The Impact of Delivery Methods on the Delivery Outcomes of Women with a Prolonged Second Stage and a Fetus in the Occipital Posterior Position
Background: The objective was to explore the impact of different delivery methods on maternal and infant outcomes in women with a prolonged second stage of labor and a fetus with a persistent occipital posterior position. Methods: 60 women with a fetus in the occipital posterior position who underwe...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
IMR Press
2024-04-01
|
| Series: | Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.imrpress.com/journal/CEOG/51/4/10.31083/j.ceog5104097 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849690832484958208 |
|---|---|
| author | Jun Zhou Shengyan Mao Zhaoping Zheng Chunxia Lin Jia Tang Jie Lin Jie Ling Lixi Yang Zijuan Jiang Dandan Wu |
| author_facet | Jun Zhou Shengyan Mao Zhaoping Zheng Chunxia Lin Jia Tang Jie Lin Jie Ling Lixi Yang Zijuan Jiang Dandan Wu |
| author_sort | Jun Zhou |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: The objective was to explore the impact of different delivery methods on maternal and infant outcomes in women with a prolonged second stage of labor and a fetus with a persistent occipital posterior position. Methods: 60 women with a fetus in the occipital posterior position who underwent obstetric low forceps-assisted delivery were selected as the study group according to the order of delivery, and 40 women who underwent cesarean section during the same period were selected as study group 1 according to the order of delivery. We compared the maternal-related indicators and neonatal outcome-related indicators of the two groups. Then, we selected women in chronological order during the same period to be included in control group 2 (60 primiparous women with a fetus in the occipital anterior position who underwent low forceps-assisted delivery during the same period) for comparison with the study group. Results: The time of fetal head delivery, postpartum hemorrhage rate, hospitalization time, average hospitalization cost, and number of cases of postpartum infection in the group with a fetus in the occipital posterior position and low forceps-assisted delivery were significantly lower than those in the cesarean section group (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the 1-minute Apgar score, umbilical artery blood gas pH value, or number of neonatal injuries between the cesarean section group and the group with a fetus in the occipital posterior position with forceps-assisted delivery (p > 0.05). There were also no statistically significant differences in the complication-related indicators between the group with a fetus in the occipital posterior position with forceps-assisted delivery and the group with a fetus in the occipital anterior position with forceps-assisted delivery. The two groups had second-degree lacerations, cervical lacerations, vaginal wall lacerations, and vaginal wall hematomas. There was no statistically significant difference in the comparison of urinary retention (p > 0.05), and there was no statistically significant difference between the group with a fetus in the occipital posterior position and forceps-assisted delivery and the group with a fetus in the occipital anterior position and forceps-assisted delivery in the comparison of related indicators of neonatal outcomes and pelvic floor reexamination at the Aa and Ap points 42 days after delivery (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The use of low forceps for women with a prolonged second stage of labor and a fetus in a persistent occipital posterior position can effectively shorten the time of fetal head delivery, reduce postpartum bleeding, reduce the incidence of postpartum infection, shorten the hospitalization time, and reduce average hospitalization costs and does not increase adverse neonatal outcomes. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-ef3eb91e322947acaa22b7536edce6e7 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 0390-6663 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-04-01 |
| publisher | IMR Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology |
| spelling | doaj-art-ef3eb91e322947acaa22b7536edce6e72025-08-20T03:21:12ZengIMR PressClinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology0390-66632024-04-015149710.31083/j.ceog5104097S0390-6663(24)02325-XThe Impact of Delivery Methods on the Delivery Outcomes of Women with a Prolonged Second Stage and a Fetus in the Occipital Posterior PositionJun Zhou0Shengyan Mao1Zhaoping Zheng2Chunxia Lin3Jia Tang4Jie Lin5Jie Ling6Lixi Yang7Zijuan Jiang8Dandan Wu9Department of Obstetrics, The First People's Hospital of Longquanyi, 610100 Chengdu, Sichuan, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics, The First People's Hospital of Longquanyi, 610100 Chengdu, Sichuan, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics, The First People's Hospital of Longquanyi, 610100 Chengdu, Sichuan, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics, The First People's Hospital of Longquanyi, 610100 Chengdu, Sichuan, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics, The First People's Hospital of Longquanyi, 610100 Chengdu, Sichuan, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics, The First People's Hospital of Longquanyi, 610100 Chengdu, Sichuan, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics, The First People's Hospital of Longquanyi, 610100 Chengdu, Sichuan, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics, The First People's Hospital of Longquanyi, 610100 Chengdu, Sichuan, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics, The First People's Hospital of Longquanyi, 610100 Chengdu, Sichuan, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics, The First People's Hospital of Longquanyi, 610100 Chengdu, Sichuan, ChinaBackground: The objective was to explore the impact of different delivery methods on maternal and infant outcomes in women with a prolonged second stage of labor and a fetus with a persistent occipital posterior position. Methods: 60 women with a fetus in the occipital posterior position who underwent obstetric low forceps-assisted delivery were selected as the study group according to the order of delivery, and 40 women who underwent cesarean section during the same period were selected as study group 1 according to the order of delivery. We compared the maternal-related indicators and neonatal outcome-related indicators of the two groups. Then, we selected women in chronological order during the same period to be included in control group 2 (60 primiparous women with a fetus in the occipital anterior position who underwent low forceps-assisted delivery during the same period) for comparison with the study group. Results: The time of fetal head delivery, postpartum hemorrhage rate, hospitalization time, average hospitalization cost, and number of cases of postpartum infection in the group with a fetus in the occipital posterior position and low forceps-assisted delivery were significantly lower than those in the cesarean section group (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the 1-minute Apgar score, umbilical artery blood gas pH value, or number of neonatal injuries between the cesarean section group and the group with a fetus in the occipital posterior position with forceps-assisted delivery (p > 0.05). There were also no statistically significant differences in the complication-related indicators between the group with a fetus in the occipital posterior position with forceps-assisted delivery and the group with a fetus in the occipital anterior position with forceps-assisted delivery. The two groups had second-degree lacerations, cervical lacerations, vaginal wall lacerations, and vaginal wall hematomas. There was no statistically significant difference in the comparison of urinary retention (p > 0.05), and there was no statistically significant difference between the group with a fetus in the occipital posterior position and forceps-assisted delivery and the group with a fetus in the occipital anterior position and forceps-assisted delivery in the comparison of related indicators of neonatal outcomes and pelvic floor reexamination at the Aa and Ap points 42 days after delivery (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The use of low forceps for women with a prolonged second stage of labor and a fetus in a persistent occipital posterior position can effectively shorten the time of fetal head delivery, reduce postpartum bleeding, reduce the incidence of postpartum infection, shorten the hospitalization time, and reduce average hospitalization costs and does not increase adverse neonatal outcomes.https://www.imrpress.com/journal/CEOG/51/4/10.31083/j.ceog5104097prolonged second stage of laboroccipital posterior positionlow forcepscesarean sectionmaternal and infant outcomes |
| spellingShingle | Jun Zhou Shengyan Mao Zhaoping Zheng Chunxia Lin Jia Tang Jie Lin Jie Ling Lixi Yang Zijuan Jiang Dandan Wu The Impact of Delivery Methods on the Delivery Outcomes of Women with a Prolonged Second Stage and a Fetus in the Occipital Posterior Position Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology prolonged second stage of labor occipital posterior position low forceps cesarean section maternal and infant outcomes |
| title | The Impact of Delivery Methods on the Delivery Outcomes of Women with a Prolonged Second Stage and a Fetus in the Occipital Posterior Position |
| title_full | The Impact of Delivery Methods on the Delivery Outcomes of Women with a Prolonged Second Stage and a Fetus in the Occipital Posterior Position |
| title_fullStr | The Impact of Delivery Methods on the Delivery Outcomes of Women with a Prolonged Second Stage and a Fetus in the Occipital Posterior Position |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of Delivery Methods on the Delivery Outcomes of Women with a Prolonged Second Stage and a Fetus in the Occipital Posterior Position |
| title_short | The Impact of Delivery Methods on the Delivery Outcomes of Women with a Prolonged Second Stage and a Fetus in the Occipital Posterior Position |
| title_sort | impact of delivery methods on the delivery outcomes of women with a prolonged second stage and a fetus in the occipital posterior position |
| topic | prolonged second stage of labor occipital posterior position low forceps cesarean section maternal and infant outcomes |
| url | https://www.imrpress.com/journal/CEOG/51/4/10.31083/j.ceog5104097 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT junzhou theimpactofdeliverymethodsonthedeliveryoutcomesofwomenwithaprolongedsecondstageandafetusintheoccipitalposteriorposition AT shengyanmao theimpactofdeliverymethodsonthedeliveryoutcomesofwomenwithaprolongedsecondstageandafetusintheoccipitalposteriorposition AT zhaopingzheng theimpactofdeliverymethodsonthedeliveryoutcomesofwomenwithaprolongedsecondstageandafetusintheoccipitalposteriorposition AT chunxialin theimpactofdeliverymethodsonthedeliveryoutcomesofwomenwithaprolongedsecondstageandafetusintheoccipitalposteriorposition AT jiatang theimpactofdeliverymethodsonthedeliveryoutcomesofwomenwithaprolongedsecondstageandafetusintheoccipitalposteriorposition AT jielin theimpactofdeliverymethodsonthedeliveryoutcomesofwomenwithaprolongedsecondstageandafetusintheoccipitalposteriorposition AT jieling theimpactofdeliverymethodsonthedeliveryoutcomesofwomenwithaprolongedsecondstageandafetusintheoccipitalposteriorposition AT lixiyang theimpactofdeliverymethodsonthedeliveryoutcomesofwomenwithaprolongedsecondstageandafetusintheoccipitalposteriorposition AT zijuanjiang theimpactofdeliverymethodsonthedeliveryoutcomesofwomenwithaprolongedsecondstageandafetusintheoccipitalposteriorposition AT dandanwu theimpactofdeliverymethodsonthedeliveryoutcomesofwomenwithaprolongedsecondstageandafetusintheoccipitalposteriorposition AT junzhou impactofdeliverymethodsonthedeliveryoutcomesofwomenwithaprolongedsecondstageandafetusintheoccipitalposteriorposition AT shengyanmao impactofdeliverymethodsonthedeliveryoutcomesofwomenwithaprolongedsecondstageandafetusintheoccipitalposteriorposition AT zhaopingzheng impactofdeliverymethodsonthedeliveryoutcomesofwomenwithaprolongedsecondstageandafetusintheoccipitalposteriorposition AT chunxialin impactofdeliverymethodsonthedeliveryoutcomesofwomenwithaprolongedsecondstageandafetusintheoccipitalposteriorposition AT jiatang impactofdeliverymethodsonthedeliveryoutcomesofwomenwithaprolongedsecondstageandafetusintheoccipitalposteriorposition AT jielin impactofdeliverymethodsonthedeliveryoutcomesofwomenwithaprolongedsecondstageandafetusintheoccipitalposteriorposition AT jieling impactofdeliverymethodsonthedeliveryoutcomesofwomenwithaprolongedsecondstageandafetusintheoccipitalposteriorposition AT lixiyang impactofdeliverymethodsonthedeliveryoutcomesofwomenwithaprolongedsecondstageandafetusintheoccipitalposteriorposition AT zijuanjiang impactofdeliverymethodsonthedeliveryoutcomesofwomenwithaprolongedsecondstageandafetusintheoccipitalposteriorposition AT dandanwu impactofdeliverymethodsonthedeliveryoutcomesofwomenwithaprolongedsecondstageandafetusintheoccipitalposteriorposition |