The influence of text segmentation on garden path processing: evidence from self-paced reading and eye-tracking

Line breaks are ubiquitous in continuous text, as in this article. Despite this prevalence, their effects on parsing and interpretation have been markedly understudied in previous research on written language processing. To shed light on these effects, we conducted a self-paced reading and an eye-tr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andromachi Tsoukala, Margreet Vogelzang, Ianthi Maria Tsimpli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2025-01-01
Series:Language and Cognition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1866980825100094/type/journal_article
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850073736338735104
author Andromachi Tsoukala
Margreet Vogelzang
Ianthi Maria Tsimpli
author_facet Andromachi Tsoukala
Margreet Vogelzang
Ianthi Maria Tsimpli
author_sort Andromachi Tsoukala
collection DOAJ
description Line breaks are ubiquitous in continuous text, as in this article. Despite this prevalence, their effects on parsing and interpretation have been markedly understudied in previous research on written language processing. To shed light on these effects, we conducted a self-paced reading and an eye-tracking study in which participants read multiline texts that contained direct object–subject ambiguity, a type of temporary clause boundary ambiguity. Within these texts, we manipulated the placement of line breaks so that they either regularly coincided or clashed with clause boundaries. We hypothesised that this manipulation would cause readers to adjust their parsing strategies and interpretative commitments. Results revealed that the way in which text is segmented through line breaks can significantly affect how readers parse syntactically ambiguous structures. While coinciding line breaks and clause boundaries helped readers arrive at the correct analysis of the ambiguous structures, cases of line break and clause boundary clash led readers down the garden path during online processing, and in some cases also impacted their comprehension. Findings are discussed in terms of their implications for the importance of text segmentation in real-world settings, such as books, educational material and digital content.
format Article
id doaj-art-ee6ce559bbf04bb19630f146e54e3dd3
institution DOAJ
issn 1866-9808
1866-9859
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Language and Cognition
spelling doaj-art-ee6ce559bbf04bb19630f146e54e3dd32025-08-20T02:46:44ZengCambridge University PressLanguage and Cognition1866-98081866-98592025-01-011710.1017/langcog.2025.10009The influence of text segmentation on garden path processing: evidence from self-paced reading and eye-trackingAndromachi Tsoukala0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8930-2408Margreet Vogelzang1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2811-5419Ianthi Maria Tsimpli2Institut für Niederlandistik, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, GermanySchool of Psychology, https://ror.org/01kj2bm70 Newcastle University , Newcastle upon Tyne, UK Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, https://ror.org/013meh722 University of Cambridge , Cambridge, UKDepartment of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, https://ror.org/013meh722 University of Cambridge , Cambridge, UKLine breaks are ubiquitous in continuous text, as in this article. Despite this prevalence, their effects on parsing and interpretation have been markedly understudied in previous research on written language processing. To shed light on these effects, we conducted a self-paced reading and an eye-tracking study in which participants read multiline texts that contained direct object–subject ambiguity, a type of temporary clause boundary ambiguity. Within these texts, we manipulated the placement of line breaks so that they either regularly coincided or clashed with clause boundaries. We hypothesised that this manipulation would cause readers to adjust their parsing strategies and interpretative commitments. Results revealed that the way in which text is segmented through line breaks can significantly affect how readers parse syntactically ambiguous structures. While coinciding line breaks and clause boundaries helped readers arrive at the correct analysis of the ambiguous structures, cases of line break and clause boundary clash led readers down the garden path during online processing, and in some cases also impacted their comprehension. Findings are discussed in terms of their implications for the importance of text segmentation in real-world settings, such as books, educational material and digital content.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1866980825100094/type/journal_articleimplicit prosodyline breaksprimingreadingsyntactic ambiguitytext segmentation
spellingShingle Andromachi Tsoukala
Margreet Vogelzang
Ianthi Maria Tsimpli
The influence of text segmentation on garden path processing: evidence from self-paced reading and eye-tracking
Language and Cognition
implicit prosody
line breaks
priming
reading
syntactic ambiguity
text segmentation
title The influence of text segmentation on garden path processing: evidence from self-paced reading and eye-tracking
title_full The influence of text segmentation on garden path processing: evidence from self-paced reading and eye-tracking
title_fullStr The influence of text segmentation on garden path processing: evidence from self-paced reading and eye-tracking
title_full_unstemmed The influence of text segmentation on garden path processing: evidence from self-paced reading and eye-tracking
title_short The influence of text segmentation on garden path processing: evidence from self-paced reading and eye-tracking
title_sort influence of text segmentation on garden path processing evidence from self paced reading and eye tracking
topic implicit prosody
line breaks
priming
reading
syntactic ambiguity
text segmentation
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1866980825100094/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT andromachitsoukala theinfluenceoftextsegmentationongardenpathprocessingevidencefromselfpacedreadingandeyetracking
AT margreetvogelzang theinfluenceoftextsegmentationongardenpathprocessingevidencefromselfpacedreadingandeyetracking
AT ianthimariatsimpli theinfluenceoftextsegmentationongardenpathprocessingevidencefromselfpacedreadingandeyetracking
AT andromachitsoukala influenceoftextsegmentationongardenpathprocessingevidencefromselfpacedreadingandeyetracking
AT margreetvogelzang influenceoftextsegmentationongardenpathprocessingevidencefromselfpacedreadingandeyetracking
AT ianthimariatsimpli influenceoftextsegmentationongardenpathprocessingevidencefromselfpacedreadingandeyetracking