Testing self-supportive strategies to regulate autonomy and motivation.

People regularly encounter situations in which they have to engage in tasks they find boring or irrelevant, in which case their autonomy-the need to act in ways that are meaningful for oneself-is impeded. When there is no motivational support available, individuals need to find ways to overcome thei...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barbara Flunger, Lau Lilleholt, Robert Böhm, Anouk Verdonschot, Tamara van Gog, Ingo Zettler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2024-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311264
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850180155431976960
author Barbara Flunger
Lau Lilleholt
Robert Böhm
Anouk Verdonschot
Tamara van Gog
Ingo Zettler
author_facet Barbara Flunger
Lau Lilleholt
Robert Böhm
Anouk Verdonschot
Tamara van Gog
Ingo Zettler
author_sort Barbara Flunger
collection DOAJ
description People regularly encounter situations in which they have to engage in tasks they find boring or irrelevant, in which case their autonomy-the need to act in ways that are meaningful for oneself-is impeded. When there is no motivational support available, individuals need to find ways to overcome their motivational barriers by themselves. Applying autonomy-regulation strategies may be effective for increasing autonomy and particularly the more adaptive types of motivation (i.e., intrinsic and internalized). Testing this idea, we investigated whether individuals apply self-supportive strategies to boost their feelings of autonomy and motivation in two studies via cross-sectional survey samples (overall N = 2,344). We analyzed how autonomy regulation strategies were associated with theoretically related variables via Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). In Study 1, the self-reported use of autonomy regulation strategies was strongly positively associated with intrinsic and internalized types of motivation, weakly positively correlated with introjected avoidance motivation, and not associated with external motivation. In Study 2, we introduced two dilemmas concerning motivational problems individuals face when engaging in tasks and being assigned a task, respectively. Results indicate that individuals report using general strategies of autonomy regulation to achieve fulfillment of autonomy and intrinsic motivation, next to more specific autonomy regulation strategies regarding specific dilemmas. Our results show that it would be worthwhile to investigate if stimulating individuals to use autonomy regulation strategies would positively affect their motivation (e.g., in job or study contexts), and that in doing so, it is important to consider both specific context effects on autonomy regulation as well as individual preferences for general strategies used to regulate one's autonomy.
format Article
id doaj-art-ef497a0392004b81ab80b5cc1d0598f5
institution OA Journals
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-ef497a0392004b81ab80b5cc1d0598f52025-08-20T02:18:16ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032024-01-011910e031126410.1371/journal.pone.0311264Testing self-supportive strategies to regulate autonomy and motivation.Barbara FlungerLau LilleholtRobert BöhmAnouk VerdonschotTamara van GogIngo ZettlerPeople regularly encounter situations in which they have to engage in tasks they find boring or irrelevant, in which case their autonomy-the need to act in ways that are meaningful for oneself-is impeded. When there is no motivational support available, individuals need to find ways to overcome their motivational barriers by themselves. Applying autonomy-regulation strategies may be effective for increasing autonomy and particularly the more adaptive types of motivation (i.e., intrinsic and internalized). Testing this idea, we investigated whether individuals apply self-supportive strategies to boost their feelings of autonomy and motivation in two studies via cross-sectional survey samples (overall N = 2,344). We analyzed how autonomy regulation strategies were associated with theoretically related variables via Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). In Study 1, the self-reported use of autonomy regulation strategies was strongly positively associated with intrinsic and internalized types of motivation, weakly positively correlated with introjected avoidance motivation, and not associated with external motivation. In Study 2, we introduced two dilemmas concerning motivational problems individuals face when engaging in tasks and being assigned a task, respectively. Results indicate that individuals report using general strategies of autonomy regulation to achieve fulfillment of autonomy and intrinsic motivation, next to more specific autonomy regulation strategies regarding specific dilemmas. Our results show that it would be worthwhile to investigate if stimulating individuals to use autonomy regulation strategies would positively affect their motivation (e.g., in job or study contexts), and that in doing so, it is important to consider both specific context effects on autonomy regulation as well as individual preferences for general strategies used to regulate one's autonomy.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311264
spellingShingle Barbara Flunger
Lau Lilleholt
Robert Böhm
Anouk Verdonschot
Tamara van Gog
Ingo Zettler
Testing self-supportive strategies to regulate autonomy and motivation.
PLoS ONE
title Testing self-supportive strategies to regulate autonomy and motivation.
title_full Testing self-supportive strategies to regulate autonomy and motivation.
title_fullStr Testing self-supportive strategies to regulate autonomy and motivation.
title_full_unstemmed Testing self-supportive strategies to regulate autonomy and motivation.
title_short Testing self-supportive strategies to regulate autonomy and motivation.
title_sort testing self supportive strategies to regulate autonomy and motivation
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311264
work_keys_str_mv AT barbaraflunger testingselfsupportivestrategiestoregulateautonomyandmotivation
AT laulilleholt testingselfsupportivestrategiestoregulateautonomyandmotivation
AT robertbohm testingselfsupportivestrategiestoregulateautonomyandmotivation
AT anoukverdonschot testingselfsupportivestrategiestoregulateautonomyandmotivation
AT tamaravangog testingselfsupportivestrategiestoregulateautonomyandmotivation
AT ingozettler testingselfsupportivestrategiestoregulateautonomyandmotivation