A large scale randomized controlled trial on herding in peer-review discussions.
Peer review is the backbone of academia and humans constitute a cornerstone of this process, being responsible for reviewing submissions and making the final acceptance/rejection decisions. Given that human decision-making is known to be susceptible to various cognitive biases, it is important to un...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Ivan Stelmakh, Charvi Rastogi, Nihar B Shah, Aarti Singh, Hal Daumé |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287443 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
A randomized controlled trial on anonymizing reviewers to each other in peer review discussions.
by: Charvi Rastogi, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
How do authors' perceptions of their papers compare with co-authors' perceptions and peer-review decisions?
by: Charvi Rastogi, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Peer reviews of peer reviews: A randomized controlled trial and other experiments.
by: Alexander Goldberg, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Testing for reviewer anchoring in peer review: A randomized controlled trial.
by: Ryan Liu, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
The Herd Behavior on Peer-To-Peer Online Lending Markets: Evidence from China
by: Rong Liu, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)