Comparison between the Correlations of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Visual Field Defects in Standard Automated White-on-White Perimetry versus Pulsar Perimetry

Purpose. To compare the structure-function relationships between retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) and visual field defects measured either by standard automated perimetry (SAP) or by Pulsar perimetry (PP). Materials and Methods. 263 eyes of 143 patients were prospectively included. Depend...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maged Alnawaiseh, Lisann Hömberg, Nicole Eter, Verena Prokosch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8014294
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850162964271726592
author Maged Alnawaiseh
Lisann Hömberg
Nicole Eter
Verena Prokosch
author_facet Maged Alnawaiseh
Lisann Hömberg
Nicole Eter
Verena Prokosch
author_sort Maged Alnawaiseh
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. To compare the structure-function relationships between retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) and visual field defects measured either by standard automated perimetry (SAP) or by Pulsar perimetry (PP). Materials and Methods. 263 eyes of 143 patients were prospectively included. Depending on the RNFLT, patients were assigned to the glaucoma group (group A: RNFL score 3–6) or the control group (group B: RNFL score 0–2). Structure-function relationships between RNFLT and mean sensitivity (MS) measured by SAP and PP were analyzed. Results. Throughout the entire group, the MS assessed by PP and SAP correlated significantly with RNFLT in all sectors. In the glaucoma group, there was no significant difference between the correlations RNFL-SAP and RNFL-PP, whereas a significant difference was found in the control group. Conclusions. In the control group, the correlation between structure and function based on the PP data was significantly stronger than that based on SAP.
format Article
id doaj-art-eeb1ea38f58a4c86b2cabf846ffb653c
institution OA Journals
issn 2090-004X
2090-0058
language English
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-eeb1ea38f58a4c86b2cabf846ffb653c2025-08-20T02:22:25ZengWileyJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582017-01-01201710.1155/2017/80142948014294Comparison between the Correlations of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Visual Field Defects in Standard Automated White-on-White Perimetry versus Pulsar PerimetryMaged Alnawaiseh0Lisann Hömberg1Nicole Eter2Verena Prokosch3Department of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Muenster, GermanyDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Muenster, GermanyDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Muenster, GermanyDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Mainz, Mainz, GermanyPurpose. To compare the structure-function relationships between retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) and visual field defects measured either by standard automated perimetry (SAP) or by Pulsar perimetry (PP). Materials and Methods. 263 eyes of 143 patients were prospectively included. Depending on the RNFLT, patients were assigned to the glaucoma group (group A: RNFL score 3–6) or the control group (group B: RNFL score 0–2). Structure-function relationships between RNFLT and mean sensitivity (MS) measured by SAP and PP were analyzed. Results. Throughout the entire group, the MS assessed by PP and SAP correlated significantly with RNFLT in all sectors. In the glaucoma group, there was no significant difference between the correlations RNFL-SAP and RNFL-PP, whereas a significant difference was found in the control group. Conclusions. In the control group, the correlation between structure and function based on the PP data was significantly stronger than that based on SAP.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8014294
spellingShingle Maged Alnawaiseh
Lisann Hömberg
Nicole Eter
Verena Prokosch
Comparison between the Correlations of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Visual Field Defects in Standard Automated White-on-White Perimetry versus Pulsar Perimetry
Journal of Ophthalmology
title Comparison between the Correlations of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Visual Field Defects in Standard Automated White-on-White Perimetry versus Pulsar Perimetry
title_full Comparison between the Correlations of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Visual Field Defects in Standard Automated White-on-White Perimetry versus Pulsar Perimetry
title_fullStr Comparison between the Correlations of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Visual Field Defects in Standard Automated White-on-White Perimetry versus Pulsar Perimetry
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between the Correlations of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Visual Field Defects in Standard Automated White-on-White Perimetry versus Pulsar Perimetry
title_short Comparison between the Correlations of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Visual Field Defects in Standard Automated White-on-White Perimetry versus Pulsar Perimetry
title_sort comparison between the correlations of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography and visual field defects in standard automated white on white perimetry versus pulsar perimetry
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8014294
work_keys_str_mv AT magedalnawaiseh comparisonbetweenthecorrelationsofretinalnervefiberlayerthicknessmeasuredbyspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyandvisualfielddefectsinstandardautomatedwhiteonwhiteperimetryversuspulsarperimetry
AT lisannhomberg comparisonbetweenthecorrelationsofretinalnervefiberlayerthicknessmeasuredbyspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyandvisualfielddefectsinstandardautomatedwhiteonwhiteperimetryversuspulsarperimetry
AT nicoleeter comparisonbetweenthecorrelationsofretinalnervefiberlayerthicknessmeasuredbyspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyandvisualfielddefectsinstandardautomatedwhiteonwhiteperimetryversuspulsarperimetry
AT verenaprokosch comparisonbetweenthecorrelationsofretinalnervefiberlayerthicknessmeasuredbyspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyandvisualfielddefectsinstandardautomatedwhiteonwhiteperimetryversuspulsarperimetry