Representation of Radiation Oncologists on National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guideline Committees

Purpose: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline committees (GCs) play a vital role in defining the standard of care for cancer management. Equitable specialty representation is crucial for unbiased recommendations and perspectives. This study examines the specialty and leadership...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bismarck C. Odei, MD, Temitope Agabalogun, MD, Erika Bello-Pardo, BS, Christina Huang, MD, MS, Daniel Vanderbilt, MD, PhD, Seyi Omeh, MD, MPH, Benjamin Sterling, Fumiko Chino, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-06-01
Series:Advances in Radiation Oncology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109425000612
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849744737638023168
author Bismarck C. Odei, MD
Temitope Agabalogun, MD
Erika Bello-Pardo, BS
Christina Huang, MD, MS
Daniel Vanderbilt, MD, PhD
Seyi Omeh, MD, MPH
Benjamin Sterling
Fumiko Chino, MD
author_facet Bismarck C. Odei, MD
Temitope Agabalogun, MD
Erika Bello-Pardo, BS
Christina Huang, MD, MS
Daniel Vanderbilt, MD, PhD
Seyi Omeh, MD, MPH
Benjamin Sterling
Fumiko Chino, MD
author_sort Bismarck C. Odei, MD
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline committees (GCs) play a vital role in defining the standard of care for cancer management. Equitable specialty representation is crucial for unbiased recommendations and perspectives. This study examines the specialty and leadership representation on NCCN GCs, with a focus on radiation oncologists (ROs). Methods and Materials: This cross-sectional observational study evaluated committee member characteristics on NCCN treatment GCs available in 2020 and subset of committees with guidelines containing category 1 or 2A radiation therapy recommendations. Collected data included member characteristics and committee roles. Interspecialty variance was evaluated via χ2 tests. Results: A total of 1768 NCCN committee members were identified, representing 54 NCCN GCs with a median committee size of 33 (range, 22-38). Among all members: 47.6% were medical oncologists (MOs), 20.9% were surgical oncologists (SOs), and 8.9% were RO; 22.6% were other specialists. Women accounted for 37.6% (316/841) of MO, 34.2%(54/158) of RO and 22.8% (84/369) of SO members (P < .001). RO representation varied based on disease site (2.4%-29.9%; 15 individual committees had no RO representation) and in leadership roles (3% chairs, 23% vice chairs). On 38 committees with guidelines containing category 1 or 2A radiation therapy recommendations, the pattern of low representation persisted (8.4%). Although 39% of individuals on all committees were women, only 23% of committee chairs were women (P = .048). Conclusion: There is low representation of ROs on NCCN GCs and in leadership roles, which may limit the discussion during guideline development and negatively impact the diversity of perspectives in management recommendations.
format Article
id doaj-art-ee9aa3315b3a4300bc7e83c82b65b00e
institution DOAJ
issn 2452-1094
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Advances in Radiation Oncology
spelling doaj-art-ee9aa3315b3a4300bc7e83c82b65b00e2025-08-20T03:09:45ZengElsevierAdvances in Radiation Oncology2452-10942025-06-0110610177310.1016/j.adro.2025.101773Representation of Radiation Oncologists on National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guideline CommitteesBismarck C. Odei, MD0Temitope Agabalogun, MD1Erika Bello-Pardo, BS2Christina Huang, MD, MS3Daniel Vanderbilt, MD, PhD4Seyi Omeh, MD, MPH5Benjamin Sterling6Fumiko Chino, MD7Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; Corresponding author: Bismarck C. Odei, MDWashington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, MissouriWexner Medical Center, Ohio State University, Columbus OhioDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham North CarolinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, MultiCare Regional Cancer, Tacoma WashingtonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CaliforniaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UtahDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York New YorkPurpose: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline committees (GCs) play a vital role in defining the standard of care for cancer management. Equitable specialty representation is crucial for unbiased recommendations and perspectives. This study examines the specialty and leadership representation on NCCN GCs, with a focus on radiation oncologists (ROs). Methods and Materials: This cross-sectional observational study evaluated committee member characteristics on NCCN treatment GCs available in 2020 and subset of committees with guidelines containing category 1 or 2A radiation therapy recommendations. Collected data included member characteristics and committee roles. Interspecialty variance was evaluated via χ2 tests. Results: A total of 1768 NCCN committee members were identified, representing 54 NCCN GCs with a median committee size of 33 (range, 22-38). Among all members: 47.6% were medical oncologists (MOs), 20.9% were surgical oncologists (SOs), and 8.9% were RO; 22.6% were other specialists. Women accounted for 37.6% (316/841) of MO, 34.2%(54/158) of RO and 22.8% (84/369) of SO members (P < .001). RO representation varied based on disease site (2.4%-29.9%; 15 individual committees had no RO representation) and in leadership roles (3% chairs, 23% vice chairs). On 38 committees with guidelines containing category 1 or 2A radiation therapy recommendations, the pattern of low representation persisted (8.4%). Although 39% of individuals on all committees were women, only 23% of committee chairs were women (P = .048). Conclusion: There is low representation of ROs on NCCN GCs and in leadership roles, which may limit the discussion during guideline development and negatively impact the diversity of perspectives in management recommendations.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109425000612
spellingShingle Bismarck C. Odei, MD
Temitope Agabalogun, MD
Erika Bello-Pardo, BS
Christina Huang, MD, MS
Daniel Vanderbilt, MD, PhD
Seyi Omeh, MD, MPH
Benjamin Sterling
Fumiko Chino, MD
Representation of Radiation Oncologists on National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guideline Committees
Advances in Radiation Oncology
title Representation of Radiation Oncologists on National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guideline Committees
title_full Representation of Radiation Oncologists on National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guideline Committees
title_fullStr Representation of Radiation Oncologists on National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guideline Committees
title_full_unstemmed Representation of Radiation Oncologists on National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guideline Committees
title_short Representation of Radiation Oncologists on National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guideline Committees
title_sort representation of radiation oncologists on national comprehensive cancer network guideline committees
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109425000612
work_keys_str_mv AT bismarckcodeimd representationofradiationoncologistsonnationalcomprehensivecancernetworkguidelinecommittees
AT temitopeagabalogunmd representationofradiationoncologistsonnationalcomprehensivecancernetworkguidelinecommittees
AT erikabellopardobs representationofradiationoncologistsonnationalcomprehensivecancernetworkguidelinecommittees
AT christinahuangmdms representationofradiationoncologistsonnationalcomprehensivecancernetworkguidelinecommittees
AT danielvanderbiltmdphd representationofradiationoncologistsonnationalcomprehensivecancernetworkguidelinecommittees
AT seyiomehmdmph representationofradiationoncologistsonnationalcomprehensivecancernetworkguidelinecommittees
AT benjaminsterling representationofradiationoncologistsonnationalcomprehensivecancernetworkguidelinecommittees
AT fumikochinomd representationofradiationoncologistsonnationalcomprehensivecancernetworkguidelinecommittees