Cost effectiveness analysis of childhood obesity primary prevention programmes: a systematic review

<p><strong>Background. </strong>Childhood obesity is associated with enormous health consequences and costs to society. This study aims to systematically review the studies on Cost Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) of primary prevention programmes of childhood obesity, discussing the ga...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sebnem Erdol, Walter Mazzucco, Stefania Boccia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Milano University Press 2014-01-01
Series:Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Public Health
Online Access:http://ebph.it/article/view/9416
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850165656530452480
author Sebnem Erdol
Walter Mazzucco
Stefania Boccia
author_facet Sebnem Erdol
Walter Mazzucco
Stefania Boccia
author_sort Sebnem Erdol
collection DOAJ
description <p><strong>Background. </strong>Childhood obesity is associated with enormous health consequences and costs to society. This study aims to systematically review the studies on Cost Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) of primary prevention programmes of childhood obesity, discussing the gaps and providing recommendations for future research.                                              <strong></strong></p><p><strong>Methods. </strong>All the<strong> </strong>studies on the cost effectiveness evaluation of  primary prevention of obesity among children were included. Studies were retrieved from MEDLINE and Google Scholar, up to 31<sup>st</sup> March 2012, with only English language papers being eligible. The quality of the retrieved studies was evaluated by using the Drummond scale.</p><p><strong>Results. </strong>Eight studies were included, five of which concerning community-based intervention programmes, while three school-based programmes. Fifty-percent of the studies, 3 school-based and 1 community-based primary prevention programme reported the intervention being cost effective. The studies were heterogeneous in terms of study design, quality, target population and outcome measures. Use of the Drummond scale showed that the eight studies were of low-medium quality.                                                                                           </p><p><strong>Conclusion.</strong> Although model-based studies may be considered as practical measures applicable to different type of programmes and settings, we auspicate for a convergence towards the use of homogenous clinical and outcome measures in order to properly evaluate the added value of obesity primary prevention programmes in childhood.</p><p><strong>Keywords:</strong> cost-effectiveness, childhood obesity, overweight, primary prevention, systemic review.</p>
format Article
id doaj-art-edd44d80b6bf4ddfba1e90fa91abba9b
institution OA Journals
issn 2282-0930
language English
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Milano University Press
record_format Article
series Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Public Health
spelling doaj-art-edd44d80b6bf4ddfba1e90fa91abba9b2025-08-20T02:21:41ZengMilano University PressEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Public Health2282-09302014-01-0111310.2427/94168983Cost effectiveness analysis of childhood obesity primary prevention programmes: a systematic reviewSebnem Erdol0Walter MazzuccoStefania BocciaSDA Bocconi<p><strong>Background. </strong>Childhood obesity is associated with enormous health consequences and costs to society. This study aims to systematically review the studies on Cost Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) of primary prevention programmes of childhood obesity, discussing the gaps and providing recommendations for future research.                                              <strong></strong></p><p><strong>Methods. </strong>All the<strong> </strong>studies on the cost effectiveness evaluation of  primary prevention of obesity among children were included. Studies were retrieved from MEDLINE and Google Scholar, up to 31<sup>st</sup> March 2012, with only English language papers being eligible. The quality of the retrieved studies was evaluated by using the Drummond scale.</p><p><strong>Results. </strong>Eight studies were included, five of which concerning community-based intervention programmes, while three school-based programmes. Fifty-percent of the studies, 3 school-based and 1 community-based primary prevention programme reported the intervention being cost effective. The studies were heterogeneous in terms of study design, quality, target population and outcome measures. Use of the Drummond scale showed that the eight studies were of low-medium quality.                                                                                           </p><p><strong>Conclusion.</strong> Although model-based studies may be considered as practical measures applicable to different type of programmes and settings, we auspicate for a convergence towards the use of homogenous clinical and outcome measures in order to properly evaluate the added value of obesity primary prevention programmes in childhood.</p><p><strong>Keywords:</strong> cost-effectiveness, childhood obesity, overweight, primary prevention, systemic review.</p>http://ebph.it/article/view/9416
spellingShingle Sebnem Erdol
Walter Mazzucco
Stefania Boccia
Cost effectiveness analysis of childhood obesity primary prevention programmes: a systematic review
Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Public Health
title Cost effectiveness analysis of childhood obesity primary prevention programmes: a systematic review
title_full Cost effectiveness analysis of childhood obesity primary prevention programmes: a systematic review
title_fullStr Cost effectiveness analysis of childhood obesity primary prevention programmes: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Cost effectiveness analysis of childhood obesity primary prevention programmes: a systematic review
title_short Cost effectiveness analysis of childhood obesity primary prevention programmes: a systematic review
title_sort cost effectiveness analysis of childhood obesity primary prevention programmes a systematic review
url http://ebph.it/article/view/9416
work_keys_str_mv AT sebnemerdol costeffectivenessanalysisofchildhoodobesityprimarypreventionprogrammesasystematicreview
AT waltermazzucco costeffectivenessanalysisofchildhoodobesityprimarypreventionprogrammesasystematicreview
AT stefaniaboccia costeffectivenessanalysisofchildhoodobesityprimarypreventionprogrammesasystematicreview