A Study on Interpretable Electric Load Forecasting Model with Spatiotemporal Feature Fusion Based on Attention Mechanism
Driven by the global “double carbon” goal, the volatility of renewable energy poses a challenge to the stability of power systems. Traditional methods have difficulty dealing with high-dimensional nonlinear data, and the single deep learning model has the limitations of spatiotemporal feature decoup...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Technologies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7080/13/6/219 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Driven by the global “double carbon” goal, the volatility of renewable energy poses a challenge to the stability of power systems. Traditional methods have difficulty dealing with high-dimensional nonlinear data, and the single deep learning model has the limitations of spatiotemporal feature decoupling and being a “black box”. Aiming at the problem of insufficient accuracy and interpretability of power load forecasting in a renewable energy grid connected scenario, this study proposes an interpretable spatiotemporal feature fusion model based on an attention mechanism. Through CNN layered extraction of multi-dimensional space–time features such as meteorology and electricity price, BiLSTM bi-directional modeling time series rely on capturing the evolution rules of load series before and after, and the improved self-attention mechanism dynamically focuses on key features. Combined with the SHAP quantitative feature contribution and feature deletion experiment, a complete chain of “feature extraction time series modeling weight allocation interpretation and verification” is constructed. The experimental results show that the determination coefficient R<sup>2</sup> of the model on the Australian electricity market data set reaches 0.9935, which is 84.6% and 59.8% higher than that of the LSTM and GRU models, respectively. The prediction error (RMSE = 105.5079) is 9.7% lower than that of TCN-LSTM model and 52.1% compared to the GNN (220.6049). Cross scenario validation shows that the generalization performance is excellent (R<sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.9849). The interpretability analysis reveals that electricity price (average absolute value of SHAP 716.7761) is the core influencing factor, and its lack leads to a 0.76% decline in R<sup>2</sup>. The research breaks through the limitation of time–space decoupling and the unexplainable bottleneck of traditional models, provides a transparent basis for power dispatching, and has an important reference value for the construction of new power systems. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2227-7080 |