Challenges of Post-December 1989 Romanian Journalism

More vulnerable than its former communist “sisters”, pre-communist Romania had not enjoyed a “secondary society” (the germs of a “civil society” or of a “public sphere and clandestine or alternative media”). When the regime changed, it “woke up” in capitalism, with the few existing media institutio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ștefania BEJAN
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galati University Press 2025-03-01
Series:ACROSS
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.gup.ugal.ro/ugaljournals/index.php/across/article/view/7436
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850185135333310464
author Ștefania BEJAN
author_facet Ștefania BEJAN
author_sort Ștefania BEJAN
collection DOAJ
description More vulnerable than its former communist “sisters”, pre-communist Romania had not enjoyed a “secondary society” (the germs of a “civil society” or of a “public sphere and clandestine or alternative media”). When the regime changed, it “woke up” in capitalism, with the few existing media institutions being eager to change, but also conditioned by the new existential paradigm of market economy. Employers and employees, collaborators and consumers were entering a new world, with different desiderata and different rules. They all had, in mind and/or declaratively, a dream: to be able to express themselves freely. The definition, perception and exercise of this freedom have been complicated in the Romanian public space, which is dominated, according to the Western model, by the media. Which law regulates journalistic activity? What is the moral probity of the leaders of post-communist Romanian media? With what diplomas can journalists support the exercise of their profession? How can the trust of the public be earned, since the same public had been lied to for half a century, under the censorship of the Communist Party? Is it acceptable not to immediately replace the law regulating the media? What about the uncertain status of journalists? Under the “empire” of freedom of expression, do excess language and slander do good (M. Coman)? What about the complicity of the “Messiah journalist” with commercial and political Power, even though we were living in a post-communist “ill society” (Ibidem)?
format Article
id doaj-art-ee9d598e344f4fbc8f3f141dc9099147
institution OA Journals
issn 2602-1463
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Galati University Press
record_format Article
series ACROSS
spelling doaj-art-ee9d598e344f4fbc8f3f141dc90991472025-08-20T02:16:49ZengGalati University PressACROSS2602-14632025-03-017110.35219/across.2023.1.01Challenges of Post-December 1989 Romanian JournalismȘtefania BEJAN0Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Iasi, Romania More vulnerable than its former communist “sisters”, pre-communist Romania had not enjoyed a “secondary society” (the germs of a “civil society” or of a “public sphere and clandestine or alternative media”). When the regime changed, it “woke up” in capitalism, with the few existing media institutions being eager to change, but also conditioned by the new existential paradigm of market economy. Employers and employees, collaborators and consumers were entering a new world, with different desiderata and different rules. They all had, in mind and/or declaratively, a dream: to be able to express themselves freely. The definition, perception and exercise of this freedom have been complicated in the Romanian public space, which is dominated, according to the Western model, by the media. Which law regulates journalistic activity? What is the moral probity of the leaders of post-communist Romanian media? With what diplomas can journalists support the exercise of their profession? How can the trust of the public be earned, since the same public had been lied to for half a century, under the censorship of the Communist Party? Is it acceptable not to immediately replace the law regulating the media? What about the uncertain status of journalists? Under the “empire” of freedom of expression, do excess language and slander do good (M. Coman)? What about the complicity of the “Messiah journalist” with commercial and political Power, even though we were living in a post-communist “ill society” (Ibidem)? https://www.gup.ugal.ro/ugaljournals/index.php/across/article/view/7436civil societyfreedom of speechpublic spacejournalistic practicescredibility
spellingShingle Ștefania BEJAN
Challenges of Post-December 1989 Romanian Journalism
ACROSS
civil society
freedom of speech
public space
journalistic practices
credibility
title Challenges of Post-December 1989 Romanian Journalism
title_full Challenges of Post-December 1989 Romanian Journalism
title_fullStr Challenges of Post-December 1989 Romanian Journalism
title_full_unstemmed Challenges of Post-December 1989 Romanian Journalism
title_short Challenges of Post-December 1989 Romanian Journalism
title_sort challenges of post december 1989 romanian journalism
topic civil society
freedom of speech
public space
journalistic practices
credibility
url https://www.gup.ugal.ro/ugaljournals/index.php/across/article/view/7436
work_keys_str_mv AT stefaniabejan challengesofpostdecember1989romanianjournalism