensus-discussions-a-q-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JHL |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT paganol criteriaforagreementwhenconductinglocalconsensusdiscussionsaqualitativestudy AT longjc criteriaforagreementwhenconductinglocalconsensusdiscussionsaqualitativestudy AT francisautone criteriaforagreementwhenconductinglocalconsensusdiscussionsaqualitativestudy AT hirschhorna criteriaforagreementwhenconductinglocalconsensusdiscussionsaqualitativestudy AT braithwaitej criteriaforagreementwhenconductinglocalconsensusdiscussionsaqualitativestudy AT arnoldag criteriaforagreementwhenconductinglocalconsensusdiscussionsaqualitativestudy AT sarkiesmn criteriaforagreementwhenconductinglocalconsensusdiscussionsaqualitativestudy |