Comparative outcomes of penile skin grafts versus buccal mucosal grafts in urethroplasty for the treatment of extensive anterior urethral strictures

Abstract To compare the outcomes of augmentation urethroplasty (AU) performed with either buccal mucosa graft (BMG) or penile skin graft (PSG) in managing long-segment anterior urethral strictures. A prospective randomized trial involved 98 patients diagnosed with anterior urethral stricture schedul...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmed Alrefaey, Mohamed Ahmed Anwar, Mostafa Ezzeldeen Abdelmagid, Ibrahim Alaa Eldin Tagrida, Adel Elatreisy, Ahmed Fahim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-08-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14191-w
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849333377096744960
author Ahmed Alrefaey
Mohamed Ahmed Anwar
Mostafa Ezzeldeen Abdelmagid
Ibrahim Alaa Eldin Tagrida
Adel Elatreisy
Ahmed Fahim
author_facet Ahmed Alrefaey
Mohamed Ahmed Anwar
Mostafa Ezzeldeen Abdelmagid
Ibrahim Alaa Eldin Tagrida
Adel Elatreisy
Ahmed Fahim
author_sort Ahmed Alrefaey
collection DOAJ
description Abstract To compare the outcomes of augmentation urethroplasty (AU) performed with either buccal mucosa graft (BMG) or penile skin graft (PSG) in managing long-segment anterior urethral strictures. A prospective randomized trial involved 98 patients diagnosed with anterior urethral stricture scheduled to AU between June 2022 and December 2024. Participants were randomly assigned to either the PSG or BMG arms. The comparison included patient demographics, clinicopathological characteristics of strictures, and surgical outcomes. The primary outcome was the success rate at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included functional parameters, such as the Urethral Stricture Surgery-Patient Related Outcome Measure (USS-PROM), the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Score, the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire for Ejaculatory Dysfunction (MSHQ-EJD), Q-max, and perioperative complications. The study arms were comparable regarding the preoperative parameters with a mean stricture length ± SD of 6.4 ± 2.3 and 7.9 ± 4.1 cm for PSG and BMG, respectively (p = 0.11). After a median follow-up of 20 months (12–30), the success rates of AU with PSG and BMG were comparable (93.2% v/s 97.9%, respectively; p = 0.346). There was no statistically significant difference in the IIEF (p = 0.8) and MSHQ-EJD (p = 0.22). The improvements in USS-PROM: LUTS domain (p = 0.19), USS-PROM: peeling voiding score (p = 0.62), IPSS (p = 0.43), and Q-max (p = 0.39) were comparable between the study arms. Clavien–Dindo grade I-III complications were 6.8 and 8.3% (p = 0.8), with patients’ satisfaction of 90.9% and 93.8% (p = 0.5) for PSG and BMG, respectively. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed no statistically significant difference in stricture-free survival among both techniques (hazard ratio 1.19; p = 0.275). Our study demonstrates that PSG and BMG techniques for augmentation anterior urethroplasty have high and comparable success rates, with equal patient satisfaction and similarly low morbidity. Neither technique negatively affected sexual or ejaculatory functions.
format Article
id doaj-art-ee32c9371c7a42b2aa90265feb985c02
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-ee32c9371c7a42b2aa90265feb985c022025-08-20T03:45:52ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-08-011511810.1038/s41598-025-14191-wComparative outcomes of penile skin grafts versus buccal mucosal grafts in urethroplasty for the treatment of extensive anterior urethral stricturesAhmed Alrefaey0Mohamed Ahmed Anwar1Mostafa Ezzeldeen Abdelmagid2Ibrahim Alaa Eldin Tagrida3Adel Elatreisy4Ahmed Fahim5Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar universityUrology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar universityUrology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar universityUrology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar universityUrology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar universityUrology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar universityAbstract To compare the outcomes of augmentation urethroplasty (AU) performed with either buccal mucosa graft (BMG) or penile skin graft (PSG) in managing long-segment anterior urethral strictures. A prospective randomized trial involved 98 patients diagnosed with anterior urethral stricture scheduled to AU between June 2022 and December 2024. Participants were randomly assigned to either the PSG or BMG arms. The comparison included patient demographics, clinicopathological characteristics of strictures, and surgical outcomes. The primary outcome was the success rate at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included functional parameters, such as the Urethral Stricture Surgery-Patient Related Outcome Measure (USS-PROM), the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Score, the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire for Ejaculatory Dysfunction (MSHQ-EJD), Q-max, and perioperative complications. The study arms were comparable regarding the preoperative parameters with a mean stricture length ± SD of 6.4 ± 2.3 and 7.9 ± 4.1 cm for PSG and BMG, respectively (p = 0.11). After a median follow-up of 20 months (12–30), the success rates of AU with PSG and BMG were comparable (93.2% v/s 97.9%, respectively; p = 0.346). There was no statistically significant difference in the IIEF (p = 0.8) and MSHQ-EJD (p = 0.22). The improvements in USS-PROM: LUTS domain (p = 0.19), USS-PROM: peeling voiding score (p = 0.62), IPSS (p = 0.43), and Q-max (p = 0.39) were comparable between the study arms. Clavien–Dindo grade I-III complications were 6.8 and 8.3% (p = 0.8), with patients’ satisfaction of 90.9% and 93.8% (p = 0.5) for PSG and BMG, respectively. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed no statistically significant difference in stricture-free survival among both techniques (hazard ratio 1.19; p = 0.275). Our study demonstrates that PSG and BMG techniques for augmentation anterior urethroplasty have high and comparable success rates, with equal patient satisfaction and similarly low morbidity. Neither technique negatively affected sexual or ejaculatory functions.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14191-wStrictureUrethraBuccal mucosa, penile skin, graft
spellingShingle Ahmed Alrefaey
Mohamed Ahmed Anwar
Mostafa Ezzeldeen Abdelmagid
Ibrahim Alaa Eldin Tagrida
Adel Elatreisy
Ahmed Fahim
Comparative outcomes of penile skin grafts versus buccal mucosal grafts in urethroplasty for the treatment of extensive anterior urethral strictures
Scientific Reports
Stricture
Urethra
Buccal mucosa, penile skin, graft
title Comparative outcomes of penile skin grafts versus buccal mucosal grafts in urethroplasty for the treatment of extensive anterior urethral strictures
title_full Comparative outcomes of penile skin grafts versus buccal mucosal grafts in urethroplasty for the treatment of extensive anterior urethral strictures
title_fullStr Comparative outcomes of penile skin grafts versus buccal mucosal grafts in urethroplasty for the treatment of extensive anterior urethral strictures
title_full_unstemmed Comparative outcomes of penile skin grafts versus buccal mucosal grafts in urethroplasty for the treatment of extensive anterior urethral strictures
title_short Comparative outcomes of penile skin grafts versus buccal mucosal grafts in urethroplasty for the treatment of extensive anterior urethral strictures
title_sort comparative outcomes of penile skin grafts versus buccal mucosal grafts in urethroplasty for the treatment of extensive anterior urethral strictures
topic Stricture
Urethra
Buccal mucosa, penile skin, graft
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14191-w
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedalrefaey comparativeoutcomesofpenileskingraftsversusbuccalmucosalgraftsinurethroplastyforthetreatmentofextensiveanteriorurethralstrictures
AT mohamedahmedanwar comparativeoutcomesofpenileskingraftsversusbuccalmucosalgraftsinurethroplastyforthetreatmentofextensiveanteriorurethralstrictures
AT mostafaezzeldeenabdelmagid comparativeoutcomesofpenileskingraftsversusbuccalmucosalgraftsinurethroplastyforthetreatmentofextensiveanteriorurethralstrictures
AT ibrahimalaaeldintagrida comparativeoutcomesofpenileskingraftsversusbuccalmucosalgraftsinurethroplastyforthetreatmentofextensiveanteriorurethralstrictures
AT adelelatreisy comparativeoutcomesofpenileskingraftsversusbuccalmucosalgraftsinurethroplastyforthetreatmentofextensiveanteriorurethralstrictures
AT ahmedfahim comparativeoutcomesofpenileskingraftsversusbuccalmucosalgraftsinurethroplastyforthetreatmentofextensiveanteriorurethralstrictures