Health and associated economic benefits of reduced air pollution and increased physical activity from climate change policies in the UK

Climate change policies do not always include analysis of air quality and physical activity co-benefits. We compared business as usual (BAU) UK policy with Net Zero scenarios from the UK Climate Change Committee for road transport and building sectors. We quantified and monetised the health benefits...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Heather Walton, David Dajnak, Mike Holland, Dimitris Evangelopoulos, Dylan Wood, Christian Brand, Nosha Assareh, Gregor Stewart, Andrew Beddows, Shawn YC Lee, Daniela Fecht, Yunzhe Liu, Bethan Davies, Anna Goodman, Tuan Vu, Sean Beevers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-02-01
Series:Environment International
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412025000340
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1825206989906509824
author Heather Walton
David Dajnak
Mike Holland
Dimitris Evangelopoulos
Dylan Wood
Christian Brand
Nosha Assareh
Gregor Stewart
Andrew Beddows
Shawn YC Lee
Daniela Fecht
Yunzhe Liu
Bethan Davies
Anna Goodman
Tuan Vu
Sean Beevers
author_facet Heather Walton
David Dajnak
Mike Holland
Dimitris Evangelopoulos
Dylan Wood
Christian Brand
Nosha Assareh
Gregor Stewart
Andrew Beddows
Shawn YC Lee
Daniela Fecht
Yunzhe Liu
Bethan Davies
Anna Goodman
Tuan Vu
Sean Beevers
author_sort Heather Walton
collection DOAJ
description Climate change policies do not always include analysis of air quality and physical activity co-benefits. We compared business as usual (BAU) UK policy with Net Zero scenarios from the UK Climate Change Committee for road transport and building sectors. We quantified and monetised the health benefits of the Balanced Net Zero (BNZP) and Widespread Innovation (WI) Pathways.Air pollution concentrations were predicted using Chemical Transport Models and population-weighted. Shifts from car to walking and cycling for transport were converted to METhrs/week. Literature concentration–response functions were combined with baseline rates from routine statistics/other sources. Mortality and multi-morbidity impacts were calculated using lifetable analysis, and an incidence/prevalence model from 2019 to 2154 (a lifetime after 2050). Monetary values were applied to the results.The BNZP policy compared with BAU gave 4.9 (95 % confidence interval 1.0–9.0) million life-years gained (LYG) (UK population, to 2154), including 1.1 (0.7–1.6) million LYG from active travel improvements. Avoided COPD and childhood asthma cases were 201,000 (150,000 – 250,000) and 192,000 (64,600–311,000). The monetised air quality morbidity benefits (£52.1 (36.4 – 67.8) billion) substantially added to the air quality mortality benefits (£77.9 (42.9 to 90.8) billion). Total yearly monetised benefits for BNZP vs BAU summed to 2154 (air pollution/active travel) were £153 (122 to 184) billion (core); 278 (228 to 334) billion (+outcomes with weaker evidence).Adding the effects of air pollution reductions on disease incidence, with effects of air pollution and physical activity on mortality, increases the monetised benefits that may justify Net Zero policies in cost-benefit analysis.
format Article
id doaj-art-ee588ee56bac4ec3b5185be0d8197597
institution Kabale University
issn 0160-4120
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Environment International
spelling doaj-art-ee588ee56bac4ec3b5185be0d81975972025-02-07T04:46:38ZengElsevierEnvironment International0160-41202025-02-01196109283Health and associated economic benefits of reduced air pollution and increased physical activity from climate change policies in the UKHeather Walton0David Dajnak1Mike Holland2Dimitris Evangelopoulos3Dylan Wood4Christian Brand5Nosha Assareh6Gregor Stewart7Andrew Beddows8Shawn YC Lee9Daniela Fecht10Yunzhe Liu11Bethan Davies12Anna Goodman13Tuan Vu14Sean Beevers15Environmental Research Group, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK; MRC Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Environmental Exposures and Health, Imperial College London, UK; Corresponding author at: Environmental Research Group, Imperial College London, 10th Floor, Sir Michael Uren Building, White City Campus, London W12 7TA, UK.Environmental Research Group, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK; MRC Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Environmental Exposures and Health, Imperial College London, UKEcometrics Research and Consulting, Reading, UKEnvironmental Research Group, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK; MRC Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Environmental Exposures and Health, Imperial College London, UKEnvironmental Research Group, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK; MRC Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Environmental Exposures and Health, Imperial College London, UKTransport Studies Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKEnvironmental Research Group, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK; MRC Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UKEnvironmental Research Group, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK; MRC Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UKEnvironmental Research Group, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK; MRC Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UKEnvironmental Research Group, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Environmental Exposures and Health, Imperial College London, UKMRC Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Chemical and Radiation Threats and Hazards, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, UKMRC Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UKMRC Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Chemical and Radiation Threats and Hazards, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, UKFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UKEnvironmental Research Group, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK; MRC Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UKEnvironmental Research Group, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK; MRC Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Environmental Exposures and Health, Imperial College London, UKClimate change policies do not always include analysis of air quality and physical activity co-benefits. We compared business as usual (BAU) UK policy with Net Zero scenarios from the UK Climate Change Committee for road transport and building sectors. We quantified and monetised the health benefits of the Balanced Net Zero (BNZP) and Widespread Innovation (WI) Pathways.Air pollution concentrations were predicted using Chemical Transport Models and population-weighted. Shifts from car to walking and cycling for transport were converted to METhrs/week. Literature concentration–response functions were combined with baseline rates from routine statistics/other sources. Mortality and multi-morbidity impacts were calculated using lifetable analysis, and an incidence/prevalence model from 2019 to 2154 (a lifetime after 2050). Monetary values were applied to the results.The BNZP policy compared with BAU gave 4.9 (95 % confidence interval 1.0–9.0) million life-years gained (LYG) (UK population, to 2154), including 1.1 (0.7–1.6) million LYG from active travel improvements. Avoided COPD and childhood asthma cases were 201,000 (150,000 – 250,000) and 192,000 (64,600–311,000). The monetised air quality morbidity benefits (£52.1 (36.4 – 67.8) billion) substantially added to the air quality mortality benefits (£77.9 (42.9 to 90.8) billion). Total yearly monetised benefits for BNZP vs BAU summed to 2154 (air pollution/active travel) were £153 (122 to 184) billion (core); 278 (228 to 334) billion (+outcomes with weaker evidence).Adding the effects of air pollution reductions on disease incidence, with effects of air pollution and physical activity on mortality, increases the monetised benefits that may justify Net Zero policies in cost-benefit analysis.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412025000340Air pollutionPhysical activityClimate change policyHealth impact assessmentEconomic analysisNet zero
spellingShingle Heather Walton
David Dajnak
Mike Holland
Dimitris Evangelopoulos
Dylan Wood
Christian Brand
Nosha Assareh
Gregor Stewart
Andrew Beddows
Shawn YC Lee
Daniela Fecht
Yunzhe Liu
Bethan Davies
Anna Goodman
Tuan Vu
Sean Beevers
Health and associated economic benefits of reduced air pollution and increased physical activity from climate change policies in the UK
Environment International
Air pollution
Physical activity
Climate change policy
Health impact assessment
Economic analysis
Net zero
title Health and associated economic benefits of reduced air pollution and increased physical activity from climate change policies in the UK
title_full Health and associated economic benefits of reduced air pollution and increased physical activity from climate change policies in the UK
title_fullStr Health and associated economic benefits of reduced air pollution and increased physical activity from climate change policies in the UK
title_full_unstemmed Health and associated economic benefits of reduced air pollution and increased physical activity from climate change policies in the UK
title_short Health and associated economic benefits of reduced air pollution and increased physical activity from climate change policies in the UK
title_sort health and associated economic benefits of reduced air pollution and increased physical activity from climate change policies in the uk
topic Air pollution
Physical activity
Climate change policy
Health impact assessment
Economic analysis
Net zero
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412025000340
work_keys_str_mv AT heatherwalton healthandassociatedeconomicbenefitsofreducedairpollutionandincreasedphysicalactivityfromclimatechangepoliciesintheuk
AT daviddajnak healthandassociatedeconomicbenefitsofreducedairpollutionandincreasedphysicalactivityfromclimatechangepoliciesintheuk
AT mikeholland healthandassociatedeconomicbenefitsofreducedairpollutionandincreasedphysicalactivityfromclimatechangepoliciesintheuk
AT dimitrisevangelopoulos healthandassociatedeconomicbenefitsofreducedairpollutionandincreasedphysicalactivityfromclimatechangepoliciesintheuk
AT dylanwood healthandassociatedeconomicbenefitsofreducedairpollutionandincreasedphysicalactivityfromclimatechangepoliciesintheuk
AT christianbrand healthandassociatedeconomicbenefitsofreducedairpollutionandincreasedphysicalactivityfromclimatechangepoliciesintheuk
AT noshaassareh healthandassociatedeconomicbenefitsofreducedairpollutionandincreasedphysicalactivityfromclimatechangepoliciesintheuk
AT gregorstewart healthandassociatedeconomicbenefitsofreducedairpollutionandincreasedphysicalactivityfromclimatechangepoliciesintheuk
AT andrewbeddows healthandassociatedeconomicbenefitsofreducedairpollutionandincreasedphysicalactivityfromclimatechangepoliciesintheuk
AT shawnyclee healthandassociatedeconomicbenefitsofreducedairpollutionandincreasedphysicalactivityfromclimatechangepoliciesintheuk
AT danielafecht healthandassociatedeconomicbenefitsofreducedairpollutionandincreasedphysicalactivityfromclimatechangepoliciesintheuk
AT yunzheliu healthandassociatedeconomicbenefitsofreducedairpollutionandincreasedphysicalactivityfromclimatechangepoliciesintheuk
AT bethandavies healthandassociatedeconomicbenefitsofreducedairpollutionandincreasedphysicalactivityfromclimatechangepoliciesintheuk
AT annagoodman healthandassociatedeconomicbenefitsofreducedairpollutionandincreasedphysicalactivityfromclimatechangepoliciesintheuk
AT tuanvu healthandassociatedeconomicbenefitsofreducedairpollutionandincreasedphysicalactivityfromclimatechangepoliciesintheuk
AT seanbeevers healthandassociatedeconomicbenefitsofreducedairpollutionandincreasedphysicalactivityfromclimatechangepoliciesintheuk