Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills in ChatGPT-Human Interaction: A Scoping Review
Introduction: The rapid integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) technologies, including ChatGPT, into educational environments has introduced both opportunities and challenges for learners and educators. While GenAI can support advanced learning practices, it also raises concerns...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
National Research University Higher School of Economics
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Language and Education |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://jle.hse.ru/article/view/27387 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849320902481674240 |
|---|---|
| author | Lilia Raitskaya Elena Tikhonova |
| author_facet | Lilia Raitskaya Elena Tikhonova |
| author_sort | Lilia Raitskaya |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Introduction: The rapid integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) technologies, including ChatGPT, into educational environments has introduced both opportunities and challenges for learners and educators. While GenAI can support advanced learning practices, it also raises concerns about critical engagement and the accuracy of generated content. Previous systematic reviews have explored GenAI’s relationship with critical thinking (CT) and self-regulated learning, but a focused synthesis of recent empirical evidence on GenAI’s impact on university students’ CT skills remains lacking.
Method: This scoping review followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and applied the Arksey and O’Malley framework alongside the Population – Concept – Context (PCC) model. Studies were identified via the Scopus database, using inclusion criteria limited to the years 2024–2025, English language, and the Social Sciences subject area. Thirty eligible empirical studies were analysed and visualised using VOSviewer to identify thematic clusters and categories in the literature.
Results: The reviewed studies were grouped into seventeen thematic clusters by the VOSviewer and then manually synthesized into six categories based on semantic interpretation: cognitive and metacognitive development, pedagogical innovation and learning design, academic writing and language learning, AI literacy and learner perception, evaluation and assessment technologies, global and ethical dimensions of GenAI use. The findings were analysed as (1) direct enhancement of CT, (2) metacognitive and reflective gains, (3) contextual factors shaping CT, (4) risks of cognitive offloading, and (5) instructional strategies mediating AI’s effect. 21 publications showed predominantly positive impact of GenAI on CT (idea generation, conceptual understanding, construction of arguments, literature review, academic writing, etc.) whereas reported found mixed impact.
Conclusion: The review concludes that GenAI holds substantial potential to support CT development, particularly when pedagogically integrated to promote active reasoning, metacognitive monitoring, and critical autonomy. However, the evidence base is still emerging and is limited by its short temporal scope, narrow database coverage, and reliance on self-reported data. Future research should focus on long-term effects, discipline-specific instructional models, and robust theoretical frameworks linking AI use to cognitive outcomes.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-eef2496d37314c329a95c68de8068a01 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2411-7390 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-06-01 |
| publisher | National Research University Higher School of Economics |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Language and Education |
| spelling | doaj-art-eef2496d37314c329a95c68de8068a012025-08-20T03:49:55ZengNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsJournal of Language and Education2411-73902025-06-0111210.17323/jle.2025.27387Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills in ChatGPT-Human Interaction: A Scoping ReviewLilia Raitskaya0Elena Tikhonova1MGIMO University, Moscow, RussiaHSE University, Moscow, Russia; RUDN University, Moscow, Russia Introduction: The rapid integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) technologies, including ChatGPT, into educational environments has introduced both opportunities and challenges for learners and educators. While GenAI can support advanced learning practices, it also raises concerns about critical engagement and the accuracy of generated content. Previous systematic reviews have explored GenAI’s relationship with critical thinking (CT) and self-regulated learning, but a focused synthesis of recent empirical evidence on GenAI’s impact on university students’ CT skills remains lacking. Method: This scoping review followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and applied the Arksey and O’Malley framework alongside the Population – Concept – Context (PCC) model. Studies were identified via the Scopus database, using inclusion criteria limited to the years 2024–2025, English language, and the Social Sciences subject area. Thirty eligible empirical studies were analysed and visualised using VOSviewer to identify thematic clusters and categories in the literature. Results: The reviewed studies were grouped into seventeen thematic clusters by the VOSviewer and then manually synthesized into six categories based on semantic interpretation: cognitive and metacognitive development, pedagogical innovation and learning design, academic writing and language learning, AI literacy and learner perception, evaluation and assessment technologies, global and ethical dimensions of GenAI use. The findings were analysed as (1) direct enhancement of CT, (2) metacognitive and reflective gains, (3) contextual factors shaping CT, (4) risks of cognitive offloading, and (5) instructional strategies mediating AI’s effect. 21 publications showed predominantly positive impact of GenAI on CT (idea generation, conceptual understanding, construction of arguments, literature review, academic writing, etc.) whereas reported found mixed impact. Conclusion: The review concludes that GenAI holds substantial potential to support CT development, particularly when pedagogically integrated to promote active reasoning, metacognitive monitoring, and critical autonomy. However, the evidence base is still emerging and is limited by its short temporal scope, narrow database coverage, and reliance on self-reported data. Future research should focus on long-term effects, discipline-specific instructional models, and robust theoretical frameworks linking AI use to cognitive outcomes. https://jle.hse.ru/article/view/27387development of critical thinking skills; generative AI impact on higher education; ChatGPT and student cognition; AI-supported academic writing; metacognitive engagement with GenAI; GenAI and argumentation; prompt engineering and critical thinking |
| spellingShingle | Lilia Raitskaya Elena Tikhonova Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills in ChatGPT-Human Interaction: A Scoping Review Journal of Language and Education development of critical thinking skills; generative AI impact on higher education; ChatGPT and student cognition; AI-supported academic writing; metacognitive engagement with GenAI; GenAI and argumentation; prompt engineering and critical thinking |
| title | Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills in ChatGPT-Human Interaction: A Scoping Review |
| title_full | Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills in ChatGPT-Human Interaction: A Scoping Review |
| title_fullStr | Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills in ChatGPT-Human Interaction: A Scoping Review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills in ChatGPT-Human Interaction: A Scoping Review |
| title_short | Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills in ChatGPT-Human Interaction: A Scoping Review |
| title_sort | enhancing critical thinking skills in chatgpt human interaction a scoping review |
| topic | development of critical thinking skills; generative AI impact on higher education; ChatGPT and student cognition; AI-supported academic writing; metacognitive engagement with GenAI; GenAI and argumentation; prompt engineering and critical thinking |
| url | https://jle.hse.ru/article/view/27387 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT liliaraitskaya enhancingcriticalthinkingskillsinchatgpthumaninteractionascopingreview AT elenatikhonova enhancingcriticalthinkingskillsinchatgpthumaninteractionascopingreview |