Optimization and Benefit Assessment of LID Layout Based on the MCDA Approach at a Campus Scale

Low-impact development (LID) offers environmental, economic, and social benefits, yet research on optimizing facility combinations remains limited. This study evaluates four representative LID types—green roofs, sunken green spaces, permeable pavement, and rain gardens—using an integrated framework...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zexin Lei, Lijun Li, Yanrou Wei, Wenzheng Zhang, Junjie Luo, Xuqiang Zhao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-07-01
Series:Land
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1434
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850077389428621312
author Zexin Lei
Lijun Li
Yanrou Wei
Wenzheng Zhang
Junjie Luo
Xuqiang Zhao
author_facet Zexin Lei
Lijun Li
Yanrou Wei
Wenzheng Zhang
Junjie Luo
Xuqiang Zhao
author_sort Zexin Lei
collection DOAJ
description Low-impact development (LID) offers environmental, economic, and social benefits, yet research on optimizing facility combinations remains limited. This study evaluates four representative LID types—green roofs, sunken green spaces, permeable pavement, and rain gardens—using an integrated framework combining the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM), NSGA-II genetic algorithm, and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) at Taiyuan University of Technology in Shanxi Province, China. Based on site constraints, each LID type was pre-assigned to suitable subareas, and optimization focused on determining proportional allocations within these areas. SWMM simulations revealed that permeable paving achieved the highest runoff reduction (up to 19.4% at 65% coverage) and strong cost-effectiveness (0.013 USD per % reduction). NSGA-II was used to generate a set of optimal solutions by minimizing construction costs and maximizing runoff and pollutant reductions. AHP then ranked these solutions according to their environmental, economic, and social benefits. In this case, the ideal mix—subject to site-specific constraints and model assumptions—includes 28.58% green roofs, 19.37% sunken green spaces, 48.68% permeable paving, and 3.37% rain gardens. The study proposes a sponge campus renewal strategy, offering theoretical and practical insights for sustainable urban development and precise environmental management.
format Article
id doaj-art-eec03ce7643c42cb989f4c80cc24656f
institution DOAJ
issn 2073-445X
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Land
spelling doaj-art-eec03ce7643c42cb989f4c80cc24656f2025-08-20T02:45:49ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2025-07-01147143410.3390/land14071434Optimization and Benefit Assessment of LID Layout Based on the MCDA Approach at a Campus ScaleZexin Lei0Lijun Li1Yanrou Wei2Wenzheng Zhang3Junjie Luo4Xuqiang Zhao5College of Architecture and Art, Taiyuan University of Technology, No. 79 West Street Yingze, Taiyuan 030024, ChinaCollege of Architecture and Art, Taiyuan University of Technology, No. 79 West Street Yingze, Taiyuan 030024, ChinaCollege of Architecture and Art, Taiyuan University of Technology, No. 79 West Street Yingze, Taiyuan 030024, ChinaSchool of Architecture, Tianjin University, No. 92, Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300072, ChinaCollege of Landscape Architecture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, ChinaShanxi Academy of Social Sciences, No. 14, South Road Dachang, Taiyuan 030032, ChinaLow-impact development (LID) offers environmental, economic, and social benefits, yet research on optimizing facility combinations remains limited. This study evaluates four representative LID types—green roofs, sunken green spaces, permeable pavement, and rain gardens—using an integrated framework combining the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM), NSGA-II genetic algorithm, and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) at Taiyuan University of Technology in Shanxi Province, China. Based on site constraints, each LID type was pre-assigned to suitable subareas, and optimization focused on determining proportional allocations within these areas. SWMM simulations revealed that permeable paving achieved the highest runoff reduction (up to 19.4% at 65% coverage) and strong cost-effectiveness (0.013 USD per % reduction). NSGA-II was used to generate a set of optimal solutions by minimizing construction costs and maximizing runoff and pollutant reductions. AHP then ranked these solutions according to their environmental, economic, and social benefits. In this case, the ideal mix—subject to site-specific constraints and model assumptions—includes 28.58% green roofs, 19.37% sunken green spaces, 48.68% permeable paving, and 3.37% rain gardens. The study proposes a sponge campus renewal strategy, offering theoretical and practical insights for sustainable urban development and precise environmental management.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1434stormwater managementLID layoutSWMMNSGA-IIAnalytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)Sustainable Cities and Communities (SDG)
spellingShingle Zexin Lei
Lijun Li
Yanrou Wei
Wenzheng Zhang
Junjie Luo
Xuqiang Zhao
Optimization and Benefit Assessment of LID Layout Based on the MCDA Approach at a Campus Scale
Land
stormwater management
LID layout
SWMM
NSGA-II
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
Sustainable Cities and Communities (SDG)
title Optimization and Benefit Assessment of LID Layout Based on the MCDA Approach at a Campus Scale
title_full Optimization and Benefit Assessment of LID Layout Based on the MCDA Approach at a Campus Scale
title_fullStr Optimization and Benefit Assessment of LID Layout Based on the MCDA Approach at a Campus Scale
title_full_unstemmed Optimization and Benefit Assessment of LID Layout Based on the MCDA Approach at a Campus Scale
title_short Optimization and Benefit Assessment of LID Layout Based on the MCDA Approach at a Campus Scale
title_sort optimization and benefit assessment of lid layout based on the mcda approach at a campus scale
topic stormwater management
LID layout
SWMM
NSGA-II
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
Sustainable Cities and Communities (SDG)
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1434
work_keys_str_mv AT zexinlei optimizationandbenefitassessmentoflidlayoutbasedonthemcdaapproachatacampusscale
AT lijunli optimizationandbenefitassessmentoflidlayoutbasedonthemcdaapproachatacampusscale
AT yanrouwei optimizationandbenefitassessmentoflidlayoutbasedonthemcdaapproachatacampusscale
AT wenzhengzhang optimizationandbenefitassessmentoflidlayoutbasedonthemcdaapproachatacampusscale
AT junjieluo optimizationandbenefitassessmentoflidlayoutbasedonthemcdaapproachatacampusscale
AT xuqiangzhao optimizationandbenefitassessmentoflidlayoutbasedonthemcdaapproachatacampusscale