A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Class V Composite Restorations
Aim. To compare and evaluate the microleakage in class V lesions restored with composite resin with and without liner and injectable nanohybrid composite resin. Materials and Methodology. 60 class V cavities were prepared in 30 freshly extracted teeth. After etching and application of bonding agents...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2014-01-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Dentistry |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/685643 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832561946972389376 |
|---|---|
| author | Sujatha Gopal Sooraparaju Pavan Kumar Kanumuru Surya Kumari Nujella Karthik Roy Konda K. Bala Kasi Reddy Sivaram Penigalapati |
| author_facet | Sujatha Gopal Sooraparaju Pavan Kumar Kanumuru Surya Kumari Nujella Karthik Roy Konda K. Bala Kasi Reddy Sivaram Penigalapati |
| author_sort | Sujatha Gopal Sooraparaju |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Aim. To compare and evaluate the microleakage in class V lesions restored with composite resin with and without liner and injectable nanohybrid composite resin. Materials and Methodology. 60 class V cavities were prepared in 30 freshly extracted teeth. After etching and application of bonding agents these cavities were divided into three groups: Group A (n=20)—restored with composite resin, Group B (n=20)—flowable composite resin liner + composite resin, and Group C (n=20)—restored with injectable composite resin. After curing all the specimens were subjected to thermocycling and cyclic loading. Specimens were stained with 0.5% basic fuchsin and evaluated for dye penetration. Results. Results are subjected to Kruskal Wallis and Wilcoxon test. Conclusion. Within the limitations of this study, none of the three materials were free from microleakage. All the three materials showed more microleakage at gingival margins compared to occlusal margins. Among all the groups G-ænial Flo showed the least microleakage at the gingival wall. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-eef53ca646a547f6b12cd985c2c30b1b |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1687-8728 1687-8736 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2014-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal of Dentistry |
| spelling | doaj-art-eef53ca646a547f6b12cd985c2c30b1b2025-02-03T01:23:52ZengWileyInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87281687-87362014-01-01201410.1155/2014/685643685643A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Class V Composite RestorationsSujatha Gopal Sooraparaju0Pavan Kumar Kanumuru1Surya Kumari Nujella2Karthik Roy Konda3K. Bala Kasi Reddy4Sivaram Penigalapati5Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, MNR Dental College and Hospital, Telangana, IndiaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, MNR Dental College and Hospital, Telangana, IndiaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, MNR Dental College and Hospital, Telangana, IndiaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, MNR Dental College and Hospital, Telangana, IndiaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, MNR Dental College and Hospital, Telangana, IndiaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, MNR Dental College and Hospital, Telangana, IndiaAim. To compare and evaluate the microleakage in class V lesions restored with composite resin with and without liner and injectable nanohybrid composite resin. Materials and Methodology. 60 class V cavities were prepared in 30 freshly extracted teeth. After etching and application of bonding agents these cavities were divided into three groups: Group A (n=20)—restored with composite resin, Group B (n=20)—flowable composite resin liner + composite resin, and Group C (n=20)—restored with injectable composite resin. After curing all the specimens were subjected to thermocycling and cyclic loading. Specimens were stained with 0.5% basic fuchsin and evaluated for dye penetration. Results. Results are subjected to Kruskal Wallis and Wilcoxon test. Conclusion. Within the limitations of this study, none of the three materials were free from microleakage. All the three materials showed more microleakage at gingival margins compared to occlusal margins. Among all the groups G-ænial Flo showed the least microleakage at the gingival wall.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/685643 |
| spellingShingle | Sujatha Gopal Sooraparaju Pavan Kumar Kanumuru Surya Kumari Nujella Karthik Roy Konda K. Bala Kasi Reddy Sivaram Penigalapati A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Class V Composite Restorations International Journal of Dentistry |
| title | A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Class V Composite Restorations |
| title_full | A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Class V Composite Restorations |
| title_fullStr | A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Class V Composite Restorations |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Class V Composite Restorations |
| title_short | A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Class V Composite Restorations |
| title_sort | comparative evaluation of microleakage in class v composite restorations |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/685643 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sujathagopalsooraparaju acomparativeevaluationofmicroleakageinclassvcompositerestorations AT pavankumarkanumuru acomparativeevaluationofmicroleakageinclassvcompositerestorations AT suryakumarinujella acomparativeevaluationofmicroleakageinclassvcompositerestorations AT karthikroykonda acomparativeevaluationofmicroleakageinclassvcompositerestorations AT kbalakasireddy acomparativeevaluationofmicroleakageinclassvcompositerestorations AT sivarampenigalapati acomparativeevaluationofmicroleakageinclassvcompositerestorations AT sujathagopalsooraparaju comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageinclassvcompositerestorations AT pavankumarkanumuru comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageinclassvcompositerestorations AT suryakumarinujella comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageinclassvcompositerestorations AT karthikroykonda comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageinclassvcompositerestorations AT kbalakasireddy comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageinclassvcompositerestorations AT sivarampenigalapati comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageinclassvcompositerestorations |