Comparative outcomes of image-guided percutaneous catheterization versus direct visualization catheterization for peritoneal dialysis: A meta-analysis.

<h4>Introduction</h4>Debate persists on the optimal catheterization method for peritoneal dialysis (PD). This meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of image-guided percutaneous catheterization (IGPC) versus direct visualization catheterization (DVC) for peritoneal dialysis.<h4&g...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yi Li, Lifang Li, Meiju Wei, Yanxiong Qin, Yuechen Qin, Yue Zou, Haijian Zeng, Chunlan Li, Tingting Liao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325600
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849716663616798720
author Yi Li
Lifang Li
Meiju Wei
Yanxiong Qin
Yuechen Qin
Yue Zou
Haijian Zeng
Chunlan Li
Tingting Liao
author_facet Yi Li
Lifang Li
Meiju Wei
Yanxiong Qin
Yuechen Qin
Yue Zou
Haijian Zeng
Chunlan Li
Tingting Liao
author_sort Yi Li
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Introduction</h4>Debate persists on the optimal catheterization method for peritoneal dialysis (PD). This meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of image-guided percutaneous catheterization (IGPC) versus direct visualization catheterization (DVC) for peritoneal dialysis.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>From the inception of the database until July 16, 2024, four databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the central database) were searched for literature comparing IGPC versus DVC for peritoneal dialysis. Meta-analyses were conducted on infectious complications, mechanical complications, one-year PD catheter survival, and catheter removal rates.<h4>Results</h4>Totally 11 studies were included in this meta-analysis, comprising a total of 8,981 patients, of which 2,518 patients received IGPC and 6,463 patients received DVC. IGPC exhibited lower rates of infection complications (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.54-0.99, P = 0.04) mechanical complications (OR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.42-0.99, P = 0.04) and catheter removal compared to DVC (OR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.50-0.78, P < 0.0001). However, there was no significant difference in one-year PD catheter survival between the two groups (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 0.78-2.27, P = 0.30).<h4>Conclusions</h4>This meta-analysis concluded that IGPC was a safe and effective catheterization method for PD. The results demonstrated that IGPC significantly reduced the incidence of infection complications, mechanical complications, and catheter removal compared to DVC. No notable disparity in one-year PD survival was detected between the two groups.<h4>Trial registration</h4>PROSPERO (CRD42024606795).
format Article
id doaj-art-ee00d7f294ba4e609223966d20e912ab
institution DOAJ
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-ee00d7f294ba4e609223966d20e912ab2025-08-20T03:12:56ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01207e032560010.1371/journal.pone.0325600Comparative outcomes of image-guided percutaneous catheterization versus direct visualization catheterization for peritoneal dialysis: A meta-analysis.Yi LiLifang LiMeiju WeiYanxiong QinYuechen QinYue ZouHaijian ZengChunlan LiTingting Liao<h4>Introduction</h4>Debate persists on the optimal catheterization method for peritoneal dialysis (PD). This meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of image-guided percutaneous catheterization (IGPC) versus direct visualization catheterization (DVC) for peritoneal dialysis.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>From the inception of the database until July 16, 2024, four databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the central database) were searched for literature comparing IGPC versus DVC for peritoneal dialysis. Meta-analyses were conducted on infectious complications, mechanical complications, one-year PD catheter survival, and catheter removal rates.<h4>Results</h4>Totally 11 studies were included in this meta-analysis, comprising a total of 8,981 patients, of which 2,518 patients received IGPC and 6,463 patients received DVC. IGPC exhibited lower rates of infection complications (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.54-0.99, P = 0.04) mechanical complications (OR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.42-0.99, P = 0.04) and catheter removal compared to DVC (OR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.50-0.78, P < 0.0001). However, there was no significant difference in one-year PD catheter survival between the two groups (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 0.78-2.27, P = 0.30).<h4>Conclusions</h4>This meta-analysis concluded that IGPC was a safe and effective catheterization method for PD. The results demonstrated that IGPC significantly reduced the incidence of infection complications, mechanical complications, and catheter removal compared to DVC. No notable disparity in one-year PD survival was detected between the two groups.<h4>Trial registration</h4>PROSPERO (CRD42024606795).https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325600
spellingShingle Yi Li
Lifang Li
Meiju Wei
Yanxiong Qin
Yuechen Qin
Yue Zou
Haijian Zeng
Chunlan Li
Tingting Liao
Comparative outcomes of image-guided percutaneous catheterization versus direct visualization catheterization for peritoneal dialysis: A meta-analysis.
PLoS ONE
title Comparative outcomes of image-guided percutaneous catheterization versus direct visualization catheterization for peritoneal dialysis: A meta-analysis.
title_full Comparative outcomes of image-guided percutaneous catheterization versus direct visualization catheterization for peritoneal dialysis: A meta-analysis.
title_fullStr Comparative outcomes of image-guided percutaneous catheterization versus direct visualization catheterization for peritoneal dialysis: A meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Comparative outcomes of image-guided percutaneous catheterization versus direct visualization catheterization for peritoneal dialysis: A meta-analysis.
title_short Comparative outcomes of image-guided percutaneous catheterization versus direct visualization catheterization for peritoneal dialysis: A meta-analysis.
title_sort comparative outcomes of image guided percutaneous catheterization versus direct visualization catheterization for peritoneal dialysis a meta analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325600
work_keys_str_mv AT yili comparativeoutcomesofimageguidedpercutaneouscatheterizationversusdirectvisualizationcatheterizationforperitonealdialysisametaanalysis
AT lifangli comparativeoutcomesofimageguidedpercutaneouscatheterizationversusdirectvisualizationcatheterizationforperitonealdialysisametaanalysis
AT meijuwei comparativeoutcomesofimageguidedpercutaneouscatheterizationversusdirectvisualizationcatheterizationforperitonealdialysisametaanalysis
AT yanxiongqin comparativeoutcomesofimageguidedpercutaneouscatheterizationversusdirectvisualizationcatheterizationforperitonealdialysisametaanalysis
AT yuechenqin comparativeoutcomesofimageguidedpercutaneouscatheterizationversusdirectvisualizationcatheterizationforperitonealdialysisametaanalysis
AT yuezou comparativeoutcomesofimageguidedpercutaneouscatheterizationversusdirectvisualizationcatheterizationforperitonealdialysisametaanalysis
AT haijianzeng comparativeoutcomesofimageguidedpercutaneouscatheterizationversusdirectvisualizationcatheterizationforperitonealdialysisametaanalysis
AT chunlanli comparativeoutcomesofimageguidedpercutaneouscatheterizationversusdirectvisualizationcatheterizationforperitonealdialysisametaanalysis
AT tingtingliao comparativeoutcomesofimageguidedpercutaneouscatheterizationversusdirectvisualizationcatheterizationforperitonealdialysisametaanalysis