Why PD-L1 expression varies between studies of lung cancer: results from a Bayesian meta-analysis

Abstract PD-L1 expression is an important biomarker for the management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but has been highly heterogeneous across studies. We developed a statistical model to reconcile conflicting estimates of PD-L1 prevalence by accounting for between-study variation in test sen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Preston Ngo, Wendy A. Cooper, Stephen Wade, Kwun M. Fong, Karen Canfell, Deme Karikios, Marianne Weber
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-02-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80301-9
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823862529628045312
author Preston Ngo
Wendy A. Cooper
Stephen Wade
Kwun M. Fong
Karen Canfell
Deme Karikios
Marianne Weber
author_facet Preston Ngo
Wendy A. Cooper
Stephen Wade
Kwun M. Fong
Karen Canfell
Deme Karikios
Marianne Weber
author_sort Preston Ngo
collection DOAJ
description Abstract PD-L1 expression is an important biomarker for the management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but has been highly heterogeneous across studies. We developed a statistical model to reconcile conflicting estimates of PD-L1 prevalence by accounting for between-study variation in test sensitivity, specimen age, and laboratory count. In doing so, we obtained refined estimates for PD-L1 expression prevalence and identified differences by histological subtype, mutational status, and stage. Across 92 studies published between 2015 and 2023, the detectability of PD-L1 declined with increasing specimen age while the consistency of detection rates was greater for studies incorporating data from a higher number of laboratories. Using the 22C3 antibody as a benchmark, we predicted that 58.3% (95% CrI 49.8–66.1%) and 27.0% (95% CrI 21.2–33.1%) of NSCLC will have PD-L1 tumour proportion scores at the ≥ 1% and ≥ 50% threshold. PD-L1 expression was lower in EGFR-mutated NSCLC and higher in NSCLC with ALK, KRAS, MET, ROS1, and RET alterations. PD-L1 expression was more common with later-stage disease. Overall, this work highlights the continuing challenge of consistency in PD-L1 testing. Although the underlying prevalence of PD-L1 expression varies in the lung cancer population based on tumour-related factors, controllable differences in testing parameters also account for variations in PD-L1 prevalence.
format Article
id doaj-art-ef9754f221bf4653a433ad41db09e4a7
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-ef9754f221bf4653a433ad41db09e4a72025-02-09T12:31:02ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-02-0115111010.1038/s41598-024-80301-9Why PD-L1 expression varies between studies of lung cancer: results from a Bayesian meta-analysisPreston Ngo0Wendy A. Cooper1Stephen Wade2Kwun M. Fong3Karen Canfell4Deme Karikios5Marianne Weber6The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with the Cancer Council NSWDepartment of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, NSW Health Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred HospitalThe Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with the Cancer Council NSWPrince Charles HospitalThe Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with the Cancer Council NSWFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of SydneyThe Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with the Cancer Council NSWAbstract PD-L1 expression is an important biomarker for the management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but has been highly heterogeneous across studies. We developed a statistical model to reconcile conflicting estimates of PD-L1 prevalence by accounting for between-study variation in test sensitivity, specimen age, and laboratory count. In doing so, we obtained refined estimates for PD-L1 expression prevalence and identified differences by histological subtype, mutational status, and stage. Across 92 studies published between 2015 and 2023, the detectability of PD-L1 declined with increasing specimen age while the consistency of detection rates was greater for studies incorporating data from a higher number of laboratories. Using the 22C3 antibody as a benchmark, we predicted that 58.3% (95% CrI 49.8–66.1%) and 27.0% (95% CrI 21.2–33.1%) of NSCLC will have PD-L1 tumour proportion scores at the ≥ 1% and ≥ 50% threshold. PD-L1 expression was lower in EGFR-mutated NSCLC and higher in NSCLC with ALK, KRAS, MET, ROS1, and RET alterations. PD-L1 expression was more common with later-stage disease. Overall, this work highlights the continuing challenge of consistency in PD-L1 testing. Although the underlying prevalence of PD-L1 expression varies in the lung cancer population based on tumour-related factors, controllable differences in testing parameters also account for variations in PD-L1 prevalence.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80301-9PD-L1ImmunohistochemistryImmunotherapyBiomarkersNon-small cell lung cancer
spellingShingle Preston Ngo
Wendy A. Cooper
Stephen Wade
Kwun M. Fong
Karen Canfell
Deme Karikios
Marianne Weber
Why PD-L1 expression varies between studies of lung cancer: results from a Bayesian meta-analysis
Scientific Reports
PD-L1
Immunohistochemistry
Immunotherapy
Biomarkers
Non-small cell lung cancer
title Why PD-L1 expression varies between studies of lung cancer: results from a Bayesian meta-analysis
title_full Why PD-L1 expression varies between studies of lung cancer: results from a Bayesian meta-analysis
title_fullStr Why PD-L1 expression varies between studies of lung cancer: results from a Bayesian meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Why PD-L1 expression varies between studies of lung cancer: results from a Bayesian meta-analysis
title_short Why PD-L1 expression varies between studies of lung cancer: results from a Bayesian meta-analysis
title_sort why pd l1 expression varies between studies of lung cancer results from a bayesian meta analysis
topic PD-L1
Immunohistochemistry
Immunotherapy
Biomarkers
Non-small cell lung cancer
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80301-9
work_keys_str_mv AT prestonngo whypdl1expressionvariesbetweenstudiesoflungcancerresultsfromabayesianmetaanalysis
AT wendyacooper whypdl1expressionvariesbetweenstudiesoflungcancerresultsfromabayesianmetaanalysis
AT stephenwade whypdl1expressionvariesbetweenstudiesoflungcancerresultsfromabayesianmetaanalysis
AT kwunmfong whypdl1expressionvariesbetweenstudiesoflungcancerresultsfromabayesianmetaanalysis
AT karencanfell whypdl1expressionvariesbetweenstudiesoflungcancerresultsfromabayesianmetaanalysis
AT demekarikios whypdl1expressionvariesbetweenstudiesoflungcancerresultsfromabayesianmetaanalysis
AT marianneweber whypdl1expressionvariesbetweenstudiesoflungcancerresultsfromabayesianmetaanalysis