Reliability of administrative data to identify sexually transmitted infections for population health: a systematic review

Introduction International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes in administrative health data are used to identify cases of disease, including sexually transmitted infections (STIs), for population health research. The purpose of this review is to examine the extant literature on the reliability o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brian E Dixon, Saurabh Rahurkar, Yenling Ho, Janet N Arno
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-01
Series:BMJ Health & Care Informatics
Online Access:https://informatics.bmj.com/content/26/1/e100074.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850204561174691840
author Brian E Dixon
Saurabh Rahurkar
Yenling Ho
Janet N Arno
author_facet Brian E Dixon
Saurabh Rahurkar
Yenling Ho
Janet N Arno
author_sort Brian E Dixon
collection DOAJ
description Introduction International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes in administrative health data are used to identify cases of disease, including sexually transmitted infections (STIs), for population health research. The purpose of this review is to examine the extant literature on the reliability of ICD codes to correctly identify STIs.Methods We conducted a systematic review of empirical articles in which ICD codes were validated with respect to their ability to identify cases of chlamydia, gonorrhoea, syphilis or pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). Articles that included sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of ICD codes were the target. In addition to keyword searches in PubMed and Scopus databases, we further examined bibliographies of articles selected for full review to maximise yield.Results From a total of 1779 articles identified, only two studies measured the reliability of ICD codes to identify cases of STIs. Both articles targeted PID, a serious complication of chlamydia and gonorrhoea. Neither article directly assessed the validity of ICD codes to identify cases of chlamydia, gonorrhoea or syphilis independent of PID. Using ICD codes alone, the positive predictive value for PID was mixed (range: 18%–79%).Discussion and conclusion While existing studies have used ICD codes to identify STI cases, their reliability is unclear. Further, available evidence from studies of PID suggests potentially large variation in the accuracy of ICD codes indicating the need for primary studies to evaluate ICD codes for use in STI-related public health research.
format Article
id doaj-art-ee2c1ace5cc84bd9ae9dcb8c2c231f0f
institution OA Journals
issn 2632-1009
language English
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Health & Care Informatics
spelling doaj-art-ee2c1ace5cc84bd9ae9dcb8c2c231f0f2025-08-20T02:11:16ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Health & Care Informatics2632-10092019-12-0126110.1136/bmjhci-2019-100074Reliability of administrative data to identify sexually transmitted infections for population health: a systematic reviewBrian E Dixon0Saurabh Rahurkar1Yenling Ho2Janet N Arno3Department of Epidemiology, Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USACenter for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USADepartment of Epidemiology, Indiana University Richard M Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USADivision of Infectious Diseases, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USAIntroduction International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes in administrative health data are used to identify cases of disease, including sexually transmitted infections (STIs), for population health research. The purpose of this review is to examine the extant literature on the reliability of ICD codes to correctly identify STIs.Methods We conducted a systematic review of empirical articles in which ICD codes were validated with respect to their ability to identify cases of chlamydia, gonorrhoea, syphilis or pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). Articles that included sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of ICD codes were the target. In addition to keyword searches in PubMed and Scopus databases, we further examined bibliographies of articles selected for full review to maximise yield.Results From a total of 1779 articles identified, only two studies measured the reliability of ICD codes to identify cases of STIs. Both articles targeted PID, a serious complication of chlamydia and gonorrhoea. Neither article directly assessed the validity of ICD codes to identify cases of chlamydia, gonorrhoea or syphilis independent of PID. Using ICD codes alone, the positive predictive value for PID was mixed (range: 18%–79%).Discussion and conclusion While existing studies have used ICD codes to identify STI cases, their reliability is unclear. Further, available evidence from studies of PID suggests potentially large variation in the accuracy of ICD codes indicating the need for primary studies to evaluate ICD codes for use in STI-related public health research.https://informatics.bmj.com/content/26/1/e100074.full
spellingShingle Brian E Dixon
Saurabh Rahurkar
Yenling Ho
Janet N Arno
Reliability of administrative data to identify sexually transmitted infections for population health: a systematic review
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
title Reliability of administrative data to identify sexually transmitted infections for population health: a systematic review
title_full Reliability of administrative data to identify sexually transmitted infections for population health: a systematic review
title_fullStr Reliability of administrative data to identify sexually transmitted infections for population health: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of administrative data to identify sexually transmitted infections for population health: a systematic review
title_short Reliability of administrative data to identify sexually transmitted infections for population health: a systematic review
title_sort reliability of administrative data to identify sexually transmitted infections for population health a systematic review
url https://informatics.bmj.com/content/26/1/e100074.full
work_keys_str_mv AT brianedixon reliabilityofadministrativedatatoidentifysexuallytransmittedinfectionsforpopulationhealthasystematicreview
AT saurabhrahurkar reliabilityofadministrativedatatoidentifysexuallytransmittedinfectionsforpopulationhealthasystematicreview
AT yenlingho reliabilityofadministrativedatatoidentifysexuallytransmittedinfectionsforpopulationhealthasystematicreview
AT janetnarno reliabilityofadministrativedatatoidentifysexuallytransmittedinfectionsforpopulationhealthasystematicreview