Characterisation of Adrenal Masses with Contrast Enhanced Computed TomographyAdrenal Protocol: A Cross-sectional Study

Introduction: Adrenal masses are increasingly identified due to advancements in cross-sectional imaging. Radiology is critical in differentiating benign from malignant adrenal lesions, aiding in appropriate clinical management. Adrenal masses can arise from primary neoplasms, metastasis, hemorrhage,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hrishikesh Choudhury, Rishabh, Sushant Agarwal, BK Duara, Mousumi Gogoi, Baloy Jyoti Talukdar, Bhaskar Das, Subhosree Dey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2025-02-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/20623/76559_CE[Ra1]_F(SHU)_QC(PS_SS)_PF1(VD_OM)_redo_PFA(IS)_PB(VD_IS)_PN(IS).pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850284780010078208
author Hrishikesh Choudhury
Rishabh
Sushant Agarwal
BK Duara
Mousumi Gogoi
Baloy Jyoti Talukdar
Bhaskar Das
Subhosree Dey
author_facet Hrishikesh Choudhury
Rishabh
Sushant Agarwal
BK Duara
Mousumi Gogoi
Baloy Jyoti Talukdar
Bhaskar Das
Subhosree Dey
author_sort Hrishikesh Choudhury
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Adrenal masses are increasingly identified due to advancements in cross-sectional imaging. Radiology is critical in differentiating benign from malignant adrenal lesions, aiding in appropriate clinical management. Adrenal masses can arise from primary neoplasms, metastasis, hemorrhage, or hormonal stimulation, with adenomas and metastasis being the most common types. Characterising these masses is essential, as malignancy in adrenal lesions may indicate incurable primary disease, while benign lesions allow for curative treatment approaches. Aim: To assess the accuracy of the Contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) washout study in characterising adrenal masses as benign or malignant. Materials and Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Radiodiagnosis, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India from August 2022 to December 2023 on 50 patients with 53 adrenal masses. Patients underwent CECT using a Philips brilliance iCT 256-slice machine. Adrenal masses with non enhanced attenuation values over 10 Hounsfield Units (HU) were evaluated through Absolute Percentage Washout (APW) and Relative Percentage Washout (RPW) criteria. APW and RPW thresholds of 60% and 40%, respectively, were used to classify masses as adenomas. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 21.0. Continuous variables were expressed as mean±SD, and an Independent t-test was used for comparison. Categorical variables were expressed in terms of frequency and percentage, and variables were compared using the Chi-square test. Parameters between adenomas (benign adrenal masses) and non adenomas (malignant adrenal masses) were compared, with significance set at p-value <0.05. Results: A total of 53 adrenal masses were evaluated in 50 patients (29 males and 21 females) with a mean age of 53.02±13.98 years (range: 27-77 years). After Histopathological Examination (HPE), it was determined that 24 of the masses were adrenal adenomas, i.e., benign adrenal masses, whereas the remaining 29 masses were classified as non adenomas, i.e., malignant adrenal masses. Malignant lesions were significantly larger than benign adenomas (p-value=0.026) and showed lower APW and RPW values. Using a 60% APW threshold, the sensitivity and specificity for differentiating adenomas were 89.6% and 95.8%, respectively. The RPW method with a 40% cut-off yielded a sensitivity of 86.2% and specificity of 91.7. Conclusion: The CECT washout studies demonstrate high accuracy in characterising adrenal masses, with APW and RPW showing robust sensitivity and specificity.
format Article
id doaj-art-ee8f7b81b755492a9d0dbc6dc17dbe73
institution OA Journals
issn 2249-782X
0973-709X
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
spelling doaj-art-ee8f7b81b755492a9d0dbc6dc17dbe732025-08-20T01:47:28ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2025-02-011902010510.7860/JCDR/2025/76559.20623Characterisation of Adrenal Masses with Contrast Enhanced Computed TomographyAdrenal Protocol: A Cross-sectional StudyHrishikesh Choudhury0Rishabh1Sushant Agarwal2BK Duara3Mousumi Gogoi4Baloy Jyoti Talukdar5Bhaskar Das6Subhosree Dey7Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India.Postgraduate Trainee, Department of Radiology, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India.Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India.Professor, Department of Radiology, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India.Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India.Senior Resident, Department of Radiology, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India.Senior Resident, Department of Radiology, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India.Senior Resident, Department of Radiology, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India.Introduction: Adrenal masses are increasingly identified due to advancements in cross-sectional imaging. Radiology is critical in differentiating benign from malignant adrenal lesions, aiding in appropriate clinical management. Adrenal masses can arise from primary neoplasms, metastasis, hemorrhage, or hormonal stimulation, with adenomas and metastasis being the most common types. Characterising these masses is essential, as malignancy in adrenal lesions may indicate incurable primary disease, while benign lesions allow for curative treatment approaches. Aim: To assess the accuracy of the Contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) washout study in characterising adrenal masses as benign or malignant. Materials and Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Radiodiagnosis, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India from August 2022 to December 2023 on 50 patients with 53 adrenal masses. Patients underwent CECT using a Philips brilliance iCT 256-slice machine. Adrenal masses with non enhanced attenuation values over 10 Hounsfield Units (HU) were evaluated through Absolute Percentage Washout (APW) and Relative Percentage Washout (RPW) criteria. APW and RPW thresholds of 60% and 40%, respectively, were used to classify masses as adenomas. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 21.0. Continuous variables were expressed as mean±SD, and an Independent t-test was used for comparison. Categorical variables were expressed in terms of frequency and percentage, and variables were compared using the Chi-square test. Parameters between adenomas (benign adrenal masses) and non adenomas (malignant adrenal masses) were compared, with significance set at p-value <0.05. Results: A total of 53 adrenal masses were evaluated in 50 patients (29 males and 21 females) with a mean age of 53.02±13.98 years (range: 27-77 years). After Histopathological Examination (HPE), it was determined that 24 of the masses were adrenal adenomas, i.e., benign adrenal masses, whereas the remaining 29 masses were classified as non adenomas, i.e., malignant adrenal masses. Malignant lesions were significantly larger than benign adenomas (p-value=0.026) and showed lower APW and RPW values. Using a 60% APW threshold, the sensitivity and specificity for differentiating adenomas were 89.6% and 95.8%, respectively. The RPW method with a 40% cut-off yielded a sensitivity of 86.2% and specificity of 91.7. Conclusion: The CECT washout studies demonstrate high accuracy in characterising adrenal masses, with APW and RPW showing robust sensitivity and specificity.https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/20623/76559_CE[Ra1]_F(SHU)_QC(PS_SS)_PF1(VD_OM)_redo_PFA(IS)_PB(VD_IS)_PN(IS).pdfadenomasbenign lesionsdiagnostic accuracymalignant lesionswashout percentage
spellingShingle Hrishikesh Choudhury
Rishabh
Sushant Agarwal
BK Duara
Mousumi Gogoi
Baloy Jyoti Talukdar
Bhaskar Das
Subhosree Dey
Characterisation of Adrenal Masses with Contrast Enhanced Computed TomographyAdrenal Protocol: A Cross-sectional Study
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
adenomas
benign lesions
diagnostic accuracy
malignant lesions
washout percentage
title Characterisation of Adrenal Masses with Contrast Enhanced Computed TomographyAdrenal Protocol: A Cross-sectional Study
title_full Characterisation of Adrenal Masses with Contrast Enhanced Computed TomographyAdrenal Protocol: A Cross-sectional Study
title_fullStr Characterisation of Adrenal Masses with Contrast Enhanced Computed TomographyAdrenal Protocol: A Cross-sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Characterisation of Adrenal Masses with Contrast Enhanced Computed TomographyAdrenal Protocol: A Cross-sectional Study
title_short Characterisation of Adrenal Masses with Contrast Enhanced Computed TomographyAdrenal Protocol: A Cross-sectional Study
title_sort characterisation of adrenal masses with contrast enhanced computed tomographyadrenal protocol a cross sectional study
topic adenomas
benign lesions
diagnostic accuracy
malignant lesions
washout percentage
url https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/20623/76559_CE[Ra1]_F(SHU)_QC(PS_SS)_PF1(VD_OM)_redo_PFA(IS)_PB(VD_IS)_PN(IS).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hrishikeshchoudhury characterisationofadrenalmasseswithcontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyadrenalprotocolacrosssectionalstudy
AT rishabh characterisationofadrenalmasseswithcontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyadrenalprotocolacrosssectionalstudy
AT sushantagarwal characterisationofadrenalmasseswithcontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyadrenalprotocolacrosssectionalstudy
AT bkduara characterisationofadrenalmasseswithcontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyadrenalprotocolacrosssectionalstudy
AT mousumigogoi characterisationofadrenalmasseswithcontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyadrenalprotocolacrosssectionalstudy
AT baloyjyotitalukdar characterisationofadrenalmasseswithcontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyadrenalprotocolacrosssectionalstudy
AT bhaskardas characterisationofadrenalmasseswithcontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyadrenalprotocolacrosssectionalstudy
AT subhosreedey characterisationofadrenalmasseswithcontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyadrenalprotocolacrosssectionalstudy