Comparison of Surgical and Oncological Outcomes between Laparoscopic and Open Surgeries in Patients with Stage IA1 Cervical Cancer

Objectives: Laparoscopic surgery improves patient quality of life; however, its utility in stage IA1 cervical cancer remains debatable. This study aimed to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery in patients with stage IA1 cervical cancer. Materials and Meth...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shinichi Togami, Nozomi Furuzono, Mika Mizuno, Hiroaki Kobayashi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2025-04-01
Series:Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/gmit.GMIT-D-24-00019
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850235643155709952
author Shinichi Togami
Nozomi Furuzono
Mika Mizuno
Hiroaki Kobayashi
author_facet Shinichi Togami
Nozomi Furuzono
Mika Mizuno
Hiroaki Kobayashi
author_sort Shinichi Togami
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: Laparoscopic surgery improves patient quality of life; however, its utility in stage IA1 cervical cancer remains debatable. This study aimed to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery in patients with stage IA1 cervical cancer. Materials and Methods: Thirty-four patients, including 20 who underwent laparoscopic surgery and 14 who underwent open surgery, were enrolled in this study. The surgical and oncological outcomes were compared between the laparoscopic and open surgery groups. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed between the laparoscopic and open surgery groups in terms of median age, body mass index, final pathological type, the presence of lymphovascular space invasion, and operation time. Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery had significantly lower blood loss (38 vs. 170 mL, P < 0.001) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (5 vs. 7.5 days, P < 0.0001) than those who underwent open surgery. Oncological recurrence was observed in only one patient in the laparoscopic group (vaginal cuff). The 3-year recurrence-free survival rate was 94.7% and 100% for the laparoscopic and open surgery groups, respectively, with no statistically significant difference. Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery resulted in reduced blood loss and shorter hospital stay, with oncological outcomes comparable to those of open surgery in patients with stage IA1 cervical cancer. These findings highlight the potential benefits of laparoscopic surgery in improving surgical outcomes for patients with stage IA1 cervical cancer.
format Article
id doaj-art-ee4148f490b44cfa9dcbbdd1da3dc767
institution OA Journals
issn 2213-3070
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy
spelling doaj-art-ee4148f490b44cfa9dcbbdd1da3dc7672025-08-20T02:02:10ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsGynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy2213-30702025-04-0114215215610.4103/gmit.GMIT-D-24-00019Comparison of Surgical and Oncological Outcomes between Laparoscopic and Open Surgeries in Patients with Stage IA1 Cervical CancerShinichi TogamiNozomi FuruzonoMika MizunoHiroaki KobayashiObjectives: Laparoscopic surgery improves patient quality of life; however, its utility in stage IA1 cervical cancer remains debatable. This study aimed to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery in patients with stage IA1 cervical cancer. Materials and Methods: Thirty-four patients, including 20 who underwent laparoscopic surgery and 14 who underwent open surgery, were enrolled in this study. The surgical and oncological outcomes were compared between the laparoscopic and open surgery groups. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed between the laparoscopic and open surgery groups in terms of median age, body mass index, final pathological type, the presence of lymphovascular space invasion, and operation time. Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery had significantly lower blood loss (38 vs. 170 mL, P < 0.001) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (5 vs. 7.5 days, P < 0.0001) than those who underwent open surgery. Oncological recurrence was observed in only one patient in the laparoscopic group (vaginal cuff). The 3-year recurrence-free survival rate was 94.7% and 100% for the laparoscopic and open surgery groups, respectively, with no statistically significant difference. Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery resulted in reduced blood loss and shorter hospital stay, with oncological outcomes comparable to those of open surgery in patients with stage IA1 cervical cancer. These findings highlight the potential benefits of laparoscopic surgery in improving surgical outcomes for patients with stage IA1 cervical cancer.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/gmit.GMIT-D-24-00019cervical cancerlaparoscopyopen surgerysentinel node navigation surgery
spellingShingle Shinichi Togami
Nozomi Furuzono
Mika Mizuno
Hiroaki Kobayashi
Comparison of Surgical and Oncological Outcomes between Laparoscopic and Open Surgeries in Patients with Stage IA1 Cervical Cancer
Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy
cervical cancer
laparoscopy
open surgery
sentinel node navigation surgery
title Comparison of Surgical and Oncological Outcomes between Laparoscopic and Open Surgeries in Patients with Stage IA1 Cervical Cancer
title_full Comparison of Surgical and Oncological Outcomes between Laparoscopic and Open Surgeries in Patients with Stage IA1 Cervical Cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of Surgical and Oncological Outcomes between Laparoscopic and Open Surgeries in Patients with Stage IA1 Cervical Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Surgical and Oncological Outcomes between Laparoscopic and Open Surgeries in Patients with Stage IA1 Cervical Cancer
title_short Comparison of Surgical and Oncological Outcomes between Laparoscopic and Open Surgeries in Patients with Stage IA1 Cervical Cancer
title_sort comparison of surgical and oncological outcomes between laparoscopic and open surgeries in patients with stage ia1 cervical cancer
topic cervical cancer
laparoscopy
open surgery
sentinel node navigation surgery
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/gmit.GMIT-D-24-00019
work_keys_str_mv AT shinichitogami comparisonofsurgicalandoncologicaloutcomesbetweenlaparoscopicandopensurgeriesinpatientswithstageia1cervicalcancer
AT nozomifuruzono comparisonofsurgicalandoncologicaloutcomesbetweenlaparoscopicandopensurgeriesinpatientswithstageia1cervicalcancer
AT mikamizuno comparisonofsurgicalandoncologicaloutcomesbetweenlaparoscopicandopensurgeriesinpatientswithstageia1cervicalcancer
AT hiroakikobayashi comparisonofsurgicalandoncologicaloutcomesbetweenlaparoscopicandopensurgeriesinpatientswithstageia1cervicalcancer