Assessment of condylar and glenoid fossa dimension in various sagittal skeletal malocclusions

INTRODUCTION: Jaw mobility and oral function depend on the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), with the dimensions of the mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa being important for understanding dental and orthodontic conditions. Additionally, advanced imaging, like cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), ha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ashish Ravi Kallur, Remmiya Mary Varghese
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2025-06-01
Series:Journal of Orthodontic Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jos.jos_105_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849425497964937216
author Ashish Ravi Kallur
Remmiya Mary Varghese
author_facet Ashish Ravi Kallur
Remmiya Mary Varghese
author_sort Ashish Ravi Kallur
collection DOAJ
description INTRODUCTION: Jaw mobility and oral function depend on the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), with the dimensions of the mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa being important for understanding dental and orthodontic conditions. Additionally, advanced imaging, like cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), has improved the study of condylar morphology, aiding diagnosis and treatment planning. AIM: To perform morphometric analysis of the TMJs using CBCT in all three dimensions in various skeletal malocclusions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CBCT images of 84 patients were collected for the study. FACAD (ILEXIS AB, Linköping, Sweden) software was used to divide the patients into Class I, II, and III skeletal malocclusions. Dolphin software was used to measure the width, length, and height of condyles and glenoid fossa of the patients from the CBCT images. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to check normality. ANOVA test was performed to assess the statistical significance of the results between the 3 groups. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 30 patients with class I skeletal relation, 34 patients with class II relation, and 20 patients with class III relation. In class I relation, the average condylar height is found to be 16.32 mm ± 2.16 mm, width is 16.47 mm ± 2.61 mm, and length 7.65 mm ± 1.5 mm. The average dimensions of the glenoid fossa in class I skeletal relation were measured to be 19.93 mm ± 2.64 mm in width, 13.93 mm ± 1.45 mm in length, and 6.4 mm ± 1.49 mm in height. CONCLUSION: A statistically significant difference was noted in the condylar width and condylar height among the various skeletal malocclusions. The morphological parameters assessed in this study require more investigation to fully understand the mechanisms underlying them and investigate the consequences for orthodontic treatment and TMJ health.
format Article
id doaj-art-edd7bef5ee1f4f9093f97b3539ec53d8
institution Kabale University
issn 2278-1897
2278-0203
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthodontic Science
spelling doaj-art-edd7bef5ee1f4f9093f97b3539ec53d82025-08-20T03:29:44ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Orthodontic Science2278-18972278-02032025-06-01141161610.4103/jos.jos_105_24Assessment of condylar and glenoid fossa dimension in various sagittal skeletal malocclusionsAshish Ravi KallurRemmiya Mary VargheseINTRODUCTION: Jaw mobility and oral function depend on the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), with the dimensions of the mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa being important for understanding dental and orthodontic conditions. Additionally, advanced imaging, like cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), has improved the study of condylar morphology, aiding diagnosis and treatment planning. AIM: To perform morphometric analysis of the TMJs using CBCT in all three dimensions in various skeletal malocclusions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CBCT images of 84 patients were collected for the study. FACAD (ILEXIS AB, Linköping, Sweden) software was used to divide the patients into Class I, II, and III skeletal malocclusions. Dolphin software was used to measure the width, length, and height of condyles and glenoid fossa of the patients from the CBCT images. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to check normality. ANOVA test was performed to assess the statistical significance of the results between the 3 groups. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 30 patients with class I skeletal relation, 34 patients with class II relation, and 20 patients with class III relation. In class I relation, the average condylar height is found to be 16.32 mm ± 2.16 mm, width is 16.47 mm ± 2.61 mm, and length 7.65 mm ± 1.5 mm. The average dimensions of the glenoid fossa in class I skeletal relation were measured to be 19.93 mm ± 2.64 mm in width, 13.93 mm ± 1.45 mm in length, and 6.4 mm ± 1.49 mm in height. CONCLUSION: A statistically significant difference was noted in the condylar width and condylar height among the various skeletal malocclusions. The morphological parameters assessed in this study require more investigation to fully understand the mechanisms underlying them and investigate the consequences for orthodontic treatment and TMJ health.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jos.jos_105_24cbctcondyleglenoid fossaskeletal malocclusiontmj
spellingShingle Ashish Ravi Kallur
Remmiya Mary Varghese
Assessment of condylar and glenoid fossa dimension in various sagittal skeletal malocclusions
Journal of Orthodontic Science
cbct
condyle
glenoid fossa
skeletal malocclusion
tmj
title Assessment of condylar and glenoid fossa dimension in various sagittal skeletal malocclusions
title_full Assessment of condylar and glenoid fossa dimension in various sagittal skeletal malocclusions
title_fullStr Assessment of condylar and glenoid fossa dimension in various sagittal skeletal malocclusions
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of condylar and glenoid fossa dimension in various sagittal skeletal malocclusions
title_short Assessment of condylar and glenoid fossa dimension in various sagittal skeletal malocclusions
title_sort assessment of condylar and glenoid fossa dimension in various sagittal skeletal malocclusions
topic cbct
condyle
glenoid fossa
skeletal malocclusion
tmj
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jos.jos_105_24
work_keys_str_mv AT ashishravikallur assessmentofcondylarandglenoidfossadimensioninvarioussagittalskeletalmalocclusions
AT remmiyamaryvarghese assessmentofcondylarandglenoidfossadimensioninvarioussagittalskeletalmalocclusions