Insights and Trends in Open Note Access: Retrospective Observational Study
BackgroundAs of 2021, at least 4 out of every 5 hospitals offered patients access to clinical notes via a web-based patient portal, a number that is expected to grow because of the 21st Century Cures Act. There is limited data on how open note use may have evolved over time o...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Medical Internet Research |
| Online Access: | https://www.jmir.org/2024/1/e55982 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850063339706646528 |
|---|---|
| author | Randeep Singh Badwal Paul Cavo Mandip Panesar |
| author_facet | Randeep Singh Badwal Paul Cavo Mandip Panesar |
| author_sort | Randeep Singh Badwal |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
BackgroundAs of 2021, at least 4 out of every 5 hospitals offered patients access to clinical notes via a web-based patient portal, a number that is expected to grow because of the 21st Century Cures Act. There is limited data on how open note use may have evolved over time or which types of clinical interactions were viewed most in the outpatient setting.
ObjectiveThis study aims to analyze trends in outpatient open note access over time; characterize usage in terms of age, sex, and clinical interaction type; and assess the method of access to help uncover areas of improvement in patient engagement and identify further areas of research.
MethodsA retrospective observational study was conducted at Erie County Medical Center from November 1, 2021, to December 31, 2022, to coincide with the time that open notes went live. Outpatient note access and account logs were downloaded from the portal and combined into a single dataset consisting of 18,384 note accesses by 4615 users, with column headings of the patient index, sex, age, note title that was accessed, clinical interaction type, time stamp of note creation, time stamp of access, and method of access (web vs mobile). A separate table was created with sex data for all 35,273 portal accounts. Microsoft Excel and Microsoft Power Query were used to combine and analyze the data.
ResultsDuring the study period, 4615 portal users viewed 12,150 documents for a total of 18,384 times, averaging 2.6 notes per patient viewed 4 times. Only 13.1% (4615/35,273) of all portal inpatient and outpatient registrants viewed their outpatient notes. There was a female predominance in those who viewed notes (2926/4615, 63.4%; P<.001), while 56.8% (20,047/35,273) of all portal registrants were female. Users in their 30s and 50s accessed more notes than other age groups. The ratio of mobile-to-web access of notes tended to decrease as a function of increasing age, which was not observed in those aged ≥90 years. Notes regarding COVID-19 assessments were the most accessed among all clinical interactions (4725/12,150, 38.9%). Overall, the number of users accessing notes reached a maximum of 1968 before declining to 1027 by the end of the study period.
ConclusionsOpen note access was largely dominated by COVID-19 assessments, and the number of users viewing their notes has declined over time as the pandemic subsided. Furthermore, female patients and those aged in their 30s as well as 50s viewed more notes than other groups. Finally, the percentage of notes viewed via a mobile device tended to decrease as a function of increasing age, showing that web-based access of open notes is an important modality for older patients. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-ede9d0821a5b4d088b69e4d0a80bcc46 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1438-8871 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Medical Internet Research |
| spelling | doaj-art-ede9d0821a5b4d088b69e4d0a80bcc462025-08-20T02:49:39ZengJMIR PublicationsJournal of Medical Internet Research1438-88712024-12-0126e5598210.2196/55982Insights and Trends in Open Note Access: Retrospective Observational StudyRandeep Singh Badwalhttps://orcid.org/0009-0006-8428-7548Paul Cavohttps://orcid.org/0009-0001-1915-6334Mandip Panesarhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1918-7851 BackgroundAs of 2021, at least 4 out of every 5 hospitals offered patients access to clinical notes via a web-based patient portal, a number that is expected to grow because of the 21st Century Cures Act. There is limited data on how open note use may have evolved over time or which types of clinical interactions were viewed most in the outpatient setting. ObjectiveThis study aims to analyze trends in outpatient open note access over time; characterize usage in terms of age, sex, and clinical interaction type; and assess the method of access to help uncover areas of improvement in patient engagement and identify further areas of research. MethodsA retrospective observational study was conducted at Erie County Medical Center from November 1, 2021, to December 31, 2022, to coincide with the time that open notes went live. Outpatient note access and account logs were downloaded from the portal and combined into a single dataset consisting of 18,384 note accesses by 4615 users, with column headings of the patient index, sex, age, note title that was accessed, clinical interaction type, time stamp of note creation, time stamp of access, and method of access (web vs mobile). A separate table was created with sex data for all 35,273 portal accounts. Microsoft Excel and Microsoft Power Query were used to combine and analyze the data. ResultsDuring the study period, 4615 portal users viewed 12,150 documents for a total of 18,384 times, averaging 2.6 notes per patient viewed 4 times. Only 13.1% (4615/35,273) of all portal inpatient and outpatient registrants viewed their outpatient notes. There was a female predominance in those who viewed notes (2926/4615, 63.4%; P<.001), while 56.8% (20,047/35,273) of all portal registrants were female. Users in their 30s and 50s accessed more notes than other age groups. The ratio of mobile-to-web access of notes tended to decrease as a function of increasing age, which was not observed in those aged ≥90 years. Notes regarding COVID-19 assessments were the most accessed among all clinical interactions (4725/12,150, 38.9%). Overall, the number of users accessing notes reached a maximum of 1968 before declining to 1027 by the end of the study period. ConclusionsOpen note access was largely dominated by COVID-19 assessments, and the number of users viewing their notes has declined over time as the pandemic subsided. Furthermore, female patients and those aged in their 30s as well as 50s viewed more notes than other groups. Finally, the percentage of notes viewed via a mobile device tended to decrease as a function of increasing age, showing that web-based access of open notes is an important modality for older patients.https://www.jmir.org/2024/1/e55982 |
| spellingShingle | Randeep Singh Badwal Paul Cavo Mandip Panesar Insights and Trends in Open Note Access: Retrospective Observational Study Journal of Medical Internet Research |
| title | Insights and Trends in Open Note Access: Retrospective Observational Study |
| title_full | Insights and Trends in Open Note Access: Retrospective Observational Study |
| title_fullStr | Insights and Trends in Open Note Access: Retrospective Observational Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Insights and Trends in Open Note Access: Retrospective Observational Study |
| title_short | Insights and Trends in Open Note Access: Retrospective Observational Study |
| title_sort | insights and trends in open note access retrospective observational study |
| url | https://www.jmir.org/2024/1/e55982 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT randeepsinghbadwal insightsandtrendsinopennoteaccessretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT paulcavo insightsandtrendsinopennoteaccessretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT mandippanesar insightsandtrendsinopennoteaccessretrospectiveobservationalstudy |