Application of ASTEC, MELCOR, and MAAP Computer Codes for Thermal Hydraulic Analysis of a PWR Containment Equipped with the PCFV and PAR Systems

The integrity of the containment will be challenged during a severe accident due to pressurization caused by the accumulation of steam and other gases and possible ignition of hydrogen and carbon monoxide. Installation of a passive filtered venting system and passive autocatalytic recombiners allows...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Siniša Šadek, Davor Grgić, Zdenko Šimić
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017-01-01
Series:Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8431934
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849690387475595264
author Siniša Šadek
Davor Grgić
Zdenko Šimić
author_facet Siniša Šadek
Davor Grgić
Zdenko Šimić
author_sort Siniša Šadek
collection DOAJ
description The integrity of the containment will be challenged during a severe accident due to pressurization caused by the accumulation of steam and other gases and possible ignition of hydrogen and carbon monoxide. Installation of a passive filtered venting system and passive autocatalytic recombiners allows control of the pressure, radioactive releases, and concentration of flammable gases. Thermal hydraulic analysis of the containment equipped with dedicated passive safety systems after a hypothetical station blackout event is performed for a two-loop pressurized water reactor NPP with three integral severe accident codes: ASTEC, MELCOR, and MAAP. MELCOR and MAAP are two major US codes for severe accident analyses, and the ASTEC code is the European code, joint property of Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN, France) and Gesellschaft für Anlagen und Reaktorsicherheit (GRS, Germany). Codes’ overall characteristics, physics models, and the analysis results are compared herein. Despite considerable differences between the codes’ modelling features, the general trends of the NPP behaviour are found to be similar, although discrepancies related to simulation of the processes in the containment cavity are also observed and discussed in the paper.
format Article
id doaj-art-efa8bcb8d66a44fdada77f9f89a79a2a
institution DOAJ
issn 1687-6075
1687-6083
language English
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
spelling doaj-art-efa8bcb8d66a44fdada77f9f89a79a2a2025-08-20T03:21:19ZengWileyScience and Technology of Nuclear Installations1687-60751687-60832017-01-01201710.1155/2017/84319348431934Application of ASTEC, MELCOR, and MAAP Computer Codes for Thermal Hydraulic Analysis of a PWR Containment Equipped with the PCFV and PAR SystemsSiniša Šadek0Davor Grgić1Zdenko Šimić2University of Zagreb, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, 10000 Zagreb, CroatiaUniversity of Zagreb, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, 10000 Zagreb, CroatiaEuropean Commission Joint Research Centre, Directorate G – Nuclear Safety and Security, Westerduinweg 3, 1755 LE Petten, NetherlandsThe integrity of the containment will be challenged during a severe accident due to pressurization caused by the accumulation of steam and other gases and possible ignition of hydrogen and carbon monoxide. Installation of a passive filtered venting system and passive autocatalytic recombiners allows control of the pressure, radioactive releases, and concentration of flammable gases. Thermal hydraulic analysis of the containment equipped with dedicated passive safety systems after a hypothetical station blackout event is performed for a two-loop pressurized water reactor NPP with three integral severe accident codes: ASTEC, MELCOR, and MAAP. MELCOR and MAAP are two major US codes for severe accident analyses, and the ASTEC code is the European code, joint property of Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN, France) and Gesellschaft für Anlagen und Reaktorsicherheit (GRS, Germany). Codes’ overall characteristics, physics models, and the analysis results are compared herein. Despite considerable differences between the codes’ modelling features, the general trends of the NPP behaviour are found to be similar, although discrepancies related to simulation of the processes in the containment cavity are also observed and discussed in the paper.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8431934
spellingShingle Siniša Šadek
Davor Grgić
Zdenko Šimić
Application of ASTEC, MELCOR, and MAAP Computer Codes for Thermal Hydraulic Analysis of a PWR Containment Equipped with the PCFV and PAR Systems
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
title Application of ASTEC, MELCOR, and MAAP Computer Codes for Thermal Hydraulic Analysis of a PWR Containment Equipped with the PCFV and PAR Systems
title_full Application of ASTEC, MELCOR, and MAAP Computer Codes for Thermal Hydraulic Analysis of a PWR Containment Equipped with the PCFV and PAR Systems
title_fullStr Application of ASTEC, MELCOR, and MAAP Computer Codes for Thermal Hydraulic Analysis of a PWR Containment Equipped with the PCFV and PAR Systems
title_full_unstemmed Application of ASTEC, MELCOR, and MAAP Computer Codes for Thermal Hydraulic Analysis of a PWR Containment Equipped with the PCFV and PAR Systems
title_short Application of ASTEC, MELCOR, and MAAP Computer Codes for Thermal Hydraulic Analysis of a PWR Containment Equipped with the PCFV and PAR Systems
title_sort application of astec melcor and maap computer codes for thermal hydraulic analysis of a pwr containment equipped with the pcfv and par systems
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8431934
work_keys_str_mv AT sinisasadek applicationofastecmelcorandmaapcomputercodesforthermalhydraulicanalysisofapwrcontainmentequippedwiththepcfvandparsystems
AT davorgrgic applicationofastecmelcorandmaapcomputercodesforthermalhydraulicanalysisofapwrcontainmentequippedwiththepcfvandparsystems
AT zdenkosimic applicationofastecmelcorandmaapcomputercodesforthermalhydraulicanalysisofapwrcontainmentequippedwiththepcfvandparsystems