Analyse contrastive de la progression thématique dans les écrits d’étudiants francophones et sinophones
At the intersection of textual linguistics and intercultural rhetoric, this article examines the coherence and cohesion of texts written by French and Chinese students through the analysis of thematic progression, drawing from a comparable corpus. We aim to identify similarities and differences in t...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Presses universitaires de Caen
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Discours |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/discours/13283 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832581873668194304 |
|---|---|
| author | Tatiana Aleksandrova Qianyun Li |
| author_facet | Tatiana Aleksandrova Qianyun Li |
| author_sort | Tatiana Aleksandrova |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | At the intersection of textual linguistics and intercultural rhetoric, this article examines the coherence and cohesion of texts written by French and Chinese students through the analysis of thematic progression, drawing from a comparable corpus. We aim to identify similarities and differences in thematic progression between two typologically distant languages. Our study focuses on the paragraph, which serves as a key unit of analysis between the sentence and the entire text. There are several differences in the way paragraphs are organised in paragraph: French speakers tend to use a linear progression, while Chinese speakers prefer a constant progression. In addition, we observed differences in the linguistic devices used to indicate thematic progression. Mandarin often features zero anaphora, regardless of the type of thematic progression, while French employs explicit anaphoric repetitions. These differences are partly attributable to the syntactic properties of the two languages, such as the requirement to mark the subject in French and the omission of the third-person singular pronoun in Mandarin. Rhetorically, these divergences reflect distinct approaches to handling the subject within the paragraph, leading to varied communicative dynamics. Thus, the results offer interesting perspectives for understanding meaning construction from an intercultural point of view. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-ee0436cac03d47a8929fd7e8025d1cb4 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1963-1723 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Presses universitaires de Caen |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Discours |
| spelling | doaj-art-ee0436cac03d47a8929fd7e8025d1cb42025-01-30T09:52:57ZengPresses universitaires de CaenDiscours1963-17232024-12-013510.4000/1356yAnalyse contrastive de la progression thématique dans les écrits d’étudiants francophones et sinophonesTatiana AleksandrovaQianyun LiAt the intersection of textual linguistics and intercultural rhetoric, this article examines the coherence and cohesion of texts written by French and Chinese students through the analysis of thematic progression, drawing from a comparable corpus. We aim to identify similarities and differences in thematic progression between two typologically distant languages. Our study focuses on the paragraph, which serves as a key unit of analysis between the sentence and the entire text. There are several differences in the way paragraphs are organised in paragraph: French speakers tend to use a linear progression, while Chinese speakers prefer a constant progression. In addition, we observed differences in the linguistic devices used to indicate thematic progression. Mandarin often features zero anaphora, regardless of the type of thematic progression, while French employs explicit anaphoric repetitions. These differences are partly attributable to the syntactic properties of the two languages, such as the requirement to mark the subject in French and the omission of the third-person singular pronoun in Mandarin. Rhetorically, these divergences reflect distinct approaches to handling the subject within the paragraph, leading to varied communicative dynamics. Thus, the results offer interesting perspectives for understanding meaning construction from an intercultural point of view.https://journals.openedition.org/discours/13283anaphoracohesioncoherenceparagraphthematic progressionintercultural rhetoric |
| spellingShingle | Tatiana Aleksandrova Qianyun Li Analyse contrastive de la progression thématique dans les écrits d’étudiants francophones et sinophones Discours anaphora cohesion coherence paragraph thematic progression intercultural rhetoric |
| title | Analyse contrastive de la progression thématique dans les écrits d’étudiants francophones et sinophones |
| title_full | Analyse contrastive de la progression thématique dans les écrits d’étudiants francophones et sinophones |
| title_fullStr | Analyse contrastive de la progression thématique dans les écrits d’étudiants francophones et sinophones |
| title_full_unstemmed | Analyse contrastive de la progression thématique dans les écrits d’étudiants francophones et sinophones |
| title_short | Analyse contrastive de la progression thématique dans les écrits d’étudiants francophones et sinophones |
| title_sort | analyse contrastive de la progression thematique dans les ecrits d etudiants francophones et sinophones |
| topic | anaphora cohesion coherence paragraph thematic progression intercultural rhetoric |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/discours/13283 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT tatianaaleksandrova analysecontrastivedelaprogressionthematiquedanslesecritsdetudiantsfrancophonesetsinophones AT qianyunli analysecontrastivedelaprogressionthematiquedanslesecritsdetudiantsfrancophonesetsinophones |