Systematic evaluation of the patient-reported outcome (PRO) content of clinical trial protocols.
<h4>Background</h4>Qualitative evidence suggests patient-reported outcome (PRO) information is frequently absent from clinical trial protocols, potentially leading to inconsistent PRO data collection and risking bias. Direct evidence regarding PRO trial protocol content is lacking. The a...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Derek Kyte, Helen Duffy, Benjamin Fletcher, Adrian Gheorghe, Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber, Madeleine King, Heather Draper, Jonathan Ives, Michael Brundage, Jane Blazeby, Melanie Calvert |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110229 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment in clinical trials: a systematic review of guidance for trial protocol writers.
by: Melanie Calvert, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Patient reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical trials: is 'in-trial' guidance lacking? a systematic review.
by: Derek G Kyte, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
Centre selection for clinical trials and the generalisability of results: a mixed methods study.
by: Adrian Gheorghe, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in adult patients with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review.
by: Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
A systematic review of the patient reported outcomes that affect patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer after radical cystectomy and urinary diversion
by: John Lahoud, et al.
Published: (2024-06-01)